Russell Global Opportunities A (RIM0032AU) Report & Performance

What is the Russell Global Opportunities A fund?

Russell Global Opportunities A aims to significantly outperform the Fund’s benchmark, before costs and tax, over the long term by providing exposure to a diversified portfolio of predominantly international shares. The Fund invests predominantly in a broad range of international shares listed on stock exchanges in developed and emerging international markets. Derivatives may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and markets, to implement investment strategies and to manage risk.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Russell Global Opportunities A

Russell Global Opportunities A Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund performed in line with the benchmark in the September quarter. However, the Fund did deliver negative absolute returns over the period.

An overweight exposure and strong stock selection in Japan contributed positively to performance, including our holdings in retailer Ryohin Keikaku Co., Toyo Tire Corp. and car maker Suzuki Motor Corp. All three stocks posted strong, double-digit gains for the quarter. Stock selection in the UK also added value over the period; notably overweights to electric services company Centrica and multinational aerospace and defence firm RollsRoyce. A short position in insurer Prudential added further value after the stock fell more than 20% over the period. Other notable positions to add value were overweights to Canadian integrated energy company Suncor Energy and an ex-benchmark holding in Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturing company Alchip Technologies. In contrast, poor stock selection in the US detracted from overall performance, including underweights to chipmaker NVIDIA Corp., oil major Exxon Mobil and pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly & Co. Other US positions to impact returns were overweights to HCA Healthcare, Microsoft and medical device maker Insulet Corp. Stock selection in emerging markets also weighed on performance. This included our holdings in Chinese mining company Ganfeng Lithium Co. and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics. Performance was further impacted by stock selection in Continental Europe; notably overweights to French luxury goods maker LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, Swiss peer Cie Financiere Richemont SA and German car makers Mercedes-Benz AG and BMW.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Russell Global Opportunities ARIM0032AUManaged FundsForeign EquityLarge Blend - Multi-ManagerForeign Equity - Large Multi-Manager IndexDeveloped -World Index3.05 BN1.05%00.31%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Russell Global Opportunities A-0.09%2.52%18.73%8.02%8.19%8.28%10.37%11.48%-2.59%-14.72%-36.93%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Russell Global Opportunities AForeign Equity - Large Multi-Manager Index-1.35%0.35%NA%NA%NA%0.931.33%1.85%0.990.99

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Russell Global Opportunities AYes-https://russellinvestments.com/au-

Product Due Diligence

What is Russell Global Opportunities A

Russell Global Opportunities A is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Large Multi-Manager Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Russell Global Opportunities A has Assets Under Management of 3.05 BN with a management fee of 1.05%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.31%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Russell Global Opportunities A has returned -0.09% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 8.02% annualised and 11.48% each year since inception, which is when the Russell Global Opportunities A first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Russell Global Opportunities A first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 11.48%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -2.59% and -36.93% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Russell Global Opportunities A has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Multi-Manager Index of -1.35% and 0.35% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Russell Global Opportunities A has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Large Multi-Manager Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Large Multi-Manager Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Russell Global Opportunities A provide?

Russell Global Opportunities A has a correlation coefficient of 0.99 and a beta of 0.93 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Multi-Manager Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Russell Global Opportunities A and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Russell Global Opportunities A with the Developed -World Index?

For a full quantitative report on Russell Global Opportunities A compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Russell Global Opportunities A to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Russell Global Opportunities A financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Russell Global Opportunities A been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Russell Global Opportunities A?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Russell Global Opportunities A please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Russell Global Opportunities A?

