Principal Global Property Securities is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Dvlp Global Real Estate and sits inside the Property - Global Listed Property Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Principal Global Property Securities has Assets Under Management of 201.23 M with a management fee of 1%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.4%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Principal Global Property Securities has returned 2.09% in the last month. The previous three years have returned -1.1% annualised and 17.97% each year since inception, which is when the Principal Global Property Securities first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Principal Global Property Securities first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 17.97%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -5.73% and -66.79% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Principal Global Property Securities has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Property - Global Listed Property Index of 0.13% and -0.28% since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Principal Global Property Securities has produced Alpha over the Property - Global Listed Property Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Property - Global Listed Property Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
Principal Global Property Securities has a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and a beta of 1.06 when compared to the Property - Global Listed Property Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on Principal Global Property Securities and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on Principal Global Property Securities compared to the Dvlp Global Real Estate, you can click here.
To sort and compare the Principal Global Property Securities financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Principal Global Property Securities. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
From December 2018, the performance data shown is based upon the Fund’s official Net Asset Value (NAV) prices. The performance data shown is net of fees and other charges but excludes any potential entry/exit charges- as such the return an investor receives may be lower. Prior to 31st December 2018, the data performance calculations reflect the month-end market close prices of the Fund’s assets. After 1 January 2019, the performance data shown is based upon the Fund’s Net Asset Value (NAV) prices of the last Irish business day of the month. For Funds not open for dealing on this day this will be an indicative NAV. As a result, it is possible that the stated
performance and the actual investment returns available to investors will differ. The performance information reflects performance of the D2 Class income units. Periods over one year are annualised. Investors should obtain their own independent tax advice. **Outperforming the FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed NTR Index is not specifically included in the objective for the Fund, and the figures shown in the table are provided as a comparison only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
All Figures shown in this document are in U.S dollars unless otherwise noted.Source & Copyright: CITYWIRE. Portfolio managers are + rated by Citywire for 3 year riskadjusted performance for the period 31 May 2019 – 31 May 2022. Citywire’s exclusive methodology ranks fund managers based on their individual track records across all funds they manage globally.
Security selection within U.S. and Australian industrial contributed as we were overweight to stocks benefitting from strong earnings results. Overweight to U.S. single family rental contributed as the sector bounced back from first quarter underperformance. Underweights to U.S. malls was also additive as the sector continued to be pressured by fears of a consumer slowdown due to high inflation and gas prices. Positioning within U.S. data centers was a top detractor, as we were underweight to a REIT that benefitted from positive reports on data center leasing and pricing. Overweight to Canadian office detracted, with the sector lagging due to some risk-off investor rotation after outperformance earlier in the year.
From December 2018, the performance data shown is based upon the Fund’s official Net Asset Value (NAV) prices. The performance data shown is net of fees and other charges but excludes any potential entry/exit charges- as such the return an investor receives may be lower. Prior to 31st December 2018, the data performance calculations reflect the month-end market close prices of the Fund’s assets. After 1 January 2019, the performance data shown is based upon the Fund’s Net Asset Value (NAV) prices of the last Irish business day of the month. For Funds not open for dealing on this day this will be an indicative NAV. As a result, it is possible that the stated performance and the actual investment returns available to investors will differ. The performance information reflects performance of the D2 Class income units. Periods over one year are annualised. Investors should obtain their own independent tax advice. **Outperforming the FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed NTR Index is not specifically included in the objective for the Fund, and the figures shown in the table are provided as a comparison only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
All figures shown in this document are in U.S dollars unless otherwise noted.Source & Copyright: CITYWIRE. Portfolio managers are A rated by Citywire for 3 year riskadjusted performance for the period 31 March 2019 – 31 March 2022. Citywire’s exclusive methodology ranks fund managers based on their individual track records across all funds they manage globally.
Equity markets rallied following a widely anticipated 25 bps rate hike from the Fed and a more hawkish outlook statement. Hope of a thawing in the Russia-Ukraine conflict likely contributed to the positive sentiment in the second half of the month, which saw growth stocks and yield-sensitive plays outperforming. Global REITs (FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed NTR, +4.5%) outperformed equities (MSCI World, +2.8%) and global bonds (Barclays Global Aggregate, -3.0%). The 10-year U.S. bond yield soared 60 bps. The Americas was the best performing region. Europe was the main laggard. APAC property stocks had positive performance.
Due to the global rotation away from defensive growth into value, overweight to underperforming defensive sectors like U.K. and Australian industrial, U.K. and U.S. self storage, and U.S towers and single family rental was a main detractor. Underweight to defensive U.S. data centers, which also underperformed due to the rotation, was a top contributor. Overweight to Japanese developers contributed, as higher beta players were out performers.
Market Review
Despite a hawkish Fed pivot and concerns over COVID-19 omicron, equity markets continued to grind higher on the back of continued low real interest rates and evidence that omicron’s severity was milder than prior variants. Global REITs (FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed NTR, +6.3%) outperformed broader equities (MSCI World, +4.3%) and bonds (Bloomberg Global Aggregate, -0.1%). The Americas was the strongest region by a wide margin. Europe lagged as weakness in the Continent diminished strength in the United Kingdom. Asia trailed behind dragged by weakness in higher beta Japanese developers.
Fund Review
Emerging market exposure was a main detractor, due to growth concerns as a result of property cooling measures, and another China residential developer’s bonds were downgraded to junk status. Underweight to the U.S. self-storage sector detracted as the sector continues to benefit from better-than-expected operating updates across occupancy and rental rate growth. With a rotation back into structural growth, overweights to solid fundamentals in U.S. single family rental, industrial, and towers were main contributors. Within U.S. industrial, overweight to a stock that received several sell-side upgrades was beneficial.
Emerging market exposure was a main detractor, as there continued to be concerns over the China property slowdown. Though government policy has shifted from tightening to stabilization, these supply side measures have been inadequate to stabilize demand. Underweight to U.S. malls was a drag on relative performance with the sector being a strong performer as retailers’ earnings results have highlighted robust consumer spending amidst a strong October retail sales report. U.S. data centers and towers positioning detracted, driven by M&A activity. Overweights to strength in U.K. self-storage and U.K. and Australian industrial stocks were the main contributors.
Risk assets sold off on rising stagflationary concerns caused by soaring energy prices, supply chain bottlenecks, and start-stop reopenings as governments struggled tocontain the COVID-19 delta variant. A hawkish Fed meeting during the month helped sparked a surge in U.S. 10-year bond yields. Rate sensitive property stocks (FTSEEPRA/NAREIT Developed NTR, -5.8%) underperformed global equities (MSCI World, -4.1%) and global bonds (Barclays Global Aggregate, -1.8%). Europe was the weakest performer as markets priced in slower growth driven by a combination of a surge in power prices and concerns that a China property-led slowdown would weigh on the export sensitive Euro area. After a relatively weaker first half, Asia was the outperformer, despite concerns over China dominating global headlines. The Americasalso had negative performance. Rising 10-year yields were in focus, coinciding with concerns of slowing growth.
Underperformance was mainly attributed to stock selection. Within Hong Kong, preference for developers over other sectors detracted amidst risk-off sentiment.Overweight to underperforming growth sectors such as U.K. student housing and self-storage, as well as high-quality office exposure in Spain, detracted. In the U.S.,overweights to single family rental and towers detracted. Underweight to malls was detractive. We missed on strength from Australian retail.Underweight to a U.S. data centers REIT contributed. Overweight to a U.S. health care REIT contributed due to positive updates on senior housing occupancy.
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details