JPMorgan Diversified Risk is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Credit Suisse AllHedge Fund Index and sits inside the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The JPMorgan Diversified Risk has Assets Under Management of 0.38 M with a management fee of 0.7%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the JPMorgan Diversified Risk has returned in the last month. The previous three years have returned annualised and each year since inception, which is when the JPMorgan Diversified Risk first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since JPMorgan Diversified Risk first started, the Sharpe ratio is with an annualised volatility of . The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is and since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The JPMorgan Diversified Risk has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index of and since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. JPMorgan Diversified Risk has produced Alpha over the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index of in the last 12 months and since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
JPMorgan Diversified Risk has a correlation coefficient of and a beta of when compared to the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on JPMorgan Diversified Risk and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on JPMorgan Diversified Risk compared to the Credit Suisse AllHedge Fund Index, you can click here.
To sort and compare the JPMorgan Diversified Risk financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the JPMorgan Diversified Risk. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
Following strong performance in June, the fund retracted some of its gains in July. The momentum style was the leading detractor, followed by the carry style. The quality factor was broadly flat, while the value factor contributed positively.
The single-stock equity factors were negative in aggregate. Individually, equity relative value momentum was the leading detractor. This was partially offset by gains to equity value, which, despite an equity market backdrop that has been broadly favourable for large cap growth, is nonetheless slightly positive for the year-to-date period.
The carry style detracted, driven by FX carry on negative returns from short exposures in the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Commodity carry was modestly negative, while credit carry was flat.
Fixed income relative value factors were flat. This reflects continued low levels of risk exposure as fixed income value and carry continue to largely offset each other.
The macro momentum-based factors were a modest positive in aggregate. Equity trend was the leading contributor as the net long positioning helped performance during the market rally. Fixed income trend was also positive. In contrast, FX momentum detracted as gains from a Japanese yen long position were offset by a loss from a short position in the Norwegian krone. Commodity trend was modestly negative.
Following strong performance in June, the fund retracted some of its gains in July. The momentum style was the leading detractor, followed by the carry style. The quality factor was broadly flat, while the value factor contributed positively.
The single-stock equity factors were negative in aggregate. Individually, equity relative value momentum was the leading detractor. This was partially offset by gains to equity value, which, despite an equity market backdrop that has been broadly favourable for large cap growth, is nonetheless slightly positive for the year-to-date period.
The carry style detracted, driven by FX carry on negative returns from short exposures in the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Commodity carry was modestly negative, while credit carry was flat.
Fixed income relative value factors were flat. This reflects continued low levels of risk exposure as fixed income value and carry continue to largely offset each other.
The macro momentum-based factors were a modest positive in aggregate. Equity trend was the leading contributor as the net long positioning helped performance during the market rally. Fixed income trend was also positive. In contrast, FX momentum detracted as gains from a Japanese yen long position were offset by a loss from a short position in the Norwegian krone. Commodity trend was modestly negative.
The fund delivered strong returns in June. The momentum style was the leading contributor, followed by the value and carry styles. Quality factor was flat.
The macro momentum-based factors contributed positively. Equity trend was the leading contributor, as the net long positioning helped performance during the market rally in June. Fixed income trend also contributed positively, recovering the previous month’s losses. In contrast, FX momentum modestly detracted, driven by a short position in the Norwegian krone and Australian dollar. Similarly, the commodity trend, which was positioned short, was modestly negative in June.
The single stock equity factors contributed positively in aggregate. Individually, equity value, which has been volatile year-to-date, was the leading contributor, offsetting the decline during the more challenging month of May. The equity relative-value momentum was also positive, potentially capturing the outperformance in growth stocks, while the quality factor was flat.
The carry style was also positive in June. FX carry was the strongest performer, driven by positive returns from long exposures in the Norwegian krone and Canadian dollar. Credit carry was a leading detractor while commodity carry was flat.
Fixed income relative value factors were modestly down. The carry factor was more adversely impacted than value, as gains made by short exposures in Sweden and the US 10-year swaps, were offset by long exposures in Australia and Denmark.
The fund was modestly down in May. The carry style was the leading contributor while value and momentum detracted.
