WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) (SWI1413AU) Report & Performance

What is the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) fund?

WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) aims to achieve a long term total return that exceeds the MSCI All-Country World Index ex-Australia (with gross dividends reinvested reported in Australian dollars and unhedged) (Benchmark) before fees, taxes and expenses over rolling three-year time periods, but with lower volatility than the Benchmark. The Fund will invest in a high conviction, actively managed diversified portfolio of listed, quality, high growth companies sourced from developed (ex-Australia) and emerging markets, with the primary objective of providing long-term capital growth.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)

WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of -3.72% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of -3.69%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over five years and since inception.

Following strong gains in the first half of the year, global equity markets posted a negative return for both the month and September quarter. A sell-off in global bonds (the 10-year US Treasury yield reached its highest level since 2007) was one of the primary factors contributing to the weakness in equity markets. The increase in bond yields put downward pressure on equity market valuations while the inversion of the curve renewed fears of a significant economic slowdown and subsequent impact on corporate earnings. The weakness in equity markets over the month was widespread with Japan and the UK the only major markets finishing in positive territory. It was a similar story of broad-based weakness at the sector level, the notable exception being Energy stocks which gained following production cuts from Saudi Arabia and Russia. Factor performance reflected the risk off sentiment with low volatility, quality and value stocks outperforming growth. The Australian dollar traded in a narrow range in September leading to little difference between the returns of hedged and unhedged portfolios.

Stock selection made a positive contribution to portfolio relative performance in September. This was most evident in the Health Care, Industrials and Consumer Staples sectors of the portfolio. On the flipside, selection in the Consumer Discretionary and Financials sectors detracted from relative performance. From a sector allocation perspective, the largest positive contributors were the overweight exposure to Health Care and below benchmark allocations to Real Estate and Consumer Staples. The zero positions in both Energy and Communication Services and overweight position in Technology weighed on performance relative to the benchmark.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)SWI1413AUManaged FundsForeign EquityLarge GrowthForeign Equity - Large Growth IndexDeveloped -World Index0.00 M1.25%00.6%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)-0.31%1.95%30.14%6.07%12.49%11.19%14.5%13.1%-3.24%-27.81%-27.81%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)Foreign Equity - Large Growth Index6.18%0.35%NA%NA%NA%1.093.78%5.43%0.950.91

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)Yes-https://contango.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)

WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Large Growth Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) has Assets Under Management of 0.00 M with a management fee of 1.25%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.6%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) has returned -0.31% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 6.07% annualised and 13.1% each year since inception, which is when the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 13.1%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -3.24% and -27.81% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Growth Index of 6.18% and 0.35% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Large Growth Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Large Growth Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) provide?

WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) has a correlation coefficient of 0.91 and a beta of 1.09 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Growth Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) with the Developed -World Index?

For a full quantitative report on WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed)?

If you would like to get in contact with the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed) manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the WCM Quality Global Growth (Managed). All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of 0.16% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of 1.11%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over five years and since inception.

Global equities declined in August in local currency terms, amid renewed fears concerning the Chinese property market and disappointment that the expected post COVID lockdown economic rebound in China has failed to materialise. An increase in global sovereign bond yields, following a Fitch ratings downgrade of US treasuries, also weighed on markets. At a regional level, the decline in Chinese equities was a major contributor to the underperformance of emerging markets relative to developed markets. In terms of sectors, Energy was the standout being the only one to record a positive return, and at a factor level, value was favoured over growth. The weaker Australian dollar in August enhanced the returns of unhedged portfolios, offsetting the decline in equity markets.

The portfolio underperformance in August was largely attributable to stock selection in the Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials sectors.

From a sector allocation perspective, the overweight position in Health Care was the largest positive contributor to relative performance followed by the underweight exposure to both Utilities and Consumer Staples. In contrast, the zero weighting to Energy and Communication services and above index exposure to Industrials detracted from performance versus the Benchmark.

The calendar year has been a relatively quiet one thus far in terms of portfolio trading activity. One of the new names added to the portfolio was Arista Networks (Arista), a California based network equipment company founded by a trio of ex-Cisco executives. Arista disrupted its market during the platform shift to cloud, offering a networking product that was ideally suited for the needs of the emerging hyperscalers i.e., large cloud service providers. The firm is deeply embedded and aligned with the customers that are driving the lion’s share of industry growth and artificial intelligence will accelerate this trend. The WCM investment team believes Arista’s ‘scrappy’ engineering driven culture and highly technical salesforce are huge assets that will allow it to continue outperforming its peers.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of 1.08% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of 2.82%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over five years and since inception.

Global equity markets posted their third straight positive month in July. The combination of better-than-expected inflation and economic growth numbers in the US brought optimism that the US Federal Reserve may be on track to engineer a ‘soft landing’.

While Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell did not give any firm guidance on whether July’s rate rise would be the last of this tightening cycle, he did indicate that a recession in 2023 was now less likely. Economic news in the rest of world was in general supportive of markets too. UK June inflation was lower than expected and the European Central Bank hinted that interest rate rises may be close to pausing. While economic growth in China slowed in the June quarter, policy easing plus expectations of further stimulus to come were additional positive signs for investors. July’s global equity market gains were broad based with all the major country indices posting positive returns. Investors’ increased risk appetite was reflected in the outperformance of emerging markets relative to developed markets and smaller capitalisation stocks versus large. Basic Resources, Banks and Energy were among the best performing sectors with Health Care and Utilities lagging. There was minimal dispersion at a factor level.

Security selection was the primary contributor to the portfolio’s underperformance in the month. The strong relative returns from Technology, Consumer Staples and Industrials holdings were more than offset by stocks in the Health Care, Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors of the portfolio. From a sector allocation perspective, the underweight exposure to Consumer Staples, zero position in Utilities and above benchmark weight in Consumer Discretionary added to relative performance. On the other hand, the above benchmark weight in Health Care and zero position in both Communication Services and Energy detracted from performance. The strong returns from global equity markets year-to-date have been achieved against a backdrop of many market commentators warning of the need for caution in the face of an expected economic downturn. As markets have risen these same commentators are now highlighting ‘stretched valuations’ as another reason for caution. For the Quality Global Growth strategy (the Strategy), it is encouraging that its year-to-date returns have been primarily driven by earnings growth as opposed to price-to-earnings multiple expansion. A market environment like this (i.e., one which is rewarding company fundamentals) typically bodes well for the Strategy. Regardless of the market outlook, the investment team at WCM Investment Management remains confident its focus on positive moat trajectory businesses with well-aligned adaptable cultures will deliver positive long-term outcomes for investors.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of 2.99% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of 2.63%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over one month and one year. The strong finish to the financial year brings the total return for the portfolio in FY2023 to 22.65%, outperforming the Benchmark of 21.51%.

Global equity markets rallied in June completing a strong first half rebound from the steep falls of 2022. The economic news in June was consistent with that of most of the year to date, namely, that growth continues to slow, but the global recession many had forecast has yet to materialise. Headline inflation has declined but absolute levels are still higher than those targeted by central banks. The better-than-expected growth outcomes have supported equities, while the disappointing core inflation numbers have prevented similar strong returns from bonds. The strong performance of equity markets in June was broad based with all sectors posting positive returns. At a regional level the US was the best of the major markets. Poor June economic data in the UK and China contributed to their equity markets being the laggards of the major markets for the month. Value as a factor had a positive month but growth was more mixed, stronger in developed markets but weaker in emerging markets. The Australian dollar was stronger in June, reducing the returns for unhedged portfolios.

Positive stock selection in the Financials, Materials and Industrials sleeves of the portfolio were more than offset by underperformance in the Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care sectors. From a sector allocation perspective, Communication Services (zero weight) was the largest positive contributor to relative performance, followed by Industrials (overweight) and Consumer Staples (underweight). On the other hand, Health Care (overweight) detracted from relative performance, as did Information Technology (overweight) and zero allocation to Energy.

The marked reversal in market sentiment year to date once again highlighted the importance of consistency of process and long-term perspective. The worst performing asset classes of 2022, including growth equities, have led the way in 2023. Equally the best performing assets of 2022 such as commodities have been amongst the worst this year. The Quality Global Growth Strategy has benefited from the team at WCM Investment Management remaining committed to the investment process which has delivered consistent long-term outperformance of market benchmarks. This process is based on identifying companies with corporate cultures that help drive the expansion of their competitive advantages.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of 1.54% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of 1.40%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over one month and one year.

Global equity markets declined marginally (in local currency terms) in May conceding some of the solid gains made year to date. The dominant headline making news for financial markets for most of the month was the US debt ceiling impasse between the Republicans and the Democrats. However, by month end, a compromise was reached which required Congress approval. Economic data in the US and Europe remained mixed with the manufacturing (weak) and services (strong) sector surveys giving conflicting signals in terms of the outlook for growth. The pace of China’s post lockdown recovery showed signs of slowing while in contrast, Japan posted a positive quarter 1, with GDP growth driven by strong domestic demand. Monetary tightening from central banks continued with the US Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank each raising interest rates by 0.25%. At a regional level, developed market equities outperformed emerging markets. However, the main divergence within markets was at the sector level. Technology stocks, in particular those considered beneficiaries of the surge in artificial intelligence (AI), made strong gains while Energy and Materials were among the weaker performers.

Factor performance during the month reflected this strength in Technology stocks with growth outperforming value. The Australian dollar was weaker in May, enhancing the returns of unhedged global portfolios.

The portfolio’s outperformance during May was largely attributed to stock selection. The sectors most contributing to this were Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Staples. On the flipside, security selection in the Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Materials sectors detracted from relative performance. In terms of sector allocations, the largest positive contributors included the zero exposure to both Energy and Utilities. The overweight exposure to Health Care and below benchmark position in Information Technology and Communication Services were the primary detractors.

The hype around AI has many investors scrambling over how best to gain exposure to it. Having conducted a detailed research project on AI, the investment team at WCM concluded that adopting a ‘picks and shovel’ approach is the best way to invest in this theme. This approach involves investing in companies that will be providing key inputs into AI as opposed to making binary bets on individual winners. Examples of holdings in the portfolio that stand to benefit from the growth in AI include Microsoft, Entegris, Snowflake and Lam Research.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of 2.14% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of 2.77%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over three months.

Global equity markets made a positive start to the second quarter of 2023. Although reported economic data was mixed, on balance it surprised on the upside. The pace and scale of central bank tightening had spiked fears of a deep global recession but to date, economic activity has remained relatively resilient. This coupled with the continued downtrend in headline inflation has been supportive of risk assets, including equities. While markets are still discounting another 0.25% increase in interest rates in May by the US Federal Reserve (the Fed), the expectation is the Fed will then pause and be cutting rates towards the end of the year. Chinese economic data released during the month was also positive, with first quarter GDP growth of 4.5%, ahead of market expectations. However, continued geopolitical tensions dragged the Chinese equity market lower, in turn, contributing to the underperformance of emerging market equities relative to developed markets.

At a sector level, Energy and Consumer Staples were among the better performers with Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary lagging. In terms of factors, the trends continued from March with large capitalisation stocks and value outperforming small capitalisation stocks and growth respectively.

The Australian dollar was weaker in April, adding to the returns of unhedged portfolios. The portfolio’s small underperformance in April was primarily due to stock selection. While stock selection was positive in the Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Materials sectors, it was outweighed by the underperformance of the Information Technology, Financials and Health Care holdings.

Portfolio activity has been relatively quiet year-to-date with Cambridge, England based pharmaceutical company, AstraZeneca the only new position added. AstraZeneca meets the criteria the investment team at WCM Investment Management seeks in all portfolio holdings, i.e., a positive moat trajectory supported by a strong, well aligned corporate culture. AstraZeneca’s current leadership has led a dramatic cultural shift which has included reorienting the company to be more focused on earlystage science, thereby improving its success rate in drug development. That effort has helped turn what was once an unproductive research and development organisation into one of the most prolific in the industry. AstraZeneca is now positioned to reap the attendant benefits of this transformation with multiple mega blockbusters, particularly in oncology.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of 4.36% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of 4.05%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over one and three months.

