UBS Property Securities Fund is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index and sits inside the Property - Australian Listed Property Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The UBS Property Securities Fund has Assets Under Management of 250.64 M with a management fee of 0.85%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.25%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the UBS Property Securities Fund has returned 6.26% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 8.35% annualised and 17.95% each year since inception, which is when the UBS Property Securities Fund first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since UBS Property Securities Fund first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 17.95%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -7.98% and -77.09% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The UBS Property Securities Fund has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Property - Australian Listed Property Index of 2.33% and -0.13% since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. UBS Property Securities Fund has produced Alpha over the Property - Australian Listed Property Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Property - Australian Listed Property Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
UBS Property Securities Fund has a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and a beta of 1.05 when compared to the Property - Australian Listed Property Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on UBS Property Securities Fund and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on UBS Property Securities Fund compared to the ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index, you can click here.
To sort and compare the UBS Property Securities Fund financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the UBS Property Securities Fund. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
The Fund returned +4.00% during August, outperforming the S&P/ASX 300 AREIT Index by 1.82%.
The top monthly contributor to performance was the Fund’s overweight position in Goodman Group. The industrial fund manager outperformed following the release of its FY23 earnings result, in which they announced a significant data centre development opportunity. We continue to be attracted to Goodman Group for its sustainable earnings growth, underpinned by strong underlying fundamentals in the industrial sector and a sizeable development pipeline.
The Fund’s underweight position in Charter Hall Long WALE REIT also contributed to monthly performance, which underperformed after forward earnings guidance fell short of market expectations. The Fund maintains an underweight position in the REIT due to its stretched balance sheet position, tight capitalisation rates, and continued headwinds from rising cost of debt.
The largest detractor from monthly performance was the Fund’s overweight position in Abacus Property Group. Abacus underperformed post the de‐staple of its self‐ storage assets into a separate REIT. We believe the Group’s core commercial portfolio is trading significantly below intrinsic value with a recapitalised balance sheet.
The Fund returned +4.06% during July, outperforming the S&P/ASX 300 AREIT Index by 0.17%.
The top monthly contributor to performance was the Fund’s overweight position in Rural Funds Group. The Group is currently pursuing a major macadamia development program, as well as deploying capital across cattle and cropping productivity upgrades. We continue to be attracted to the uncorrelated cash flows with strong and appreciating asset backing.
The Fund’s overweight position in Lifestyle Communities also contributed to monthly performance. Lifestyle Communities is significantly scaling its production rate with the launch of seven new projects, underpinned by strong demographic tailwinds. The manufactured housing estate developer outperformed following the RBA’s decision to pause its rate hiking cycle.
The main detractor from monthly performance was the Fund’s overweight position in Abacus Property Group. The self‐storage sector exhibited softening fundamentals, with lower occupancy levels due to a weaker consumer environment. Abacus is in the process of demerging its commercial and storage portfolios to unlock securityholder value and enhance the strategic outlook of the standalone storage business.
The Fund returned +0.69% during June, outperforming the S&P/ASX 300 AREIT Index by 0.78%.
The top monthly contributor to performance was the Fund’s overweight position in HMC Capital Limited. The fund manager announced a $400m equity commitment within its Last Mile Logistics Fund, marking the Group’s first significant institutional equity contribution. The Group also announced its Unlisted Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund is on track for its first close in September.
The Fund’s underweight position in Region Group also contributed to monthly performance. The convenience and discretionary retail asset owner underperformed in response to falling consumer confidence in a rising interest rate environment.
The main detractor from monthly performance was the Fund’s overweight position in National Storage REIT. The storage asset owner underperformed after providing a market update that disclosed a fall in occupancy, impacted by a weaker consumer environment. The Fund’s overweight position in Ingenia Communities Group also detracted from monthly performance after flagging increased buyer caution is impacting residential activity levels and sales rates.
The Fund returned -2.28% during May, underperforming the S&P/ASX 300 AREIT Accumulation Index return of -1.81%.
The Fund’s overweight position in HMC Capital Limited was the strongest contributor to monthly performance. The fund manager outperformed following the acquisition of a $1.2bn Healthscope hospital portfolio and the concurrent launch of its unlisted healthcare strategy. The deal increases the Group’s total assets under management to $7.5bn and demonstrates an ability to execute large complex transactions in challenging capital market conditions.
The Fund’s overweight position in Goodman Group also contributed to performance after the Group raised earnings guidance during the month. Goodman Group remains a key overweight holding with exposure to world class industrial assets and significant balance sheet capacity to execute on its sizeable development pipeline.
Detractors to performance included the Fund’s overweight position in Lifestyle Communities. The manufactured housing estate developer underperformed after lowering its FY23 home settlement forecasts. The Group’s medium term settlement targets were retained, suggesting the timing issue is not reflective of production constraints or lower buyer demand. Lifestyle is significantly scaling its production rate with the launch of seven new projects, underpinned by strong demographic tailwinds.
The Fund’s overweight position in Rural Funds Group also detracted from performance. The Group is currently deploying capital across cattle and cropping productivity upgrades, whilst also pursuing a major macadamia development program. The market remains cautious towards capital expenditure intensive business models; however, we are comfortable that the Group has sufficient liquidity to execute its growth strategy. We continue to be attracted to the uncorrelated cash flows with strong and appreciating asset backing.
The Fund returned 5.36% during April, outperforming the S&P/ASX 300 AREIT Accumulation Index return of 5.16%. The main contributors to relative performance were the Fund’s overweight residential exposures, which posted strong monthly returns as national house prices stabilised following the first RBA pause after ten consecutive interest rate hikes.
The Fund’s overweight position in Mirvac was the strongest contributor to monthly performance, which reported its Q3 update and rebased FY23 earnings by deferring a portion of residential settlements and capital profit recognition into the following financial year. Mirvac also announced progress across several strategic initiatives; introducing capital partners across its entire build-to-rent pipeline and key commercial developments, whilst also entering due diligence across two major office assets to complete its $1.3bn divestment program. The Fund’s overweight position in Stockland also contributed to performance, which similarly reported its Q3 update and demonstrated positive momentum across all business divisions. Its residential segment reported a large rebound in buyer enquiry levels, back to pre-pandemic levels, whilst its commercial trust reported strong industrial leasing and retail sales outcomes.
Detractors to performance included the Fund’s overweight position in Rural Funds Group, which is currently ramping up its capital expenditure across cattle and cropping productivity upgrades, whilst also pursuing a major macadamia development program. The market continues to take a cautious view towards capital-hungry business models. However, we are comfortable that the Group has sufficient liquidity to execute its growth strategy, and we remain attracted to the uncorrelated cash flows with strong and appreciating asset backing. The Fund’s overweight position in Goodman Group also detracted from performance, which lagged the Index with minimal news flow. We expect the Group to report a strong trading update in May, benefiting from strong industrial market tailwinds across its global platform.
The Fund declined by ‐6.59% during March, outperforming the S&P/ASX 300 AREIT Index by 0.25%.
During the month, the top contributor to performance was the Fund’s underweight position in GPT Group, which retracted ‐10% as the market assessed tightening credit conditions and the impact to office valuations. These similar concerns weighed on the performance of listed fund managers, whereby interest rate volatility continued to suppress transactional activity. To this extent, the Fund’s underweight positions in both HMC Capital and Centuria Capital Group contributed to monthly relative performance. In what was a challenging month for absolute returns, the Fund’s overweight position in Peet Limited positively contributed on the back of improving residential momentum and a moderation in the cash rate outlook.
The month’s outperformers were typically real estate securities with low leverage, against a backdrop of mounting credit concerns. As such, the Fund’s underweight positions in BWP Trust and Waypoint REIT were the biggest detractors to relative performance, given their defensive portfolios and capital structures.
The Fund returned -0.74% during February, marginally underperforming the S&P/ASX 300 AREIT Accumulation Index return of -0.36%.
The main contributors to relative performance included the Fund’s overweight position in National Storage REIT, which upgraded earnings guidance on the back of resilient customer demand and robust rate growth across its portfolio. The Fund also benefited from an overweight position in Arena REIT, which similarly outperformed market expectations and demonstrated resilient childcare fundamentals with strong inflation-capture in its rental contracts and improving development returns.
Detractors to performance included the Fund’s overweight position in Rural Funds Group, which is currently ramping up its development program and faced minor earnings impacts from commodity price volatility in its operating assets and adverse weather. The Fund’s overweight position in Ingenia Communities Group also detracted from performance, which downgraded its residential settlement guidance, citing delays due to labour constraints and weather impacting construction timeframes. Looking beyond the current reporting period, we believe Ingenia will continue to benefit from the structural drivers underpinning the lifestyle communities sector, such as an aging population supported by government rent assistance.
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details