SMSF
Gareth Lane 
Troy Burns Mate Checked
This information has been reviewed by our SMSF Mates before it was published as part of our review process.
Have you considered selling property from your Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF) to yourself? The short answer is indeed, yes, you can, but it must meet specific conditions and align with the stringent guidelines set by the Australian Taxation Office. While this presents an appealing opportunity, the complexities involved demand careful scrutiny.
Navigating the rules, considering the tax outcomes, assessing potential risks, and identifying the benefits are all vital. This understanding starts with getting to know the Australian Taxation Office’s guidelines for such transactions.
In our exploration of SMSFs, we delve into the integral role of investment properties, the potential tax outcomes from their sales, and the specific regulations governing residential properties. Our journey is aimed at bringing clarity to these processes, emphasising the importance of professional advice, and demonstrating how such a sale could harmonise with your self-managed superannuation fund’s objectives.
Jump to a specific part of this page:
A Self Managed Superannuation Fund is a private retirement fund, the management of which lies with the fund’s member or members. The primary objective of an SMSF is to provide retirement benefits to the members involved. If you’re interested in establishing such a fund, it’s advantageous to learn how to set up a SMSF to ensure you’re starting off on the right foot.
An essential element of an SMSF portfolio can be purchase property for investment, including both residential and commercial property types. These properties act as substantial financial assets that can grow over time and provide a substantial source of income upon retirement.
These properties serve a crucial role: generating income for retirement. They function as long-term investments that contribute towards the goal of financial stability in the later stages of life.
This financial stability is critical for enjoying a comfortable and worry-free retirement. However, it’s essential to consider the broader context of SMSF property purchased for investment when thinking about selling a property from an SMSF to oneself.
It’s permissible to sell a property from an SMSF to its member, albeit under certain conditions. The transaction should occur at ‘arm’s length’, which means it should proceed as if between two unrelated parties, and the transaction must align with a market value supported by an independent valuation.
This is to ensure fairness and legality in the transaction process, maintaining the integrity of the SMSF and the member’s retirement benefits. It’s also worth noting that the SMSF’s trust deed and investment strategy must sanction such property transactions.
Selling a property to oneself, when done correctly, can align with an SMSF’s overarching investment strategy.
The term “arm’s length” refers to a deal where both parties, acting independently and without a relationship, determine the property’s sale price based on its true market value. This principle is essential within Australian SMSFs to ensure the integrity of the fund and its retirement benefits provision.
Grasping the potential tax implications is crucial when dealing with transactions within self-managed superannuation funds. One key concept to grapple with is capital gains tax (CGT) which can be triggered when selling an investment property from your SMSF.
When an investment property within an SMSF is sold, it potentially attracts CGT. The process of determining CGT is intricate and affected by various factors such as the period the property has been retained within the SMSF and the fund’s earnings.
Appreciating the tax consequences can ensure the transaction aligns with the SMSF’s primary objective of providing retirement benefits and does not inadvertently undermine the member’s financial planning.
An important aspect of managing your SMSF’s investments is the categorisation of certain properties as in house assets. The categorisation of certain properties as in-house assets plays a pivotal role in managing your SMSF’s investments.
Within an SMSF, an in-house asset often takes the form of a loan, an investment, or a property lease extended to a party related to the fund. The categorisation of certain properties as in-house assets is an important aspect of managing your SMSF’s investments.
An in-house asset within an SMSF context may encompass a loan, an investment, or a lease of property to a party related to the fund. In compliance with Australian regulations, these in-house assets are carefully regulated, their combined value not permitted to exceed 5% of the fund’s total assets.
This regulation acts as a safeguard against the over-concentration of assets tied to the fund’s members, thus ensuring the fund’s stability and enhancing its potential for sustainable long-term growth. Nevertheless, maintaining this delicate balance necessitates diligent monitoring to circumvent inadvertent breaches of these regulations, which could potentially result in severe implications.
The constraints also apply to what is known as business real property. Typically, this refers to assets like land or buildings, which can include your own business premises, exclusively employed in running a business.
Suppose you’re an SMSF member and a business owner, and your SMSF buys property that your business utilises. In this case, this property falls under the business real property category. Transactions of this nature are allowed, as long as they’re conducted at market value.
An important facet of managing an SMSF is understanding the rules governing the residential properties within it. These rules are outlined in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act, more commonly known as the SISA rules.
According to these regulations, residential properties purchased by an SMSF cannot be lived in or rented out by the fund member or any related party. This restriction maintains the property’s role in serving the SMSF’s primary purpose, that is, providing retirement benefits.
When considering selling a residential property from an SMSF to oneself, it’s imperative to consider how these rules apply. Such a transaction comes with its own set of restrictions and requirements, which should be thoroughly understood to maintain the SMSF’s compliance status.
Non-compliance can lead to serious legal consequences and may undermine the retirement benefits of the SMSF, negating the purpose of setting up the fund in the first place.
Selling property from your SMSF to yourself is feasible under specific conditions, but it is far from straightforward. The transaction must align with the primary objective of your SMSF: securing retirement benefits.
The complexity of the process, along with aspects like acquiring property for your business operations, emphasises the importance of obtaining professional legal and financial counsel. Steering your way through this requires meticulous planning and strategic choices. Therefore, arm yourself with the right information and expert guidance to bolster your path to a financially secure retirement.
General Advice Warning
