Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 (MAQ0640AU) Report & Performance

What is the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 fund?

Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 Fund aims to capture the potential capital growth of small and mid-sized companies in Asia (excluding Japan), and to provide some income.

  • The Fund provides exposure to a portfolio of small and mid-sized companies in Asia (excluding Japan).
  • Actively managed strategy using a combination of quantitative screening and an intensive fundamental research process to select stocks and build a portfolio of Asian (excluding Japan) shares.
  • Consider as high risk/return investment.
  • Derivatives may be used for hedging or to manage economic exposure. The Fund may be exposed to Asian, US and UK currencies and is unhedged. Individual currencies may be hedged to manage risk and liquidity from time to time

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1

Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 Fund Commentary July 31, 2022

Asian small and mid-cap companies outperformed large caps this month, lifted by a dovish Fed rate hike outlook in the final week of July.

• The portfolio performed in line with its benchmark this month as it kept pace with the rally. The largest contribution to performance came from India, where the portfolio companies comfortably outperformed the rallying market. • China was the region’s worst performing market on concerns ranging from property, subdued second half growth outlook, to low visibility over re-opening of its borders. The resurfacing of US listing concerns added some selling pressure on certain names, particularly the large-cap technology companies.

• While the portfolio and small and mid-caps more broadly remain somewhat resilient to these risks the overall market sentiment was negative and China was home to all 5 of the portfolio’s largest individual stock detractors over the month. • From a sectoral perspective, it was pleasing to see Samsung SDI and Sinbon Electronics, which are both leading the transition to greener energy solutions, continue to appreciate in value as their structurally advantaged revenue streams continue to deliver.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1MAQ0640AUManaged FundsForeign EquityAsia Pacific w/o JapanForeign Equity - Asia ex Jap IndexWorld Emerging Markets Index180.57 M1.2%20.00%1%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Macquarie Asia New Stars No.10.72%-3.73%-20.38%3.14%7.48%10.17%14.75%14.23%-21.3%-21.3%-27.52%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index-0.6%0.07%-1.13%0.03%0.03%0.411.6%8.12%0.380.82

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1Yes-https://www.macquarie.com/id/en.html-

Product Due Diligence

What is Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1

Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against World Emerging Markets Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 has Assets Under Management of 180.57 M with a management fee of 1.2%, a performance fee of 20.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 1%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 has returned 0.72% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 3.14% annualised and 14.23% each year since inception, which is when the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.44 with an annualised volatility of 14.23%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -21.3% and -27.52% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index of -0.6% and 0.07% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index of -1.13% in the last 12 months and 0.03% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 provide?

Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 has a correlation coefficient of 0.82 and a beta of 0.4 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 with the World Emerging Markets Index?

For a full quantitative report on Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 compared to the World Emerging Markets Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1?

If you would like to get in contact with the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1 manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Macquarie Asia New Stars No.1. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Video Gallery

No current media available.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

Asian markets declined along with all major equity markets in June although the region outperformed both Developed Market and other Emerging Market bourses.

• The portfolio finished the month roughly in line with its benchmark but ahead over the quarterly period, driven by some downside protection from the higher quality of the portfolio companies along with their ongoing delivery on underlying fundamentals, particularly in consumption related positions.

• The recent period has seen the team travel across India, Korea, Singapore and South East Asia. We have been hearing of continued operational execution and resilience, as well as received some interesting insight on inflation. We perceive inflation to be lower across Asia relative to developed and emerging markets outside Asia and the feedback from companies on the ground has broadly been reflective of this.

• An area we remain positive on is China where we are hearing from companies that as lockdowns have eased activity has resumed and from the government investors are now hearing that their interventions aimed at addressing social inequalities have largely been established. We remain confident in the prospects for our Chinese portfolio companies and expect investors to gradually step back into structurally advantaged China exposures. Chinese equities were among the best performing in the portfolio for the month and quarter, making the largest contribution to absolute and relative returns.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2022

Asian markets declined over the month as the expectations of aggressive policy tightening by the Fed and concerns over global economic growth weighed on the risk sentiment. The portfolio underperformed its benchmark in May primarily driven by what we believe to be stock specific short-term sentiment driven factors.

• The source of this month’s underperformance primarily came from China with the tertiary education providers, China Education Group and China New Higher Education, depressed on negative sentiment toward the sector. We remain positive on their long-term outlook and continue to look through the sector-based volatility that has seen their valuations drop to highly attractive levels, in our view.

• More broadly, we saw signs that market sentiment was turning more positive on the Chinese equities due to the government’s efforts to cushion economic growth slowdown, expectations of Shanghai re-opening and Beijing’s easing Omicron cases and reduced mobility restrictions, as well as US President Joe Biden’s statement that he is considering removing some of the tariffs on Chinese imports.

• On the positive side of things, India was the country where the most outperformance was delivered during the month, with a reopening play via our investment in the MakeMyTrip online travel booking website provider delivering the bulk of the outperformance

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2022

What happened in April?