The carry style was the leading contributor to performance. FX carry was the strongest performer, driven by positive returns from short exposures in the euro and Japanese yen. This was supported by gains from fixed income carry, due to short exposures in the US and Sweden. Commodity carry also contributed while credit carry was flat.
The single stock equity factors detracted in aggregate. Individually, equity value was the leading detractor, retracing its gains from April, reflecting a volatile period of performance year-to-date. The equity relative-value momentum was positive, backed by the rally in growth stocks. The quality factor was flat.
Likewise, fixed income value was negative, driven by long exposures in Australia, the US and the UK 10-year swaps, which was partly balanced by a short exposure in Sweden.
The macro momentum-based factors detracted, as most underlying asset classes struggled. Fixed income trend saw the most significant decline, as the factor continued to deal with the lack of clear trend in fixed income markets. FX momentum also detracted, driven by a long position in the euro and a short position in the Swedish krone. The net long position in equity trend hurt performance, as markets pulled back in May. Commodity trend contributed positively.
The fund delivered strong returns with positive performance across all underlying styles. The carry style was the leading contributor but was supported by decent gains to both value and momentum.
The carry style’s strong month was underpinned by gains spread across credit, fixed income and FX. Credit carry benefitted from continued strength in credit markets. FX carry contributed, driven by gains within emerging markets, while it was softer in G10 countries. In fixed income carry, a short exposure in the UK 10-year swap and a long exposure in Australia helped performance. Commodity carry was flat.
The single stock equity factors were positive in aggregate. Individually, equity value was the leading contributor in April. The quality factor was modestly positive, while equity relative-value momentum was flat.
The macro momentum-based factors contributed, with mixed underlying asset class performance. FX momentum led performance, driven by a long position in the euro and a short position in the Norwegian krone. A net long position in equity trend helped, as markets were positive. Fixed income trend was the most significant negative, as modestly short duration exposure was adversely impacted by lower government bond yields, as inflation dynamics in the US showed signs of improvement. Commodity trend was flat.
Fixed income value was positive, primarily driven by a short exposure in the UK and long exposure in the Australian 10-year swaps.
After a strong February, the fund retraced some of its gains and ended the month down. The value and momentum styles detracted but were partially offset by gains in the carry and quality styles.
The macro momentum-based factors were the leading detractors. The fixed income trend was the most significant negative as the short duration exposure was adversely impacted by a flight to quality that drove government bond yields lower. The net long position in the equity trend initially detracted and was then whipsawed by a rebound. The commodity trend was flat, while FX momentum contributed modestly, driven by long positions in the euro and UK sterling.
The single-stock equity factors were a small negative in aggregate. Equity value was a leading detractor as macroeconomic moves appeared to favour growth or higher-quality names. This was reflected in positive contributions to both equity relative-value momentum, a leading contributor, and the quality factor.
Fixed income value detracted, driven by short exposures in Sweden, the UK and Denmark 10-year swaps.
The carry style was a contributor to performance. Credit carry was the leading performer, benefitting from strength in credit spreads. FX carry contributed; a long position in the Canadian dollar helped performance. Fixed income carry was positive, driven by gains from long exposures to Australia and Denmark 10-year swaps. Commodity carry was flat.
The fund delivered strong returns in February. Performance was positive across most underlying factors, with no significant detractors. Value, momentum and quality styles contributed, while the carry style was a small detractor.
The single stock equity factors were in aggregate additive; performance was positive across underlying factors. Individually, equity value was the leading contributor, followed by the equity relative-value-momentum factor. The quality factor also was also up in February.
Fixed income value also contributed positively, driven primarily by short exposures in Sweden and Danish 10-year swaps. The macro momentum-based factors were positive in aggregate. Fixed income trend was positive, as the net short-duration exposure of -2.3 years benefitted from rising yields. FX momentum contributed, driven by short positions in the Norwegian krone and Canadian dollar. Commodity trend was also positive, driven by implied short exposures to agriculture and energy sub-groups. The net long position in equity trend however detracted, as stock markets fell.
The carry style was a small detractor to performance, although moves across the underlying factors were modest. Fixed income carry was modestly down: losses from long exposures to Denmark and Australia were largely balanced by gains on short exposures to UK and Swedish. FX carry also detracted; the long position in the New Zealand dollar hurt performance. Commodity carry was modestly negative while credit carry was flat.
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details