Watermark Market Neutral Trust A (WMF0001AU) Report & Performance

What is the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A fund?

The Fund aims to deliver consistent positive rates of return with relatively low volatility, whilst maintaining little or no net exposure to the underlying equity market. The Fund is an equity market neutral product which invests in, or short sells, shares of companies listed on exchanges including but not limited to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Watermark Market Neutral Trust A

Watermark Market Neutral Trust A Fund Commentary June 30, 2023

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. The Fund’s net performance came in at -3.2% for the month of June. The overall performance was achieved again in a tumultuous market environment: concerns on rising inflationary pressures, bigger then expected interest rates rises, as well as recessionary outlook scenarios in developed markets just to name a few.

The Australian share market (AS51 Index), posted a brutal loss of -8.92% for the month of June, and with the Fund’s historical Beta yardstick of 0.31, the expected loss of the Fund came as no major surprise. Pleasingly, over a 12-month perspective, the Fund delivered a positive return of +9.6% for FY22 compared to a loss of -10.2% for the ASX 200 share market. This is a whopping +19.8% relative outperformance for FY22 as the defensive character of the strategy came to fruition.

The Fund’s key risk metrics show a strong Sharpe Ratio of 2.5, an average since inception net daily Alpha of 6.1 basis points, and monthly win/loss ratio of 66% underlining the consistency of delivering positive performance and as a result the asymmetric return profile. Our directional Alpha exposures, mostly investments in thematic themes such as electrification, nickel, uranium, battery and lithium, have experienced wide negative fluctuations causing the majority of the Fund’s losses. Even though we feel that the long-term investment thesis still holds, we have taken pro-active steps to lower the directional Alpha book from 20% down to 13.4% in response to taking into consideration the probability of recession severely impacting our long-term thesis. Overall Fund gross exposure ended at 286% as we increased the Event (M&A Risk Arb) bucket to 131% from 104%. Our models identified opportunities in proposed companies’ asset sales and subsequent distribution of capital to shareholders, for a significant portion of their remaining equity value. Examples included Prospect Resources (PSC AU) and Ardent Leisure Group (ALG AU). Those capital return trades offer great optionality for a positive re-rate post distribution of the sales proceeds.

We had very positive experience in the past with Cardno Limited (CDD AU) and we believe PSC and ALG will deliver positive outcomes. In PSC, we have built a very large position in the Fund at an average cost of 94c. PSC announced the sale of the Prospect group’s 87% interest in the Arcadia Lithium Project to a subsidiary of the new energy lithium-ion battery material producer, Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, with an expected cash distribution of A$440m to A$450m equating to approximately 94c – 96c cash distribution. On 17th June PSC announced a capital reduction of 19c and a special dividend of 77c for a total 96c distribution. Note only were we able to build this position at zero equity value, but also benefiting from the higher expected range. Further optionality lies ahead once PSC trades Ex Cash Entitlement, as PSC will remain listed as a going concern, intending to retain a cash balance of A$30-40m equating for a 6.4c per share. As for ALG, we expect a significant re-rate post distribution of the sale of “Main Event” and the remaining stub-business in Dreamworld (and other attractions) is expected to be earning positive cash flows. Another catalyst might be a merger between Village Roadshow and ALG. The biggest return detractor in the M&A book was Humm Group (HUM AU) impacting the overall performance of -65basis points. On June 17th Latitude (LFS AU) and HUM mutually terminated the sale agreement for “humm consumer finance”, in light of the current major disruption in financial markets. It came as a surprise as the Material adverse change (MAC Clause) was specifically excluded from the deal conditions.

In the Volatility sub-strategy, we have successfully unwound our net short position in VIX Futures. We aim to re-establish a long volatility exposure once spot volatility trades in the mid 20s. The Fund continues to find and implement very attractive risk/return opportunities, and with an asymmetric return philosophy in mind is very much resilient towards broader market gyrations.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Performance Review
  • Product Overview
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Watermark Market Neutral Trust A-0.02%-5%-9.17%2.81%5.93%11.97%9.48%8.34%-11.31%-11.46%-11.46%

Product Overview

Peer Comparison

Product Details

Product Due Diligence

What is Watermark Market Neutral Trust A

Watermark Market Neutral Trust A is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Credit Suisse AllHedge Long/Short Equity Index and sits inside the Alternatives - Market Neutral Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Watermark Market Neutral Trust A has Assets Under Management of 36.00 M with a management fee of 1.53%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.6%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

How is risk measured in this investment product?

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

What are similar investment products?

What level of diversification will Watermark Market Neutral Trust A provide?

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

How do I compare the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A with the Credit Suisse AllHedge Long/Short Equity Index?

Can I sort and compare the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A to do my own analysis?

Has the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

How can I invest in Watermark Market Neutral Trust A?

How do I get in contact with the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A?

Comments from SMSF Mates

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. The month of September saw world equity markets plummet with the Australian Share market (ASX 200) falling -7.3%, and the MSCI Asia Pacific -12.4%. Against this backdrop the Fund’s net performance came in at -8.8 % for the month of September and the portfolio was not immune to withstand the pressure on general M&A deal spread widening risk that drove market-to-market losses, existing M&A deals falling over, temporary Beta dislocation against our hedges (particularly on the short side) as well as some of our direction Alpha trades falling by more than the market. The negative market sentiment in the USA continues to spill around our region, as fears surrounding the rise in inflationary pressures, hawkish commentary from the US Federal Reserve back, saw the US equity markets experience their worst September month since 2008. For the Calendar Year the S&P 500 is now -25%. We are disappointed that for this month the Fund underdelivered on the promise of delivering Alpha returns, but it was owing to very unusual black swan events particularly in some of our M&A positions that experienced 7 deal breaks during the month.

Overall Fund gross exposure ended at 214% vs 219% the previous month, with the Event (M&A Risk Arb) bucket at 87%, the Relative Value bucket at 106% and the directional Alpha at 20%. The M&A bucket, which include unannounced M&A deal transactions, Stake building exercises as well as Capital Return trades contributed -2.6% towards overall performance. High profile deal breaks in Australia were Ramsay Healthcare (RHC AU) as well as Link Group (LNK AU). We have kept a small position in RHC as rumours emerged that the bidding entity KKR consortium had called off their takeover talks. However, KKR continued to commit to the cash/scrip proposal until on September 26th both RHC and KKR agreed to mutually terminate discussions. As for LNK, one of the last remaining condition, namely the FCA approval, was not fulfilled as the FCA proposed a A$516m redress payment for legacy issues. As LNK did not make any provisions in their balance sheet, and was completely ignored by market participants, this material payment effectively killed any chance that the deal with Dye and Durham would complete.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2022

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2021

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2021

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2021

Performance Commentary - October 31, 2020

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner