Watermark Market Neutral Trust A (WMF0001AU) Report & Performance

What is the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A fund?

The Fund aims to deliver consistent positive rates of return with relatively low volatility, whilst maintaining little or no net exposure to the underlying equity market. The Fund is an equity market neutral product which invests in, or short sells, shares of companies listed on exchanges including but not limited to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Watermark Market Neutral Trust A

Watermark Market Neutral Trust A Fund Commentary June 30, 2023

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. The Fund’s net performance came in at -3.2% for the month of June. The overall performance was achieved again in a tumultuous market environment: concerns on rising inflationary pressures, bigger then expected interest rates rises, as well as recessionary outlook scenarios in developed markets just to name a few.

The Australian share market (AS51 Index), posted a brutal loss of -8.92% for the month of June, and with the Fund’s historical Beta yardstick of 0.31, the expected loss of the Fund came as no major surprise. Pleasingly, over a 12-month perspective, the Fund delivered a positive return of +9.6% for FY22 compared to a loss of -10.2% for the ASX 200 share market. This is a whopping +19.8% relative outperformance for FY22 as the defensive character of the strategy came to fruition.

The Fund’s key risk metrics show a strong Sharpe Ratio of 2.5, an average since inception net daily Alpha of 6.1 basis points, and monthly win/loss ratio of 66% underlining the consistency of delivering positive performance and as a result the asymmetric return profile. Our directional Alpha exposures, mostly investments in thematic themes such as electrification, nickel, uranium, battery and lithium, have experienced wide negative fluctuations causing the majority of the Fund’s losses. Even though we feel that the long-term investment thesis still holds, we have taken pro-active steps to lower the directional Alpha book from 20% down to 13.4% in response to taking into consideration the probability of recession severely impacting our long-term thesis. Overall Fund gross exposure ended at 286% as we increased the Event (M&A Risk Arb) bucket to 131% from 104%. Our models identified opportunities in proposed companies’ asset sales and subsequent distribution of capital to shareholders, for a significant portion of their remaining equity value. Examples included Prospect Resources (PSC AU) and Ardent Leisure Group (ALG AU). Those capital return trades offer great optionality for a positive re-rate post distribution of the sales proceeds.

We had very positive experience in the past with Cardno Limited (CDD AU) and we believe PSC and ALG will deliver positive outcomes. In PSC, we have built a very large position in the Fund at an average cost of 94c. PSC announced the sale of the Prospect group’s 87% interest in the Arcadia Lithium Project to a subsidiary of the new energy lithium-ion battery material producer, Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, with an expected cash distribution of A$440m to A$450m equating to approximately 94c – 96c cash distribution. On 17th June PSC announced a capital reduction of 19c and a special dividend of 77c for a total 96c distribution. Note only were we able to build this position at zero equity value, but also benefiting from the higher expected range. Further optionality lies ahead once PSC trades Ex Cash Entitlement, as PSC will remain listed as a going concern, intending to retain a cash balance of A$30-40m equating for a 6.4c per share. As for ALG, we expect a significant re-rate post distribution of the sale of “Main Event” and the remaining stub-business in Dreamworld (and other attractions) is expected to be earning positive cash flows. Another catalyst might be a merger between Village Roadshow and ALG. The biggest return detractor in the M&A book was Humm Group (HUM AU) impacting the overall performance of -65basis points. On June 17th Latitude (LFS AU) and HUM mutually terminated the sale agreement for “humm consumer finance”, in light of the current major disruption in financial markets. It came as a surprise as the Material adverse change (MAC Clause) was specifically excluded from the deal conditions.

In the Volatility sub-strategy, we have successfully unwound our net short position in VIX Futures. We aim to re-establish a long volatility exposure once spot volatility trades in the mid 20s. The Fund continues to find and implement very attractive risk/return opportunities, and with an asymmetric return philosophy in mind is very much resilient towards broader market gyrations.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Watermark Market Neutral Trust AWMF0001AUManaged FundsAlternativesMarket NeutralAlternatives - Market Neutral IndexCredit Suisse AllHedge Long/Short Equity Index36.00 M1.53%00.6%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Watermark Market Neutral Trust A-0.02%-5%-9.17%2.81%5.93%11.97%9.48%8.34%-11.31%-11.46%-11.46%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Watermark Market Neutral Trust AAlternatives - Market Neutral Index-5.81%2.94%-0.21%0.3%0.3%1.5110.88%7.33%0.520.53

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Watermark Market Neutral Trust AYes-https://wfunds.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Watermark Market Neutral Trust A

Watermark Market Neutral Trust A is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Credit Suisse AllHedge Long/Short Equity Index and sits inside the Alternatives - Market Neutral Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Watermark Market Neutral Trust A has Assets Under Management of 36.00 M with a management fee of 1.53%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.6%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A has returned -0.02% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 2.81% annualised and 8.34% each year since inception, which is when the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Watermark Market Neutral Trust A first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.54 with an annualised volatility of 8.34%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -11.31% and -11.46% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Watermark Market Neutral Trust A has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Alternatives - Market Neutral Index of -5.81% and 2.94% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Watermark Market Neutral Trust A has produced Alpha over the Alternatives - Market Neutral Index of -0.21% in the last 12 months and 0.3% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Alternatives - Market Neutral Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Watermark Market Neutral Trust A provide?

Watermark Market Neutral Trust A has a correlation coefficient of 0.53 and a beta of 1.51 when compared to the Alternatives - Market Neutral Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Watermark Market Neutral Trust A and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A with the Credit Suisse AllHedge Long/Short Equity Index?

For a full quantitative report on Watermark Market Neutral Trust A compared to the Credit Suisse AllHedge Long/Short Equity Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Watermark Market Neutral Trust A?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A?

If you would like to get in contact with the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Watermark Market Neutral Trust A. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. The month of September saw world equity markets plummet with the Australian Share market (ASX 200) falling -7.3%, and the MSCI Asia Pacific -12.4%. Against this backdrop the Fund’s net performance came in at -8.8 % for the month of September and the portfolio was not immune to withstand the pressure on general M&A deal spread widening risk that drove market-to-market losses, existing M&A deals falling over, temporary Beta dislocation against our hedges (particularly on the short side) as well as some of our direction Alpha trades falling by more than the market. The negative market sentiment in the USA continues to spill around our region, as fears surrounding the rise in inflationary pressures, hawkish commentary from the US Federal Reserve back, saw the US equity markets experience their worst September month since 2008. For the Calendar Year the S&P 500 is now -25%. We are disappointed that for this month the Fund underdelivered on the promise of delivering Alpha returns, but it was owing to very unusual black swan events particularly in some of our M&A positions that experienced 7 deal breaks during the month.

Overall Fund gross exposure ended at 214% vs 219% the previous month, with the Event (M&A Risk Arb) bucket at 87%, the Relative Value bucket at 106% and the directional Alpha at 20%. The M&A bucket, which include unannounced M&A deal transactions, Stake building exercises as well as Capital Return trades contributed -2.6% towards overall performance. High profile deal breaks in Australia were Ramsay Healthcare (RHC AU) as well as Link Group (LNK AU). We have kept a small position in RHC as rumours emerged that the bidding entity KKR consortium had called off their takeover talks. However, KKR continued to commit to the cash/scrip proposal until on September 26th both RHC and KKR agreed to mutually terminate discussions. As for LNK, one of the last remaining condition, namely the FCA approval, was not fulfilled as the FCA proposed a A$516m redress payment for legacy issues. As LNK did not make any provisions in their balance sheet, and was completely ignored by market participants, this material payment effectively killed any chance that the deal with Dye and Durham would complete.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. The Fund’s net performance came in at -3.2% for the month of June. The overall performance was achieved again in a tumultuous market environment: concerns on rising inflationary pressures, bigger then expected interest rates rises, as well as recessionary outlook scenarios in developed markets just to name a few.

