Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) has Assets Under Management of 234.49 M with a management fee of 1.2%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.2%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) has returned 1.06% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 2.7% annualised and 11.59% each year since inception, which is when the Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 11.59%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -7.5% and -24.53% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index of -2.86% and -0.69% since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) has a correlation coefficient of 0.94 and a beta of 1.36 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.
To sort and compare the Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg) financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Cooper Investors Global Eqs Fd (Unhdg). All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
The Portfolio rose by 4.1% over the December quarter, compared to the Benchmark return of 5.6%. For the Financial Year to December 2022, the Portfolio rose by 0.9% whilst the Benchmark declined by 2.7%. Our China and Hong Kong holdings detracted 73bps of outperformance. After lagging the global and other Asian markets for over a year, the Chinese markets regained some lost ground and rose by 8.6% over the December quarter on optimism around China re-opening.
Our Portfolio stocks gained 7%, as shares of AIA Group, Pinduoduo, and YUM China rose. As this letter went to print, nearly all COVID restrictions were lifted in China. Flights and trains resumed, offices re-opened, and quarantine and testing requirements were scrapped. We are pleased to see the final commitment to opening after one year of back-and-forth policy changes. However, three years of strict lockdowns had left indelible marks. Jobs that were lost could not be regained overnight. Businesses that shut also take time to re-open. We continue to observe significant financial pressure on businesses, consumers and local governments. Value for money becomes the most important element in purchasing decisions.
The Portfolio declined by 3.0% over the September quarter, compared to the Benchmark decline of 7.8%.
Our China and Hong Kong holdings attributed 300bps of outperformance. The Chinese markets continue to underperform the overall region, declining by 16% compared to 8% for broader Asia. Both our capital allocation (the Portfolio is less exposed to China than the index) and stock picks (our Chinese holdings also fared better than the market) added value. China Mobile, Yum China and YTO Express were the notable contributors, whilst China Meidong, China Mengniu, and Yili detracted from performance. We wrote in our last letter that a large part of our underperformance during the June quarter was due to our portfolio ‘missing out’ on the excitement of re-opening post COVID.
We were confident that although our companies were not the hot ‘re-opening’ stocks, gradually normalizing operating conditions will suit them well over the long term. Our portfolio did not disappoint us – the June reporting period was a good one, with over 80% of our companies beating the expectations (albeit low ones) by a wide margin. Their outlook for the future also remains optimistic. Take Tencent as an example. It recorded a small revenue decline of 3% during the June quarter, mostly driven by declining advertising revenues as Shanghai (the center for advertising in the country) was in lockdown. However, this was better than feared and more importantly, exciting new revenue streams are emerging for the first time in 18 months. Tencent’s video account advertising product is ramping up fast, enjoying a lot of user time and attention and just started to monetize. Tencent is confident in its ability to implement cost discipline and restart profit growth ‘regardless of the state of the macro economy”. Its management team is also putting their money where their mouth is – over the past few months, Tencent is liquidating its investments in other companies to buy back its own shares. Using their own words, “our stock is the best investment we can find in the market today”.
China Mobile is another good example. It reported a solid set of June results, with service revenues and EBITDA both growing a healthy clip of 7-8%. It also announced raising the dividend payout ratio from the current 58% to 70% or above in 2023, one year ahead of expectations. The strategic shift from heavy capex investment to capital return is very meaningful – as of 1H’21 the payout ratio was still less than 50%. China Mobile’s current dividend yield is 9%, and likely to rise further to 10% and beyond in 2023.
The Portfolio declined by 5.7% over the quarter, compared to the Benchmark decline of 0.63%. 90% of the underperformance came from China, where the Chinese markets performed well and gained 12% during the quarter.
The Portfolio has less exposure to China than our Benchmark, and holds defensive companies that do not benefit quickly when the economy first re-opens. With a return to normalcy and no further major lockdowns, our Portfolio holdings will stand to do well. Outside of China, Southeast Asia, India, Korea and Taiwan suffered declines ranging from 6% to 13%. Our stocks in these regions, in aggregate, performed roughly on par to the Benchmark.
For the 12 months ended in June 2022, the Portfolio declined by 26%, compared to the Benchmark decline of 18%. We share the deep disappointment with our investors – CI staff are the largest group of unit holders of our Fund. Quite a number of large Portfolio holdings performed strongly over the 2020-2021 period, as winners during the pandemic. Examples include private hospitals in India, or an eCommerce company in Taiwan. As their strong operating performance continued, their valuation multiples also rose to historically high levels. Both the relative performance and valuation multiple took a sharp negative turn as the Asian economies re-opened.
We suffered the curse of the round-ticket journey. Our Portfolio companies grew earnings by 15% over the past 12 months. This was achieved against generally weak GDP growth in the region. We expect these earnings to grow at a more modest but still attractive level of 8% in the next 12 months. Our Portfolio management teams lived up to expectations under strenuous testing. They doubled down on long term strategy, pivoted, problem solved and found solutions in the austerity. They worked around the clock tirelessly and kept their employees safe and productive, the factories running and customers happy. They also uphold high governance standards by giving shareholders full and transparent disclosure.
The largest detractors to return for the quarter were Ferguson, API Group and IQVIA, all of which sold off ~15-20% though no company specific news. Finally the quarter saw high currency volatility with a strong Australian dollar bucking the usual pattern of weakness during times of a market sell-off. The AUD gained ~4% against the USD, ~6% against Euro and Pound, and ~10% against the Japanese Yen.
The portfolio is positioned around Subsets of Value:
• Stalwarts (32% of the portfolio) – sturdy, strong and generally larger companies with world class privileged market and competitive positions (AON).
• Growth companies (35%) – growing companies with identifiable value propositions using traditional value metrics and run by focused, prudent and experienced management (Costco).
• Bond like equities (4%) – stocks with secure, low-volatile dividends that can be grown and recapture inflationary effects over time (Ferrovial).
• Low risk turnarounds (5%) – sound businesses with good management and balance sheets. (Vontier).
• Asset plays (3%) – stocks with strong or improving balance sheets trading at discounts to net asset value or replacement value (Sony Corp).
• Cyclicals (17%) – stocks showing both upside and downside leverage to the cycle with experienced and contrarian managers who allocate capital prudently (Ferguson).
The portfolio is positioned around Subsets of Value:
• Stalwarts (35% of the portfolio) – sturdy, strong and generally larger companies with world class privileged market and competitive positions (AON).
• Growth companies (38%) – growing companies with identifiable value propositions using traditional value metrics and run by focused, prudent and experienced management (Costco).
• Bond like equities (2%) – stocks with secure, low-volatile dividends that can be grown and recapture inflationary effects over time (Ferrovial).
• Low risk turnarounds (7%) – sound businesses with good management and balance sheets. (Cerner).
• Asset plays (4%) – stocks with strong or improving balance sheets trading at discounts to net asset value or replacement value (Sony Corp).
• Cyclicals (11%) – stocks showing both upside and downside leverage to the cycle with experienced and contrarian managers who allocate capital prudently (Ferguson).
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details