If you would like to get in contact with the Russell Global Opportunities A manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Russell Global Opportunities A. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund narrowly underperformed the benchmark in August. However, the Fund did deliver positive absolute returns for the month. Much of the Fund’s underperformance was driven by poor stock selection in the US. This included underweights to strong-performing names like chip maker NVIDIA, e-commerce platform Amazon.com and pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly & Co. Other US positions to impact returns were overweights to Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) and Microsoft. Stock selection in Continental Europe also weighed on performance in August; notably overweights to Swiss-based luxury goods maker Compagnie Financière Richemont SA and German car makers Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW) and Mercedes-Benz Group A/G. Other key holdings to impact returns were ex-benchmark holdings in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and South African miner AngloGold Ashanti. Both stocks underperformed the broader market over the period. In contrast, the Fund benefited from strong stock selection in the UK; notably a short position in healthcare firm AstraZeneca and overweights to Rolls-Royce and energy provider Centrica. Stock selection in Japan also added value over the period. This included overweights to Toyo Tire Corp., Maruichi Steel Tube and pharmaceutical company Nippon Shinyaku Co. All three stocks recorded strong, double-digit gains for the month. Other notable positions to contribute positively to performance in August were overweights to Saudi Arabian Oil Co. and US names TJX Companies and Mastercard.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund underperformed the benchmark in July. However, the Fund did deliver positive absolute returns for the month.

Stock selection in emerging markets detracted from performance over the period; notably an ex-benchmark holding in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., which fell after management said it expected sales to decline this year amid waning demand. Other emerging markets positions to impact returns were underweights to South Korean steel maker POSCO Holdings and Chinese shopping platform Meituan. Stock selection in Continental Europe also weighed on performance in July, including overweights to Dutch multinational brewing company Heineken N.V. and German car makers Mercedes-Benz and BMW. Other notable positions to impact returns were an underweight to US chipmaker NIVIDA Corp. and an overweight to Japanese electronics company Keyence Corp. In contrast, the Fund benefited from stock selection in the UK; notably overweights to Centrica and Land Securities Group. Both stocks recorded very strong gains for the month. Stock selection in the US also added value in July. This included an underweight to Apple and overweights to Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook), Google parent Alphabet and ratings agency MSCI, Inc. Stock selection in Canada added further value over the period; particularly amongst the country’s large miners. This included overweights to First Quantum Minerals and Ivanhoe Mines. Other key holdings to contribute positively to performance were overweights to Japanese retailer Ryohin Keikaku Co. and US security systems services company Carrier Global.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund underperformed the benchmark in the June quarter.

Contributing to the Fund’s underperformance was stock selection in the US, including underweights to large growth names like NVIDIA Corp., Apple and electric car maker Tesla; all of which posted very strong gains for the quarter. Other US positions to impact returns were underweights to e-commerce giant Amazon.com and semiconductor manufacturer Broadcom. Stock selection in Japan also weighed on performance; notably ex-benchmark holdings in retailer Ryohin Keikaku Co. and electronics company Casio Computer Co. Both stocks fell sharply over the period. Performance was further impacted by stock selection in Canada, albeit modestly. This included an overweight to integrated energy company Suncor Energy and an underweight to multinational e-commerce platform Shopify. In contrast, the Fund benefited from stock selection in the UK, including overweights to private equity firm 3i Group and multinational energy services and solutions company Centrica. An underweight to British American Tobacco also added value. Stock selection in Continental Europe added further value over the period; notably overweights to Dutch bank ING Groep N.V. and German car makers Mercedes-Benz AG and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW). Stock selection in emerging markets also contributed positively to returns, though this was largely offset by our broader overweight to the region. Emerging markets underperformed their developed counterparts over the period.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund underperformed the benchmark in the March quarter.

Contributing to the Fund’s underperformance was poor stock selection in the US, including underweights to large growth names like Apple, NVIDIA Corp. and electric car maker Tesla, which climbed almost 71% over the period. Other US positions to impact returns were an underweight to e-commerce giant Amazon.com and an overweight to Johnson & Johnson. Stock selection in Continental Europe also weighed on performance; notably overweights to Switzerland’s Roche Holding AG and Dutch bank ING Groep NV. Performance was further impacted by poor stock selection in Japan, including an overweight to pharmaceutical company Nippon Shinyaku Co., which fell 21% over the period. Other notable positions to impact returns were overweights to US healthcare names The Cigna Group and UnitedHealth Corp. In contrast, the Fund benefited from strong stock selection in the UK. This included an overweight to private equity firm 3i Group as well as underweights to British American Tobacco and commodities giant Glencore. Stock selection in emerging markets also added value over the period; notably an ex-benchmark holding in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and an overweight to China’s Alibaba Group. Other key holdings to add value were overweights to German car makers Mercedes-Benz AG and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW).

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund outperformed the benchmark in the December quarter. Contributing to the Fund’s outperformance was strong stock selection in the US, including underweights to large growth names like electric car maker Tesla, Apple and ecommerce giant Amazon.com. All three stocks posted sharp, double-digit declines for the quarter. Stock selection in the UK also added value over the period; notably exbenchmark holdings in electric utility Centrica and ITV and an overweight to private equity firm 3i Group.

At the sector level, stock selection was strongest within the consumer discretionary space. In addition to our positions in Tesla and Amazon.com, this included overweights to Japan’s Ryohin Keikaku and German car makers Mercedes-Benz AG and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW). Other key holdings to add value were overweights to Dutch bank ING Groep NV and US names HCA Healthcare and TJX Companies. In contrast, stock selection in Continental Europe detracted from overall returns. This included an overweight to Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche Holding AG and an underweight to Danish healthcare firm Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock selection in Asia Pacific ex Japan also weighed on performance, albeit modestly. This included underweights to strong-performing Hong Kong-listed names such as AIA Group and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing. Other notable positions to impact returns over the period were underweights to Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, UK miner Glencore and US oil major Exxon Mobil.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund outperformed the benchmark in the September quarter. However, the Fund did deliver negative absolute returns for the period. Contributing to the Fund’s outperformance was positive stock selection in emerging markets, including overweights to Brazil’s Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. and India’s ICICI Bank; both of which posted very strong gains for the quarter. Stock selection in Asia Pacific ex Japan also added value; particularly in Hong Kong. This included underweights to AIA Group and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd. Stock selection within the healthcare space added further value over the period; notably overweights to US names Biogen and HCA Healthcare and an underweight to the UK’s AstraZeneca. Other key positions to add value were underweights to China’s Tencent Holdings and Japanese car maker Toyota.

In contrast, poor stock selection in the US detracted from overall returns. This included underweights to strong-performing growth names like Apple, Tesla and Amazon.com. Stock selection in the UK also weighed on performance; notably overweights to Vodafone and Land Securities Group. At the sector level, stock selection was weakest within information technology. In addition to our holding in Apple, this included overweights to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics. Other notable positions to impact performance were an overweight to China’s Geely Automobile and an underweight to US oil giant Exxon Mobil. There were no material changes to either the Fund’s structure or manager line up during the quarter.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

The Russell Investments Global Opportunities Fund outperformed the benchmark in the June quarter. However, the Fund did deliver negative absolute returns for the period. Contributing to the Fund’s outperformance was strong stock selection in Japan, including overweights to used car dealer group USS Co., Yakult Honsha and car maker Subaru Corp.; all of which recorded very strong gains for the quarter.

The Fund also benefited from positive stock selection within the consumer discretionary space; notably underweights to poor-performing US names Tesla and Amazon.com. Both stocks posted sizable declines over the period. Other key positions to add value were overweights to fellow US stocks UnitedHealth Group and Cigna Corp. Our active positioning strategy added further value over the period. The strategy was positioned in favour of value and quality to complement our strategic factor positioning. Both value and quality outperformed in the second quarter. In contrast, poor stock selection in the US detracted from returns. This included overweights to Microsoft, Micron Technology and Google parent Alphabet.

At the sector level, stock selection was weakest within financials, including overweights to UK names Aviva and 3i Group. Other notable positions to impact performance over the period were an underweight to the UK’s AstraZeneca and an overweight to Canada’s First Quantum Minerals. In June, we removed Wellington Management Company (Wellington)’s Global Growth Horizon Equity strategy from the Fund’s manager line up and replaced it with Wellington’s Global Growth Equity strategy.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee