Alphinity Sustainable Share (HOW0121AU) Report & Performance

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Alphinity Sustainable Share

Alphinity Sustainable Share Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The Fund lagged the market slightly in the September quarter. The clear winners were online advertising group carsales.com and industrial property developer and owner Goodman Group. Other positives were owning global medical device maker Cochlear and not owning global medical device maker Resmed Inc or supermarket Coles. The only notable detractors were mineral sands producer Iluka Resources and not owning gas producer Woodside Energy

In a year during which the macro environment continued to be challenging to navigate it’s been encouraging to see stock selection contribute solidly to overall returns. Stock picking has been the key pillar of our long-term track record and, while macro factors will of course always influence individual companies’ earnings, identifying companies which are in an earnings upgrade cycle will in our view will keep being rewarded. The Fund has maintained its greater-thanbenchmark exposure to companies seeing positive earnings revisions. Until we see a meaningful shift in broader macro factors, we expect that those companies which have recently been delivering ahead of consensus expectations will be the most likely to do so in the next 3-6 months as well.

The August reporting season aligned well with this thesis, with a solid earnings upgrade score card for the portfolio in aggregate. As always, a few company results indicated deteriorating trends and we have taken action accordingly. We exited fund manager Perpetual which, after a promising start, has been disappointing as the inflection point for costs and improved funds flow continued to be pushed further into the future. We also sold out of mineral sands producer Iluka Resources as the price outlook for its key commodities deteriorated at the same time as the company is entering a heightened capex phase.

Financial services platform HUB24 delivered one of the stronger results in August. Ongoing market share gains (funds flow) resulting in positive margin leverage provides the potential for earnings growth to continue to surprise positively, in our view.

Finally, we switched our position in Fortescue Metals into Rio Tinto. Both companies remain intrinsically linked to the iron ore price in the short term but the numerous management changes at Fortescue as well as increased uncertainty about the capital allocation framework for the company’s investment decisions in renewable energy projects has increased its company-specific risks. While its ambitions in renewables are admirable, the share price consequences of unrealistic project assumptions have been on stark display in Europe this year.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Alphinity Sustainable ShareHOW0121AUManaged FundsDomestic EquityAustralia Large GrowthDomestic Equity - Large Growth IndexASX Index 200 Index284.19 M0.95%0.00%0.4%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Alphinity Sustainable Share2.65%7.76%23%6.26%8.08%10.63%13.72%13.56%-3.92%-15.09%-52.8%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Alphinity Sustainable ShareDomestic Equity - Large Growth Index0.19%-1.46%NA%NA%NA%0.942.18%3.57%0.980.96

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Alphinity Sustainable ShareYesLevel 2, 5 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000+61 133 566https://www.challenger.com.au/personalinfo@challenger.com.au

Product Due Diligence

What is Alphinity Sustainable Share

Alphinity Sustainable Share is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against ASX Index 200 Index and sits inside the Domestic Equity - Large Growth Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Alphinity Sustainable Share has Assets Under Management of 284.19 M with a management fee of 0.95%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.4%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Alphinity Sustainable Share has returned 2.65% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 6.26% annualised and 13.56% each year since inception, which is when the Alphinity Sustainable Share first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Alphinity Sustainable Share first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 13.56%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -3.92% and -52.8% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Alphinity Sustainable Share has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Domestic Equity - Large Growth Index of 0.19% and -1.46% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Alphinity Sustainable Share has produced Alpha over the Domestic Equity - Large Growth Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Domestic Equity - Large Growth Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Alphinity Sustainable Share provide?

Alphinity Sustainable Share has a correlation coefficient of 0.96 and a beta of 0.94 when compared to the Domestic Equity - Large Growth Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Alphinity Sustainable Share and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Alphinity Sustainable Share with the ASX Index 200 Index?

For a full quantitative report on Alphinity Sustainable Share compared to the ASX Index 200 Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Alphinity Sustainable Share to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Alphinity Sustainable Share financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Alphinity Sustainable Share been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Alphinity Sustainable Share?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Alphinity Sustainable Share please contact Level 2, 5 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000 via phone +61 133 566 or via email info@challenger.com.au.

How do I get in contact with the Alphinity Sustainable Share?

If you would like to get in contact with the Alphinity Sustainable Share manager, please call +61 133 566.

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Alphinity Sustainable Share. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

The Fund outperformed nicely in August with a number of decent winners and almost no losers. The best contributors to returns were from a variety of sectors and, pleasingly, from some of our larger active weights: online advertising (carsales.com), industrial property (Goodman Group), medical devices (Cochlear), pallet pooling (Brambles Industries), health insurance (Medibank), and building materials (James Hardie). Not owning medical device company (Resmed), tech company WiseTech or supermarket operator Coles also added to returns. The only noticeable detractors were mineral sands producer Iluka Resources and financial services company Perpetual.

The portfolio’s skew towards companies with positive earnings momentum was well rewarded in August. So was also our reluctance to pay overly large premiums even for companies with positive earnings sentiment given the outsized risk from any disappointing earnings news for highly valued companies. Relative performance was also helped by the emergence of more cautious investor sentiment during the month. This came about largely due to stubborn inflation and stronger-than-expected economic growth, particularly in the US, which saw market participants hit the pause button on the goldilocks scenario of soft landing and quickly normalising inflation.

Frequent and rapid shifts in macro sentiment has been a challenge for all active managers to deal with over the last year or two, ourselves included, and while we are fully expect that this volatility will happen again at some point, it was pleasing to see bottom-up stock picking being rewarded during the August reporting season. Solid earnings announcements, and importantly generally positive outlook statements, were provided by a mix of companies that have been in the Fund for quite some time and also by some of our more recently added positions. Some of the highlights in the former category were Goodman Group, Medibank Private, carsales.com, QBE Insurance and Steadfast Group. Some of the relatively new positions that contributed positively included Brambles, James Hardie Industries, and Cochlear. We were pleased that our winners came from many different sectors, meaning it was stock selection, rather than sector allocation, that added the most value.

Commodities continues to be a sector in which positioning is tricky. Cost and capex overruns were recurring themes from Resource companies during reporting season, and economic reports out of China continued to be concerningly weak. As always this led to hopes of government stimulus, and in recent weeks, modest stimulus measures were actually announced by the Chinese authorities. While undoubtedly positive for commodity demand, this stimulus still appears to be more focused on stabilising and improving consumer confidence in the general Chinese economy, and in the hard-hit property sector specifically, than meaningfully boosting construction activity, and therefore demand for our commodities, in the way previous stimulus programs did. Although we remain underweight the Resource sector, at the same time we are staying alert to any concrete evidence of a pick-up in activity in China. Encouragingly, supply discipline from resource-producing companies remains solid at this point.

The Alphinity team is travelling far and wide in September and October. This will see us doing on the ground research in the US, Mexico, Latin America, Israel, China, Korea and Japan, covering a range of industries and sectors including Healthcare, Consumer, Technology, Building Materials, Resources and Energy. We look forward to relating some of our findings in coming reports.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

Economic data has improved recently, with GDP expectations rising, resilient labour markets, strong consumption, inflation beginning to fall, and financial markets generally responding well to tighter financial conditions. We continue to see potential risks from the lagged, cumulative impact of Fed rate hikes, but we are also aware that some normally reliable economic indicators are already at low levels and the outlook for growth appears somewhat better than many feared at the start of the year. The US manufacturing Purchasing Manager’s Index (PMI) peaked well above 60 in 2021, and after a two-year downcycle it is now at ~46; while deep in contractionary territory this is approaching levels which have historically been associated with cyclical bottoms.

From a corporate earnings perspective, and after a similar nearly two-year period of negative revisions, there also appears to be some early signs of stabilisation. The second quarter reporting season has so far been better than expected with beats, both by number and magnitude, higher than normal. Nevertheless, generally cautious forward guidance has met with mixed price responses and muted earnings revisions. For example, consensus earnings expectations for both 2023 and 2024 have barely moved over the last three months (+0.1% respectively), although flat estimates are a marked improvement from the previous negative trend of -2% to -3% per quarter. Meanwhile, underlying sector dispersion is relatively wide. Materials and Energy have seen significant negative revisions reflecting lower commodity prices, while Consumer Discretionary, Communications and Tech Hardware are amongst the sectors with positive revisions for both years. More defensive sectors like Property, Health Care and Consumer Staples continue to slip in relative earnings strength. While there are some encouraging signs, and the negative earnings cycle is relatively mature by historical standards, our stock analysis and recent research trips suggest it’s still too early to call a sustained turn in the earnings cycle

From a market perspective, leadership has rotated again this year, mostly back to growth stocks and away from defensives, although there has also been a significant rally in some cyclical industry groups recently (e.g. Autos, Semiconductors, Retail and Transport), which have responded positively to a more resilient growth outlook and rising bond yields.

Narrow market breadth has been another distinct feature, with the so-called ‘magnificent seven’ group of mega-cap stocks, which make up ~27% of the S&P 500 market capitalisation, delivering ~73% of the YTD return through to end July (albeit an improvement from 102% at the end of May 2023). Against this more challenging backdrop, we continue to focus on our bottom-up earnings analysis to manage the changing environment.

During July we continued to add to our positionsin Edwards Lifesciences, following a pullback in the stock despite a strong report, and ING, on strong earnings momentum. This was financed through taking profit in some of our best performing growth stocks (e.g. Mercadolibre, Fortinet, OnSemi & Intuitive Surgical), and also reducing other stocks where relative earnings support is falling (e.g. Chubb, Nextera Energy Partners, Otis and Keysight). Overall positioning has not changed significantly despite these changes, with the portfolio still wellpositioned in strong growth stories, combined with some flagship defensives.

We have recently added to our cyclical exposure where we have established fundamental stock conviction; however, the portfolio overall remains relatively less invested in cyclical stocks. We continue to work hard at identifying opportunities across all sectors as the earnings cycle continues to evolve.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The upcoming August reporting season should provide further insights into the extent of the economic slowdown the RBA has tried to orchestrate since the current interest rate tightening cycle started in May last year. The portfolio remains well exposed to companies that have seen better-than-average positive earnings revisions over the last several months. While there is always a risk, especially late in the cycle, that investors look beyond the current earnings environment and focus on a potential future earnings recovery, in our view it is unlikely that we have arrived at that point yet. A more decisive change in monetary policy, a pivot to a more expansive fiscal policy or a more significant fall in earnings that resulted in a “this is as bad as it gets” argument would typically precede such a change in investor sentiment.

For now, however, strong current operational performance should continue to be well rewarded. We see this as being achieved by a mix of portfolio holdings that also reported well in February – companies like Brambles, QBE, Steadfast, Medibank, Orora and Woolworths – as well as some newer positions in companies that have managed through a challenging industry environment and have come through at the other end in a good position to benefit as headwinds ease.

Last month we wrote about building materials manufacturer James Hardie being one of those companies. Despite going through a potentially destabilising management change last year, and even though US mortgage rates have ticked up again, the company appears to have stabilised and be back to delivering above-market volume growth.

The Fund performed in line with the market in June, and lagged slightly across the June quarter. The best contributors were pallet hirer Brambles, global insurer QBE, advertising platform carsales.com and domestic insurer Suncorp; not owning resource giants South32 or Rio Tinto also helped. Offsetting these however were holdings of resource giant BHP and medical device maker Fisher & Paykel Health; not owning high tech companies Xero and WiseTech also detracted from returns.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

The Fund lagged the market a little in May, with a holding in respiratory products maker Fisher & Paykel and Lifestyle Communities both detracting from returns. The portfolio benefitted from no exposure to gold miner Newcrest, while overweight holdings in Suncorp and Lynas Rare Earths also contributed to returns.

In a market with limited overall earnings growth and earnings revisions that, despite some stabilisation more recently, appears to have more risk to the downside than upside, companies which can deliver growth, and especially growth ahead of market expectations, should be well rewarded. The Fund remains well exposed to these types of companies overall and we look forward to confirmation of this as we approach the August reporting season.

During May we further reduced our Bank exposure as increased mortgage competition and higher funding costs will be a challenging combination for the Banks’ net interest margins, especially in a low credit growth environment. We remain less concerned about large credit losses for the banking sector as a whole given large unused provisions that were raised during the Covid period. A moderate underweight to the sector is appropriate, in our view. We have also reduced our exposure to the Resources sector in face of weaker economic data out of China. We remain firmly underweight that sector in aggregate with a maintained preference for iron ore exposure, albeit at lower levels.

We have however built positions in James Hardie and Cochlear during the past months. We previously had concerns with Hardie’s ability to manage margins and continue taking market share in a soft US house siding market that is increasingly competitive. While the overall market environment remains challenging, housing starts have stabilised at lower levels in recent months. More importantly however, James Hardie has managed the weak environment well from a cost and sales perspective resulting in a better than expected margin outlook and likely further earnings upgrades.

Cochlear is benefitting from the dual tailwinds of a post-covid recovery in implant surgeries and the successful launch of its latest generation sound processor, the Nucleus 8. Processor upgrades are typically released every five years and the latest version, which is smaller and has better connectivity than its predecessor, should enable Cochlear to not only gain share of new patients but, importantly, also trigger strong demand from N6 and N7 users that will now be eligible for an upgrade, funded by their health insurers.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

The Fund performed essentially in line with the market in April, and there were few companies of note on either side of the ledger. The most meaningful positive contributors were health insurer Medibank Private, housing provider Lifestyle Communities, pallet company Brambles and auto advertiser carsales.com; the only meaningful detractor was owning resource giant BHP.

Despite ongoing macro uncertainty, the portfolio has continued to exhibit better earnings revisions than its benchmark with March quarter updates from Brambles, Medibank Private and Woolworths some of the highlights. Indications of stronger-than-anticipated increases in mobile pricing plans across the telecom sector has also benefitted Telstra.

The mixed news out of China, especially the suggestion that there might be a Government-mandated cap on steel production, has seen weakness across the commodity price complex. The portfolio remains underweight this sector and we trimmed our iron ore exposure somewhat as near term earnings upside has become more limited.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been an issue bubbling away for some time but it has been brought to prominence this year by the release of ChatGPT. There are few companies for which AI will not become relevant over the next few years. It has the potential to provide great productivity improvement, but there might also be negative outcomes for society. To that end, Alphinity has teamed up with Australia’s premier scientific research organisation, CSIRO, to conduct a study into how it can be used responsibly. We will talk more about this in coming months.

We trimmed the Fund’s exposure to the Bank sector earlier in the year to close to a neutral position as mortgage pricing competition intensified. This trend appears to have continued and we trimmed our exposure further, even though strong balance sheets and attractive dividend yields should cushion the fallout from a faster than expected normalisation of net interest margins.

We remain confident in our ability to identify companies with stronger earnings prospects than forecast by market participants. We believe this will ultimately be rewarded by investors, notwithstanding continued volatility in market sentiment.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The Fund performed in line with the market over the March Quarter. The material contributors were a diverse mix of health insurer Medibank Private, packaging company Orora and pallet pool provider Brambles, retailer Super Retail Group and insurer QBE, although these were partially offset by our positions in Lifestyle Communities and National Australia Bank. Not owning Aristocrat Leisure or gold miner Newcrest, both precluded by the Fund’s Charter, also cost some performance.

Following a brief period of individual company earnings focus, macro factors are again dominating the headlines. And following an even briefer period of market nervousness investors appear to have decided, for now at least, that the main upshot from the US regional banking calamity is further arguments for the US Federal Reserve and other central banks to end the current rate hiking cycle. The rationale behind this view is that reduced credit availability will now do some of the work higher interest rates would otherwise have had to do. Our own central ban ’s decision to not raise interest rates further in April is likely to have been at least partly influenced by this thinking.

As rising interest rates have been the main headwind for global equity markets a peak in interest rates is, everything else being equal, clearly positive. However, things are seldom equal. As we have argued for some months now the focus for equity investors should move from whether rates have peaked, or are close to peaking, to how long they will stay around current levels and how significant the impact on the economy, and in consequence, corporate earnings, will be from the sharp hikes we have already had.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

The Fund outperformed the market nicely in February, helped by strong returns from some of our key positions. The best contributors to overall performance came from health insurer Medibank Private, sustainable packaging company Orora, global general insurer QBE, and insurance broker Steadfast, pallet company Brambles Industries, and not owning Rio Tinto or gold-producer Northern Star. The only detractors of note were our positions in Lifestyle Communities and BHP.

The February reporting season was a welcome break from the many macro factors that had been dominating individual share price performances. The Fund had a good month with most portfolio holdings which reported delivering strong results, positive outlook statements and, as a consequence, strong share price performance. Some of the highlights were pallets pool company Brambles, global insurer QBE, retailer Super Retail Group, packaging/distribution company Orora, logistics specialist Qube, airline Qantas and asset manager Macquarie Group, in addition to The Lottery Corporation, Medibank Private and Woolworths. While the earnings drivers naturally varied amongst this very diverse group of companies, common features were strong operational performance, the ability to manage cost pressure from higher input costs through a combination of operational efficiency and pricing power. We added to our positions in both Woolworths and Medibank Private after their 1H results with increased confidence in their renewed operational momentum with diminishing challenges from Covid disruptions and November’s cyberattack respectively.

In the banking sector, only CBA reported first half earnings while the others released 1st quarter updates. CBA delivered a strong set of numbers but also indicated that increased competition and a gradual rise in funding costs will start to impact margins in the second half. We continue to like the banks for their positive margin leverage from higher interest rates and strong balance sheets. However, we have trimmed the sector to a more neutral sector weight while monitoring for further evidence of their earnings resilience.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee