Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A (GTU0109AU) Report & Performance

What is the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A fund?

The Invesco Wholesale Global Targeted Returns Fund aims to achieve a positive total return in all market conditions, targeting a gross return of 5% p.a. above the Bloomberg Ausbond Bank Bill Index with less than half the volatility of global equities over rolling three-year periods. The Strategy’s investment philosophy is based on the belief that positive total returns can be achieved across all market environments over a rolling three year period through an unconstrained approach to sourcing return ideas and through robust risk management. The GTR portfolio can have from five up to around 50 ideas at any one time (typically between 20 and 30).

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A

Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A Fund Commentary December 31, 2022

Contributors to performance
The strategy underperformed benchmark for the period.

Strategic exposure to the growth macro factor detracted from results for the period as all six markets in which the strategy invests saw index levels decline. US small caps were the primary detractor to results due to its higher beta profile and sector exposure which overweights higher duration equity segments relative to other markets. Japan equities struggled as the Bank of Japan (BOJ) announced that it was going to widen the band in which the 10 year yield could move. This set off concerns that the BOJ was likely to embark on a tightening cycle.

US large caps fell in the period alongside US small caps as the Federal Reserve (Fed) raised rates 50 basis points in its December meeting. European stocks detracted a similar amount as the European Central Bank (ECB) also tightened by 50 basis points. Emerging market ate into results, but to a lesser extent than other markets as the scrapping of zero-Covid policy by China was seen as a positive development. UK equities were the best relative performer despite a 50 basis point hike by the Bank of England (BOE) during its December meeting. Given the tough environment for equity markets, our defensive put structure was able to mitigate some of the declines.

Strategic exposure to the defense macro factor was the lead detractor from results for the month. All six bond markets in which the strategy invests saw yields rise over the period. The rise was tied to the continued tightening stance taken by central banks. As previously mentioned, the Fed, ECB and BOE all raised rates in the period. There were joined by the Bank of Canada (BOC) which raised by 50 basis points and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) which raised 25 basis points. In addition to the rate increases, the post announcement language from the respective central bank heads was uniformly hawkish noting the persistently high levels of inflation. These comments came even as evidence for looming recessions continue to mount. While the BOJ has yet to joint its counterparts in raising rates, its announcement regarding widening the allowable yield bands for its 10 year government bond produced an outsized loss relative to what investors have come to expect over an extended period of time. Our exposure to defensive factor premia produced a minor offset to the losses in fixed income as the factors generated returns marginally higher than their respective base indexes.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns AGTU0109AUManaged FundsAlternativesMacroAlternatives - Macro IndexCredit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index1.08 BN0.95%0.00%0.3%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A1.93%3.36%12.2%3.48%1.99%6.01%6.9%4.66%-2.28%-7.84%-10.36%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns AAlternatives - Macro Index11.72%-0.4%NA%NA%NA%0.426.52%4.44%0.290.38

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns AYes-https://www.invesco.com.au/home-

Product Due Diligence

What is Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A

Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Credit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index and sits inside the Alternatives - Macro Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A has Assets Under Management of 1.08 BN with a management fee of 0.95%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.3%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A has returned 1.93% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 3.48% annualised and 4.66% each year since inception, which is when the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 4.66%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -2.28% and -10.36% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Alternatives - Macro Index of 11.72% and -0.4% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A has produced Alpha over the Alternatives - Macro Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Alternatives - Macro Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A provide?

Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A has a correlation coefficient of 0.38 and a beta of 0.42 when compared to the Alternatives - Macro Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A with the Credit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index?

For a full quantitative report on Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A compared to the Credit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A?

If you would like to get in contact with the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Invesco WS Global Targeted Returns A. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - November 30, 2022

Performance was positive for the month. Our more ‘risk-on’ ideas benefited from surging equity markets.