• Asia New Stars’ quality growth and value disciplines saw it outperform its benchmark* in a period where global markets absorbed the reality that growth will become scarcer in an environment of higher inflation and with it structurally higher interest rates. The domestic focus of the portfolio added resilience with the obvious tailwind of the opening of many of the Asian economies. This opening and escalation of business activity is undeterred by inflation is the feedback from many quarters of the regions especially in South East Asia, India and South Korea where ‘with-COVID’ policies are in place.
• Consistent to our fundamental investment strategy the outperformance was generated from bottom-up stock selection with key contributors coming from India, South Korea and Taiwan in the Financials, Materials and Information Technology sectors. Specifically key contributors included a long held agricultural-chemical company that is benefiting from food inflation, a leading supplier of high-end golfing equipment and a Korean convenient store operator that are benefiting from the re-opening of global and local economies respectively, and a supplier of data-centre equipment as the growing need for data storage is showing little signs of abatement.
• Countering this there were few detractors in a month of a high stock-picking hit rate with the key detractors being cases of reversion from strong recent performance.
• A key regional and global exception to the ‘with-COVID’ strategy is China, yet despite the strict lock-down of Shanghai and its obvious economic drag, China was not an under-performer for the month rebounding into the month end for several subtle, less headline-grabbing but real reasons.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2022

Asia markets retraced modestly in February due to the tensions resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine and fears of inflation rising in a slowing global economy. The Fund underperformed with some of the more export focused companies reverting. Offsetting this was solid delivery in the domestically focused names in India and China.

• The weaker exporting names include two long-term muti-bagger investments for the Fund where we see solid ongoing delivery, these being the South Korean producer of high-end electric vehicle batteries, Samsung SDI and the low-cost innovative India agrichemical company UPL. In both cases the companies operate with superior profitability margins compared to peers and have obvious structural tailwinds being the proliferation of electric vehicles and the higher demand for more productive agriculture in satisfying the expanding appetites and palates of the world’s rapidly growing middle class.

• The offsetting stronger performers for the month shared a common thematic of the emergence of the world from the grasps of COVID-19. These include a rapidly expanding restaurant chain in China, a hospital in India which is now realising fuller occupancy in dealing with a backlog of pent-up elective surgeries and an Indonesian microfinance provider who is extending further finance.

• Although not a focus of the Fund, which has consistently maintained a domestically focused bias, opportunity does nonetheless present itself in the more export focused names where domestically developed competitive advantage is leveraged globally. The more obvious examples of these are in South Korea and Taiwan technology hardware sectors where the Fund is has benefitted from a consistent overweight to electric vehicle batteries for many a year and more recently memory exposures. UPL is a less obvious, but nonetheless an equally compelling example of an exporter with a domestically developed entrenched competitive advantage.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2021

The Fund retraced in December mainly on poor sentiment toward Chinese property services and education companies. The Fund lagged a benchmark that was led higher by cyclicals with Industrial and Materials sectors extending their recent outperformance over the structurally advantaged Consumer and Healthcare sectors.

Both property services and education are respectively supported by trends of increased multi-dwelling living and higher demand for vocational and higher education with a shift toward services and higher technology manufacturing within the Chinese economy, in our view. For the year both sectors witnessed strong earnings growth with high annuity style earnings visibility ahead of them. Nonetheless these highly profitable business models are being overlooked with poor sentiment toward China prevailing.

The discounting of domestic demand names despite the solid earnings delivery saw the portfolio close the year at a material discount to both its own benchmark and global bourses. Despite maintaining superior quality and structural growth prospects, the portfolio has historically tended to trade in line with its more cyclical benchmark which we observe to be a product of the less efficient, under-analysed market. The prevailing discount we see as an exaggerated anomaly

Performance Commentary - November 30, 2021

Asian markets retraced (in USD terms) during November with ongoing competitiveness, slowing demand and regulatory concerns amongst large cap e-commerce tickers, as well as some anticipation of lockdowns with the Omicron COVID-19 strain spreading globally.

Although both small and large cap Asian stocks retraced in unison over the month the fall in smaller companies was more muted. Year-to-date the MSCI Asia ex Japan Small Cap benchmark has outperformed its large cap counterpart by 23% benefitting from diversification and valuation support.

The Fund, being overweight domestic demand and consumption exposures, underperformed its benchmark slightly during November. Regional variances saw the technology heavy Taiwan and the defensive Singapore regions outperforming whilst the more COVID-19 vulnerable South East Asian regions were amongst the underperformers. Sector-wise it was the consumer sector that is more exposed to lockdowns that lagged whilst Information Technology and Communication Services showed resilience with the former shaking concerns around supply side constraints and the latter being a beneficiary from lock-downs and home-working.

Performance Commentary - October 31, 2021

The Fund lagged the benchmark during the month with reversions in South Korean stocks that have performed well year to date, COVID-19 fears in China and capital flows from China around excessive regulatory oversight being the main drivers of performance detraction.

Offsetting these headwinds, the rapid recovery from the impact of the COVID-19 delta-strain in India and South East Asia saw conviction in these regions pick-up and markets rebound.

Much like we did with our long-held conviction investments in India and South East Asia, we hold our conviction in the face of shortterm issues in China. Our resolute view is that quality companies endure and we look to their fundamental delivery and valuations, ahead of sentiment and trends in capital flows.

Hansol Chemical is a conviction position that saw a modest retracement in October but is well placed to be a beneficiary of the structural trend of electric drive trains displacing internal combustion engines, in our view. Although not a pure play on this trend the bottom-up delivery from Hansol is in three key areas being next generation screens for televisions and other electronic devices, memory and elective vehicles. In each case Hansol enjoys strong and improving margins from research and innovation delivering superior inputs as well as security of supply to their industry leading clients whilst gaining scale economies. Whilst others may have taken profits into the rally which has seen the share price more than double over the past year, we hold this position for the growth potential yet to come and we outline why further below

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee