Invesco Global Real Estate A is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Dvlp Global Real Estate and sits inside the Property - Unlisted and Direct Property Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Invesco Global Real Estate A has Assets Under Management of 12.52 M with a management fee of 1.45%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Invesco Global Real Estate A has returned -0.29% in the last month. The previous three years have returned -2.92% annualised and 6.95% each year since inception, which is when the Invesco Global Real Estate A first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Invesco Global Real Estate A first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 6.95%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -10.14% and -15.75% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Invesco Global Real Estate A has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Property - Unlisted and Direct Property Index of -8.28% and -1.92% since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Invesco Global Real Estate A has produced Alpha over the Property - Unlisted and Direct Property Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Property - Unlisted and Direct Property Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
Invesco Global Real Estate A has a correlation coefficient of 0.47 and a beta of 0.8 when compared to the Property - Unlisted and Direct Property Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on Invesco Global Real Estate A and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on Invesco Global Real Estate A compared to the Dvlp Global Real Estate, you can click here.
To sort and compare the Invesco Global Real Estate A financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Invesco Global Real Estate A. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
The fund produced a positive gross total return in August. Equity positioning was the main negative contributor to listed real estate performance, and the overall fixed income performance was also negative during the month of August. The USD appreciated by approximately 3.7% versus the AUD in August. On the trailing 12-month basis, the USD appreciated by circa 5.9%.
Gross total returns for the month of July were negative. The direct real estate holdings released the first quarter 2023 performance in July, resulting in a -180 bps impact to the Fund. Listed real estate produced a gross total return of 3.2% in July. Equity positioning was the main positive contributor to listed real estate performance, and the overall fixed income performance was also positive during the month of July.
Gross total returns for the month of June were slightly negative. Listed real estate produced a gross total return of 1.44% in June. Equity positioning was the main positive contributor to listed real estate performance, and the overall fixed income performance was also positive during the month of June.
Returns for the month of May were slightly positive. Listed real estate produced a gross total return of -2.97% in May. Equity positioning was the main negative contributor to listed real estate performance, and the overall fixed income performance was also negative during the month of May. The USD appreciated approximately 1.7% versus the AUD in May. On the trailing 12-month basis, the USD appreciated circa 10.9%.
The Fund’s allocation to direct real estate was 77% as at 31 May 2023. The 23% liquidity sleeve allocation at month end was split as 16% to listed real estate and 7% to cash-like investments (all allocation figure are approximate).
Gross total returns for the month of April were slightly negative. The direct real estate holdings released the first quarter 2023 performance on April 25, resulting in a -228 bps impact to the Fund. Listed real estate produced a gross total return of 2.71% in April. Equity positioning was the main positive contributor to listed real estate performance, and the overall fixed income performance was also positive during the month of April.
For the month of March, GREF produced a slightly negative total gross return. Listed real estate produced a gross return of -3.63% (in USD terms), whilst direct real estate values were unchanged.
Gross total returns for the month of February were positive in AUD. Listed real estate produced a negative gross total return in February. Equity positioning was the main negative contributor to listed real estate performance, and the overall fixed income performance was also negative during the month of February
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details