The standout equity ideas were ‘Equity -Japan’, ‘Equity – UK’ and our Asian and Australian equity ideas. Equally strong were our selective credit and US high yield ideas. On the downside, the risk on move meant our idea preferring US small caps to US large caps underperformed, as well as a number of ideas where we are short equities, for example in India and European industrials and insurers. A rallying oil price also boosted our currency idea preferring the Norwegian krone to the British pound. However, this strong move in oil meant our ‘Commodity – Commodity Short’ detracted.

Performance Commentary - October 31, 2022

‘Inflation – Short UK’ has been the strongest performer, recovering a portion of the losses accrued over the course of the year. The appointment of new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and his new more conservative fiscal policy were welcomed by markets, allowing investors to pare back some of the very elevated inflation expectations that had been priced in as a result of the “mini-budget announcement from the Truss administration. This idea has now been removed from the portfolio.

‘Currency – New Zealand vs Australia’ also delivered positive results for the fund. Slowing demand out of China for Australian exports, declining commodity prices and the RBA’s ongoing signalling to markets over its unwillingness (or inability) to hike rates at the same pace as the Fed or the ECB have exercised a negative pressure on the Australian dollar over the period. The recently introduced ‘Equity – Equity Dividends’ idea also contributed positively, largely benefitting from a recovery in risk appetite over the month.

US CPI saw a mild surprise to the upside in September at 8.2% compared to consensus of 8.1%, with European inflation also coming in hotter than expected. This contributed to bond yields moving higher. Our ‘Interest Rates – US long term’ idea detracted as a result. After a strong period of positive performance, our ‘Volatility – FX Volatility’ idea pared back some of the gains in October. ‘Equity – European Infrastructure’ also came under pressure over the month due to ongoing energy crisis in Europe and tensions between Russian and the West.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

Our long exposure to the US Dollar performed strongly, as risk averse investors sought a perceived “safe haven” currency. Expectations that the Fed would hike rates more aggressively than other central banks supported the dollar on a relative basis. ‘Currency – US Dollar vs Asia’ was the strongest performing idea. Increased recession fears and downside economic risk favoured exposure to more resilient businesses in the US with stronger balance sheets over those constrained by weak cash flows, refinancing issues and debt servicing. ‘Equity – Strong Balance Sheets vs Market’ benefitted as a result.

The increased divergence in monetary policy expectations across regions has led to an increase in the level of volatility among currencies, benefiting our ‘Volatility – Global FX Volatility’ idea. ‘Interest Rates – Australia vs US’ was another notable performer over the quarter as short term yields in Australia fell more than their US counterpart on the back of dovish comments from the Reserve Bank of Australia which indicated that it will moderate the pace of tightening going forward as economic growth slows and housing activity moderates. After a difficult period in August, ‘Inflation – Short UK’ recovered the bulk of the losses in September.

Persistent inflation and more hawkish central banks than expected meant that fixed income and risk assets faced increased headwinds. The fund’s long credit ideas detracted from overall performance being negatively impacted by widening credit spreads and rising bond yields. ‘Credit – US High Yield’, ‘Credit – US Investment Grade’ and ‘Credit – Selective Credit’ all detracted by a similar order of magnitude. The rise in bond yields also exercised a negative pressure on our ‘Interest Rates – Selective EM Debt’ and ‘Interest Rates – US’ ideas.

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2022

Being long the US Dollar was a positive contributing factor, with the currency being buoyed by its perceived ‘safe haven’ status coupled with expectations that the US Fed would be more aggressive in their tightening path relative to other central banks. Our long US Dollar positions vs a basket of Asian currencies, the South African Rand and the UK Pound contributed the most. ‘Equity: European Banks’ also delivered positive results as we were able to reduce our exposure and lock in gains before markets started to sell-off in the second part of the month.

‘Inflation: Short UK’ was one of the largest detractors in August as another jump in food and energy prices helped exacerbate inflation in the eurozone to multi-year highs. ‘Interest Rates: Global Steepener’ also detracted from overall performance after short-end rates spiked relative to long-end rates as investors digested hawkish comments by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell at the central bank’s annual symposium in Jackson Hole. Given the move higher in bond yields, ‘Interest Rates: US’ also ended the period in negative territory. Directional ideas within credit, most notably ‘Credit: US Investment Grade’ and ‘Credit: Selective Credit’ underperformed given the move higher in bond yields and a widening of credit spreads.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

Our ‘Inflation – Short UK’ idea registered a steady recovery following May’s decline as investor’s may be starting to price in the possibility of peak inflation. Given its defensive characteristics, ‘Equity – Strong Balance Sheets vs Market’ benefitted from the negative market environment as more resilient businesses with stronger balance sheets outperformed those constrained by weak cash flows, refinancing issues and debt servicing. ‘Currency – US Dollar vs Asia’ and ‘Currency – US Dollar vs UK Pound’ contributed the most. The increased divergence in monetary policy expectations across regions has increased the level of volatility within currencies, benefitting our ‘Volatility – Global FX Volatility ‘ idea.

At the other end, ‘Credit – US High Yield’ and ‘Credit – Selective Credit’ were amongst the main detractors over the period, being negatively impacted by a material widening in credit spreads and rising bond yields. Directional equity ideas also came under pressure in June with ‘Equity – European Infrastructure’, ‘Equity – European Banks’ and ‘Equity – Diversified Alpha’ leading the losses.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2022

The Fund returned -4.09% in May 2022.

• The moves of major currencies during the first half of the quarter were partially reversed in May as China began to loosen its Covid-19 restrictions, and European central bankers took a more hawkish tone. During the month, the euro bounced off its five-year lows versus the US dollar, and the Australian dollar broke its one-year low versus the US dollar. P/E’s factors continue to indicate stronger growth in the US versus other parts of the world, and a strengthening of the US dollar, especially against the euro and the yen. • Currently, the main factors driving FX positioning are 1) relative growth expectations, where countries with higher growth expectations are more attractive, 2) long term rates, where higher rates are more attractive, and 3) capital flows, where investors have been buying US assets versus those of Europe or Asia.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2022

From a factor and style perspective, Growth underperformed the most as bond yields continued to rise, challenging the lofty valuations of some of these names under this new higher rate environment. Subsequently, the technology sector was the worst-performing. At the other end, defensive parts of the market, as well as Value sectors, fared better, e.g., consumer staples, utilities, health care, and energy. It was also a challenging month for bond markets with spiraling inflation putting further pressure on central banks to apply a more aggressive approach to raising interest rates. Against this backdrop, US treasuries extended their losing streak for a fifth straight month. Sovereign bonds in Europe also lost ground. In terms of yields, the 10-year Treasury note increased from 2.34% to 2.93%, with 10-year gilts moving from 1.61% to 1.91% and the 10-year German bund rose from 0.55% to 0.94%.

As highlighted earlier, the US Dollar performed strongly over the month, benefitting our ‘Currency – US Dollar vs Asia’, ‘Currency – US Dollar vs UK Pound’ and ‘Currency – US Dollar vs Euro’ ideas. The substantial repricing of interest rate hike expectations was a natural catalyst for a move higher in volatility across asset classes, including FX. Our ‘Volatility – Global FX Volatility’ idea performed well against this backdrop. The defensive characteristics of the ‘Equity – Strong Balance Sheets vs Market’ idea proved to be useful during a period where negative investor sentiment dominated market price action. At the other end, ‘Currency – Japanese Yen vs US Dollar’ was the main detractor in April as modest inflation in Japan relative to the US prompted the Bank of Japan to continue to keep interest rates at current or lower levels for the foreseeable future. As a result, the Yen depreciated to multi-year lows against the Dollar. ‘Interest Rates – Emerging Market Debt’ also detracted from performance with our long exposure to local currency Mexican government bonds (currency hedged) proving to be the main drag. Sentiment towards Mexican debt deteriorated over the month driven by higher interest rate hike expectations after data showed annual inflation touching multi-decade highs. The spread to US Treasuries has however remained flat over the year. ‘Interest Rate – Yield Compression’ was another detractor with ‘Equity – China’ and ‘Credit – US High Yield’ also naturally underperforming in light of the risk-off market environment.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee