Premium Asia Income is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Global High Yield Credit Hdg Index and sits inside the Fixed Income - High Yield Credit Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Premium Asia Income has Assets Under Management of 50.87 M with a management fee of 0.98%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 1%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Premium Asia Income has returned 1.53% in the last month. The previous three years have returned -3.31% annualised and 8.06% each year since inception, which is when the Premium Asia Income first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Premium Asia Income first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 8.06%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -1.24% and -33.43% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Premium Asia Income has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Fixed Income - High Yield Credit Index of 3.8% and -0.54% since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Premium Asia Income has produced Alpha over the Fixed Income - High Yield Credit Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Fixed Income - High Yield Credit Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
Premium Asia Income has a correlation coefficient of 0.56 and a beta of 0.92 when compared to the Fixed Income - High Yield Credit Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on Premium Asia Income and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on Premium Asia Income compared to the Global High Yield Credit Hdg Index, you can click here.
To sort and compare the Premium Asia Income financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Premium Asia Income. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
The Asian credit market was marginally soft for most of August, with high yield issues lagging the broader market. However, a strong rally followed, which narrowed the losses, towards the end of the month after easing measures were announced by the Chinese government in the last week of the month. During the month, we reduced our China property and convertible bond positions and reinvested some beaten-down names that offer good value. We were also active in the investment grade new issue market.
The Asian credit market remained stable in July. High yield credit spreads widened, delivering negative total returns, while investment grade bonds were roughly flat. After the rate hike pause in the June meeting, the FOMC resumed a +25bps rate hike in July while leaving the door open for future rates increase, depending on future data. During the month, we switched some of the portfolio’s short-dated issues into longer-dated ones, which should support the fund as rates peak.
The Asian credit market was stable in June, with high yield issues outperforming investment grades. During the month, the Fed temporarily paused its rate hike but hinted a few more could be coming for the rest of the year to control inflation. The US Treasury market was little changed.
We added some long-dated investment grade bonds as valuations have become attractive.
In May, the disappointing economic data from China impacted risk sentiments in both the equities and credit markets. The HSI shed more than 8% during the month, while the credit markets fared better, with the JACI composite finishing the month down by about 0.8%. Meanwhile, JACI High Yield Index gave up roughly 3%. We took advantage of the higher US Treasury yield and added some long-dated investment grade issues with attractive valuations. Other than that, there was little change in our portfolio positions.
After a strong year-to-date rally, the Asian credit markets took a breather in April with mixed performance. Investment grade bonds outperformed, while high yield performance was flat to slightly negative. There was some profit-taking in the China property high yield space, while the rest of the market was relatively quiet for the month.
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the hastily arranged acquisition of Credit Suisse by rival UBS sent risk appetite sharply lower in March. The benchmark 10-year US treasury rallied strongly, but the banks’ additional tier-1 capital (AT1) space suffered. The Asian credit markets performed relatively better, posting positive monthly gains. China credits gave up some YTD gains due to profit-taking. We turned slightly defensive and raised our cash level. Managing the quality and liquidity of our portfolio remains one of our priorities.
The Asian credit markets took a breather in February, as rising US Treasury yields once again triggered inflation concerns and the upcoming Fed’s rate decision. The lack of further positive catalysts in the market also brought out some profit-taking activities. The universe of both investment grade and high yield credits was down by more than 1% for the month. We took profits on some positions with high dollar prices and reinvested into others with lower prices. We also continue to focus on managing the quality and liquidity of our portfolio.
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details