The Australian share market (AS51 Index), posted a brutal loss of -8.92% for the month of June, and with the Fund’s historical Beta yardstick of 0.31, the expected loss of the Fund came as no major surprise. Pleasingly, over a 12-month perspective, the Fund delivered a positive return of +9.6% for FY22 compared to a loss of -10.2% for the ASX 200 share market. This is a whopping +19.8% relative outperformance for FY22 as the defensive character of the strategy came to fruition.

The Fund’s key risk metrics show a strong Sharpe Ratio of 2.5, an average since inception net daily Alpha of 6.1 basis points, and monthly win/loss ratio of 66% underlining the consistency of delivering positive performance and as a result the asymmetric return profile. Our directional Alpha exposures, mostly investments in thematic themes such as electrification, nickel, uranium, battery and lithium, have experienced wide negative fluctuations causing the majority of the Fund’s losses. Even though we feel that the long-term investment thesis still holds, we have taken pro-active steps to lower the directional Alpha book from 20% down to 13.4% in response to taking into consideration the probability of recession severely impacting our long-term thesis. Overall Fund gross exposure ended at 286% as we increased the Event (M&A Risk Arb) bucket to 131% from 104%. Our models identified opportunities in proposed companies’ asset sales and subsequent distribution of capital to shareholders, for a significant portion of their remaining equity value. Examples included Prospect Resources (PSC AU) and Ardent Leisure Group (ALG AU). Those capital return trades offer great optionality for a positive re-rate post distribution of the sales proceeds.

We had very positive experience in the past with Cardno Limited (CDD AU) and we believe PSC and ALG will deliver positive outcomes. In PSC, we have built a very large position in the Fund at an average cost of 94c. PSC announced the sale of the Prospect group’s 87% interest in the Arcadia Lithium Project to a subsidiary of the new energy lithium-ion battery material producer, Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, with an expected cash distribution of A$440m to A$450m equating to approximately 94c – 96c cash distribution. On 17th June PSC announced a capital reduction of 19c and a special dividend of 77c for a total 96c distribution. Note only were we able to build this position at zero equity value, but also benefiting from the higher expected range. Further optionality lies ahead once PSC trades Ex Cash Entitlement, as PSC will remain listed as a going concern, intending to retain a cash balance of A$30-40m equating for a 6.4c per share. As for ALG, we expect a significant re-rate post distribution of the sale of “Main Event” and the remaining stub-business in Dreamworld (and other attractions) is expected to be earning positive cash flows. Another catalyst might be a merger between Village Roadshow and ALG. The biggest return detractor in the M&A book was Humm Group (HUM AU) impacting the overall performance of -65basis points. On June 17th Latitude (LFS AU) and HUM mutually terminated the sale agreement for “humm consumer finance”, in light of the current major disruption in financial markets. It came as a surprise as the Material adverse change (MAC Clause) was specifically excluded from the deal conditions.

In the Volatility sub-strategy, we have successfully unwound our net short position in VIX Futures. We aim to re-establish a long volatility exposure once spot volatility trades in the mid 20s. The Fund continues to find and implement very attractive risk/return opportunities, and with an asymmetric return philosophy in mind is very much resilient towards broader market gyrations.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2022

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. We are pleased to report a positive net performance of 2.9% for the month of March achieved in a tumultuous market environment, as geopolitical risks intensified by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and volatility ripped through the Asia Pacific markets, particularly in Hong Kong HSCEI index.

MSCI Asia Pacific fell -1.0%, whilst at home the Australian share market (ASX) posted a strong +6.4% gain, mainly the result of a sharp increases in the commodity, and deep value banking sectors. Despite the sharp recovery the maximum drawdown of -10.4% has still not been fully recovered since mid-August 2021, finishing the month at -1.7%. Interesting to note is the asymmetric nature of the Funds resilience towards downside risk evidenced in the month of January but capturing 62% of the upside as markets recovered in Australia posting a net gain of +2.6% for the quarter. The Fund’s key risk metrics show a strong Sharpe Ratio of 3.6, an average since inception gross daily Alpha of 11.2 basis points, and a win/loss ratio of 66% undermining the consistency of delivering positive outcomes when it really matters.