Global equity markets moved higher in March despite the month being marred by both a major bank failure and state-backed banking merger. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, closely followed by the merger of Credit Suisse and UBS caused temporary short-term panic in markets. However, by month end, this fear was replaced by optimism that these events may act as a catalyst for central banks potentially to halt the pace and scale of future interest rate increases. US inflation data again pointed to a declining trend with the consumer price index gaining 6.0% in February, compared with the peak level of 9.1% in June 2022. The absolute level, however, remains considerably above the US Federal Reserve’s target rate of 2.0%. Inflation numbers in Europe also showed a declining trend, although this positive news was partially tempered by concerns over potential contagion effects from the Credit Suisse crisis and the impact of civil disturbance from strikes in France and the UK. At a sector level, Information Technology and Communication Services led markets higher during the month. The US market’s relatively high allocation to these sectors contributed to it being amongst the best performers at an individual country level. The Financial sector, for the reasons described earlier, and Energy were two of the larger sectors posting declines for the month. Factor performance was mixed, with one noticeable feature being the outperformance of large versus small capitalisation stocks. The Australian dollar declined marginally in March, enhancing returns for unhedged portfolios.

Stock selection was the primary driver of portfolio outperformance during the month. This was most evident in the Financials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary sleeves of the portfolio. Sectors where stock selection detracted from relative performance included Information Technology and Materials. From a sector selection perspective, the zero exposure to Energy and Real Estate and overweight exposure to Health Care were the largest positive contributors. On the flipside, the above benchmark positions in Financials and Industrials and the absence of any exposure to Communication stocks detracted from relative returns.

The March quarter was a positive one for the Quality Global Growth Strategy in terms of both absolute and relative returns, delivering a strong return of 10.92% compared with the Benchmark return of 8.79%. Lower trending inflation and the decline in long-term interest rates provided a positive tailwind for growth-style investing. As evidence of investing often being as much about what you don’t own as you what you do, the Strategy also benefited from the zero exposure to Energy stocks, the worst performing sector over the quarter. This contrasts to the experience of 2022 when Energy topped the sector performance tables. There was one new position added to the portfolio during the quarter, UK pharmaceutical group Astra Zeneca.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

The portfolio delivered a return of 3.04% during the month, compared with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-Australia) (the Benchmark) return of 1.53%. The portfolio has delivered returns in excess of the Benchmark over one and three months.

While global equity markets actually retreated over the month, the Australian dollar was significantly weaker against the US Dollar in February, which resulted in enhanced returns for unhedged global equity portfolios. In general, signs of more resilient economic growth promoted a shift in market sentiment regarding the likely peak and then reversal of global interest rates. These signs included stronger than expected US labour market data, European business surveys showing heightened confidence and evidence of a sharp post COVID-19 lockdown rebound in China. The US Federal Reserve, Bank of England and European Central Bank all increased interest rates in February. The commentary from each suggested that while inflation has declined from the peak, central banks believe their job is not done yet. In terms of individual markets, Europe fared best with each of the major continental bourses posting flat-to-positive returns. Emerging markets were the major laggard with narrow performance dispersion at a sector level. Information Technology and Industrials were among the better performing sectors. Quality and growth factors marginally outperformed value.

The portfolio’s outperformance in February can be largely attributed to stock selection. This was particularly evident in the strategy’s holdings in the Consumer Discretionary, Materials and Financial sectors. Security selection in the Information Technology sector was the largest drag on relative performance. From a sector allocation perspective, the zero exposure to Communication Services was the largest positive contributor followed by the overweight positions in Information Technology and Industrials. On the flipside, the above benchmark allocations to Health Care and Consumer Discretionary and underweight position in Consumer Staples detracted from performance.

February was another month in which the market seemed to flip from the hope of a potential ‘pivot’ in the direction of global interest rates to one of fear over ‘higher for longer’. With central banks showing a preference to err on the side of potentially over-tightening monetary policy to ensure inflation is beaten, rather than move too slowly and risk it becoming entrenched, an economic slowdown and/ or a recession seems likely. This would inevitably put pressure on global corporate earnings. The WCM Quality Global strategy is not constructed based on any macroeconomic forecasts or expectations. However, its exposure to a diversified range of expanding moat companies with aligned corporate cultures should prove relatively robust in a market where investors are putting a premium on earnings certainty.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee