Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has Assets Under Management of 91.39 M with a management fee of 0.64%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.41%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has returned -1.68% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 8.61% annualised and 9.46% each year since inception, which is when the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.76 with an annualised volatility of 9.46%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -4.25% and -16.19% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index of -0.73% and -1.95% since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index of 0.22% in the last 12 months and 0.02% since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has a correlation coefficient of 0.83 and a beta of 0.59 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.
To sort and compare the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
In a quarter marred by the second largest US bank failure, a state-coerced bank merger and slowing corporate earnings, global markets still managed to post a gain of 7.3% (MSCI ACWI in USD as of 31 March 2023).
Fueling the optimism that dominated in January and March, many investors made the case that central banks would pivot from their hard line, anti-inflation stance. The extraordinary rise in global interest rates over the past 18 months continues to stifle lending and create potential asset-liability mismatches, while stoking conjecture over bank solvency. Easing inflationary pressures especially in Europe and the sudden fragility in the banking sector have fueled expectations of a central bank pivot. Inversion in the US and European yield curves, often a harbinger of recession, lessened in March but remained in place. The US dollar fell modestly during the quarter, despite higher nominal US rates. Oil prices sagged on fears of a global recession but ticked up at quarter-end on speculation of potential production cuts.
Regionally, broad-based gains were seen across most developed markets. Asian markets led during the month but lagged for most of the quarter. European markets led during the quarter as inflationary pressures continued to abate, fueling speculation that the European Central Bank (ECB) may be one of the first central banks to pivot from their tight monetary policies. At the same time, easing in supply constraints, lower input price pressures, and jobs growth sent the Eurozone Purchasing Managers Index higher for the fifth straight month. The United States, led by its large technology companies, outperformed the broader global benchmarks with the tech-heavy NASDAQ 100 rallying nearly 17% in the quarter. China reported its fastest rate of growth in non-manufacturing sectors (services) since 2011 but emerging markets lagged developed markets in the quarter.
While regional gains were evenly distributed throughout March, sector performance diverged considerably. A resurgence in technology and communication services stocks was the primary driver of the quarter’s strong return as technology stocks finished 20% higher for the quarter. The financial sector lost 1.5% in the quarter as rumors of multiple potential failures swirled around US regional banks and briefly Deutsche Bank. Weakness in oil prices helped make energy the worst-performing sector in the quarter.
Factor performance over the quarter was dominated by several broad-based themes, including a strong preference for larger cap and less leveraged companies. In our view, this was a function of concerns over the increasing likelihood of tighter lending standards resulting from the banking crisis. Less risky stocks (low beta and volatility) outperformed in March but lagged in the quarter. Sentiment lagged in the quarter driven by the selloff in momentum stocks in January. While companies with lower leverage and higher return on equity (ROE) outperformed, those with better operating margins did not. Growth measures were favorable for the quarter while value was mixed favoring more defensive equities.
The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund gained 1.71% during the month (net of fees), outperforming its MSCI All Country Index benchmark. Stock selection contributed to the excess return; sector positioning detracted. Stock selection was led by consumer discretionary and financials. Allocation wise, the underweight to materials and energy added the most value, which was offset by the underweight to information technology. Regionally, selection was strongest in Japan and China, and weakest in the US and Korea.
The Lazard ACW Global Managed Volatility Fund lost 2.0% during the month (net of fees in AUD terms), underperforming its MSCI All Country benchmark. Both stock selection and sector positioning detracted. Stock selection was led by utilities and healthcare. Allocation wise, the underweight to energy and overweight to communication services added the most value. But these were offset by the overweight to consumer staples. Regionally, selection was strongest in India and Thailand, and weakest in the US and Japan.
The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund outperformed its MSCI All Country World Index benchmark (net of fees in AUD terms) during the quarter. Both stock selection and sector positioning accounted for the excess return. Selection in consumer discretionary and healthcare were beneficial; Holdings in industrials and materials were the largest detractors. Underweights to information technology and consumer discretionary were the largest contributors along with operating cash. Underweights to energy and financials detracted. Regionally, selection was strongest in the United States and Switzerland, and weakest in Taiwan and Singapore. Alpha was mixed but positive as value measures offset weakness in sentiment which suffered large drawdown in November. Quality measures were flat to positive. Growth measure underperformed in October and December but overall, it was flat. Global stocks closed out 2022 with a monthly decline of 3.8% to finish the year with a loss of over 18%, its worst result since 2008. The US dollar continued its recent weakness helping pare the loss for US investors. The broad themes of 2022 – inflation, rising interest rates, war in Ukraine and slowing corporate profits, continued to dominate investor fears in December. Inflation showed signs abating but remained well above central bank targets causing the US Federal Reserve (“Fed”) to maintain its hawkish tone. The inverted yield curve, tepid consumer spending and weak manufacturing orders all point to a likely recession in 2023 with the bond market anticipating that the Fed will soften its tone in response. The Bank of Japan surprised the market by easing yield curve control by 25 basis points as they dealt with the highest inflation in over 40 years and an increasingly illiquid market for Japanese bonds. Chinese officials also began to relax their zero-COVID policies to boost domestic spending and international travel. Unfortunately, it also resulted in a near term surge in COVID cases at year-end. European inflation appears to have peaked in October but remains well above the European Central Bank targets. While the eurozone remains in a recession, optimism that the contraction will not be as deep as initially feared, surfaced in December. Asian markets, led by China, posted a positive return for the month but was the worst region for the year. North America (United States) markets trailed in the month as the US proved to be one of the weakest markets. Small cap stocks lost ground in the month but outperformed the board market indices. Sector dispersion was relatively modest with defensive sectors (utilities and consumer staples) leading for the month. Information technology and consumer discretionary shares lagged. Factor performance reflected investor trepidation as low beta and less volatile stocks outperformed in December. Value measures enjoyed a second strong month and were the best performing factor for the year in both developed and emerging markets. Beyond preference for defensive, value stocks, emerging and developed markets showed divergence in investor factor preferences. Growth measures sold off in developed markets, most notably in Japan but were favoured in emerging markets. Price momentum lagged again in emerging markets even after the extraordinary sell-off in November. Stocks with favourable sell-side analyst revisions underperformed in developed markets but were favoured in emerging markets. Quality measures were favoured in developed markets but showed mixed results in the emerging markets.
The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund underperformed its MSCI All Country World Index benchmark (net of fees in AUD terms) during the month. Sector positioning accounted modestly for the performance, while stock selection detracted. Stock selection was led by holdings in the energy sector. Holdings in industrials and materials were the largest detractors. Allocation wise, the underweight to energy added the most value, which was offset by the underweight to materials.
Regionally, selection was strongest in Canada, and weakest in the United States and China. Stocks that made the largest contribution to return included Japan Tobacco (JT), whose shares rallied over the month after the company and Altria Group accounted a joint venture to commercialise Ploom heated tobacco sticks products in the US. In our view, integration of the domestic tobacco business into JT will enhance the company’s competitive position in reduced risk products and organisational restructuring of the domestic tobacco business will free up some resources for RRP marketing and R&D investment. Japan Post delivered a strong month reaching its six-month peak. The Japanese government has financial and political incentives to ensure that the environment supporting the company’s profitability remains benign. Gilead Sciences continued its strong performance following solid third-quarter results that displayed the strength of the company’s dominant HIV regimen as well as oncology therapies. Sales were well ahead of market expectations, mostly due to continuing demand for the company’s COVID-19 drug. Detractors in the month included Kellogg, whose share price fell following Q3 2022 results.
The organic growth of 13% was largely driven by higher prices. Similar to its peers, Kellogg has strained to keep up with the rapid evolution of consumer trends which has weighed on volume growth. Public Storage’s stock continued to struggle throughout the month despite a decent set of numbers in the third quarter earnings results. We see increasing signs of growth moderation in the upcoming years with a slowing economy and additional storage supply coming to market. Molina Healthcare’s shares saw significant movement during recent months, with the share price falling after the third quarter earnings call.
In October, the Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund returned 5.7 (net of fees) underperforming its MSCI All Country Index benchmark by 1.0%. Stock selection accounted for the performance, while sector positioning detracted. Stock selection was favorable in five of eleven sectors, led by consumer discretionary and communication services. Allocation wise, the underweight to consumer discretionary and overweight to health care added the most value, which was partially offset by the underweight to energy. Regionally, selection was strongest in the US, and weakest in Japan and Canada. Stocks that made the largest contribution to return included Gilead Sciences, whose shares rose significantly by 13% after reporting third quarter results which topped expectations and boosted its full- year profit and sales outlook. The company generates stellar profit margins with its HIV and HCV portfolios, which require only a small salesforce and inexpensive manufacturing. Merck announced positive top-line results from the pivotal phase 3 Stellar trail evaluating the safety and efficacy of sotatercept. The stock rallied throughout the month. Shares of Everest rebounded strongly in October, responding positively to the third quarter earning calls. The reinsurer consistently grows its portfolio without substantially changing the risk profile. The management is targeting over 13% shareholder returns by 2023. Detractors in the month included WH Group, which reported third-quarter results that trailed the market’s estimates of revenue and operating profit. The deterioration in the operating margin was primarily caused by the upstream business across China and the US. Yamazaki Baking reported the third quarter earnings in the month and the result missed analysts’ forecasts. Bread companies in Japan have been hit hard by soaring material prices, as well as the declining population. SinoPac Financial reported missed performance for the first half of the year. The weakening in financial markets has generally led to a decline in banks’ wealth management business.
The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund lost 0.49% during the month outperforming its MSCI All Country World Index benchmark by 3.09%. Both sector positioning and stock selection accounted for the excess return. Stock selection was favorable in all sectors led by health care and industrials. Sector allocation was helped by the underweight to information technology and overweight in consumer staples. Utilities holdings was the only sector that underperformed.
Stocks that provided the largest benefit to the Fund’s excess return were all in the health care sector. Bristol-Myers Squibb announced scientific research across several solid tumors and received European Commission approval of Opdualag in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. A few analysts upgraded its ratings to overweight or buy during the month. Merck delivered a great month led by their blockbuster Keytruda as well as other oncology and vaccine recovery. There are some regulatory risks on Keytruda, but we believe, they are limited in the medium term. Eli Lilly continued its strong price momentum reporting favorable phase 3 results for a dermatitis medication. The company also received the first and only RET inhibitor approval from the FDA. Stocks that detracted in the month included Charter Communications, the judge order of USD 1.15 billion and the announcement of the retirement plan of the CEO cost the company’s price declined 28% in September. Comcast Corporation’s broadband business has stagnated, with the company adding no net subscribers over the most recently reported periods, as the demand seen through the COVID pandemic cooled off. Portland General Electric’s price suffered a sharp decline after the company shut off power for 37,000 customers in early September to protect against wildfires.
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details