Overall Fund gross exposure ended at 183%, with Events (M&A Risk Arb) bucket down to 66% from 69%. The individual gross exposure reduction in the M&A bucket, continued to be the result of certain M&A deals completing successfully. In Australia, completed deals included Australian Pharma Industries (API AU) acquired by Wesfarmers (WES AU), and the scrip deal between Over the Wire (OTW AU) with Aussie Broadband (ABB AU). The winning trade was the completed acquisition of Senex (SXY AU) acquired by a consortium led by Posco International (047050 KS) following a deal bump from A$4.40 to A$4.60 including dividends. The realized IRR in this trade was >20%p.a. Our existing position in Irongate Group (IAP AU) posted the strongest contribution within the M&A bucket gaining 8.5% in March. To recap: In October 2021 360 Capital Reit (TOT AU) made a cash offer at A$1.65, which seemed at that time fair representing a 1.15x multiple to NAV which is in line to other precedents. However, IAP reported strong uplift in NAV of A$1.61 vs 360 Capital’s proposed offer and consequently rejected the Non-binding-indicative-offer (NBIO). 360 Capital responded with an uplift in consideration to A$1.72. Fast forward to 31st January, IAP announced that it has received a NBIO proposal from Charter Hall and PGGM consortium to acquire all shares at A$1.90 plus dividends. Given that NTA premium in real estate takeovers is typically less than 10%, the proposed offer price at more than 20% premium to NTA will no doubt look attractive to the IAP board. On 30th March IAP entered a binding scheme of arrangement at A$1.9467 thereby sharply increasing the probability of the scheme completing successfully as, together with the agreement for 360 Capital to acquire certain assets post deal, lessens any shareholder vote risk

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2021

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. The Fund manager’s estimated net return for September is +3.00%, where the majority of the performance stems from a strategic positioning in a pre-event name in Japan. This positive result is particularly pleasing as the Fund achieved its best quarterly performance of +6.7% during a weak market environment for the Australian market falling -2.7% in September. The Australian market also experienced its biggest drawdown return of -5.7% for the year finishing the month at -4.5%. Our investment results continue to show a low correlation to peers and markets, with positive daily Alpha contribution averaging +13 basis points.

Overall gross exposure was 199%, with Events (Risk Arb) bucket down to 90% from 124%. We have increased the Relative Value bucket to 88% at the expense of two large Japanese scrip-mergers completing successfully. We see a continuation of elevated M&A deal activity which enables the Fund to find new opportunities to replenish the M&A book in an extremely healthy M&A event landscape. The biggest return contributor was our position in Shinsei Bank (8303 JP; Shinsei) rallying 48%. To recap: back in December/January our monitors have picked up a significant stake building activity in Shinsei by SBI Holding (8473 JP; SBI). It was further disclosed that Taiwan’s biggest bank CTBC Financial (2891 TT) showed interest in acquiring Shinsei. However, those takeover rumors were later dismissed. Shinsei also had a significant equity stake in Jih Sun Financial (5820 TT) which was subject to a takeover offer by Fubon Financial (2881 TT) offering TW$13 in December 2020. We accumulated a sizeable, long position in Shinsei ahead of a potential large share buyback (SBB) announcement event as the consideration for the stake sale would be approximately 19% of Shinsei’s market capitalization. In the SBI Financial Results announcement on 29th January, SBI outlined their plan for the “Evolution of Regional Banking in Japan” and reported to have plans to create “Japanese 4th Mega Bank” through its co-creation with other regional banks. SBI’s regional partners are Yamaguchi Financial, Concordia Financial and Shinsei. We viewed Shinsei’s completion of the stake sale in Jih Sun, a subsequent potential large SBB, and the likelihood of SBI to make its move to further increase its stake or even to privatize a cashedup Shinsei, are the next key catalysts for a strong re-rating. On 9th September, SBI announced an unsolicited hostile partial offer to acquire Shinsei at JPY 2,000 per share increasing its equity stake from current 20.3% to 48% via a tender offer process. Shinsei was trading limit-up for the next two trading days post announcement, and the Fund exited the position at JPY 2,030 well above the theoretical pro-rated price of JPY 1,750. In Australia, the first bid being tabled is not necessarily the last one, as history shows that there is a 40% chance of an increase in consideration. This is exactly what happened to our position in Australian Pharmaceutical Industry (API AU). The bidder Wesfarmers Ltd (WES AU) has revised its indicative proposal from A$1.38 to A$1.55 allowing WES to undertake exclusive due diligence on API. On 27th September API has received a competing non-binding indicative scrip/cash offer from Sigma Healthcare (SIG AU) valuing API at A$1.59. We view API to be trading above the WES cash terms given the potential bump in SIG scrip optionality and await further announcement

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2021

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. The bulk of this month’s negative return of -0.57% can be attributed to single M&A transaction that failed, as a result of the bidder walking away from a non-binding transaction. The previous strong returns however due to a multitude of counterbids by rival bidders, increase in offer considerations as well as locking-in positive M&A deal spreads, as a result of successful completed M&A transactions. Fortunately for the strategy, there is a deep pipeline of deals on the horizon and counterbids are more of a norm than a rarity. History shows that in Australia, there is a 40% probability of an increase in the offer considerations across all live M&A deal transactions and in terms of deal-break risk, one in five unfortunately fails. The key in a failing M&A deal transaction is to have strong risk management approach to minimize the overall impact to the Fund, as well as strategies in place to manage non-systematic tail-end risk. The position in question is McPherson (MCP AU). Even though MCP hostile low ball on-market takeover offer from Gallin at A$1.34 lapsed, MCP has received a non-binding competing offer from Arrotex at A$1.60.

We factored in a 65% probability of a deal completion as due diligence was granted. However, after providing Arrotex with the agreed four-week due diligence period, the Board announced that the parties have agreed to cease discussions and Arrotex has withdrawn its indicative proposal. We exited the position as MCP traded well below the floor price of A$1.34 realizing an overall loss of – 42bp.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2021

The event-driven strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular M&A events. Even though the final reported March performance was +0.52%, the Fund would have printed a much higher overall performance due to three big scrip M&A deals in Japan becoming effective on 1st April.

In the first two weeks of April, the Fund’s return is already +2% as a result of the crystallization of those Japanese M&A deals being recognised by the Fund’s accountant. The event landscape continues to remain healthy, with overall gross exposure increasing to 224% compared to 203% from the previous month. The biggest return contributor was our position in WPP AUNZ Limited (WPP AU). To recap, WPP PLC through Cavendish has agreed to acquire the remaining 38.5% of WPP AU that is does not currently own at $0.70 AUD per share by way of scheme of arrangement. The optionality in this trade was particularly evident when WPP AU declared an increase of the fully franked dividend and special dividends of up to $0.20 AUD per share. The Fund took an aggressive long position below $0.69 AUD and whilst WPP traded cum franking credit entitlement above $0.73 AUD, the Fund realized a 6% gain on the long position

Performance Commentary - October 31, 2020

The event-driven sub-strategy aims to exploit pricing inefficiencies around corporate activity, in particular hard catalyst events such as M&A and restructuring/spin-offs events. The current M&A deal activity is particularly strong in Australia and Japan, and even in less liquid markets (Thailand and Malaysia) has seen the M&A landscape favouring target companies. History has shown that the 4th quarter is typically associated with little deal activity particularly leading into year-end. However, during November and at the time of writing, we were experiencing, nearly every day, a new deal that came to the market, which offered a unique situation to capture the expected deal spread. During the course of the month, the Event bucket constituted 48.9% of overall gross exposure and contributed -25bp to overall gross performance, as we were building new positions.

We believe the event-driven strategy is well positioned in this environment, and the current M&A tailwind is giving us comfort for a continued elevated M&A deal activity in 2021 to lock-in attractive deal spreads.

There was no contribution from Market Neutral and Trend alpha families to the monthly returns in November as we have made a decision to go slow as market liquidity contracts and election fallout continues to dominate media.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee