Platinum Unhedged Fund (PLA0006AU) Report & Performance

What is the Platinum Unhedged Fund fund?

Platinum Unhedged Fund aims to provide capital growth over the long-term by investing in undervalued companies around the world. The Fund primarily invests in listed securities. The Portfolio will ideally consist of 40 to 80 securities that Platinum believes to be undervalued by the market. The Fund may use Derivatives to achieve long equity exposure. The Portfolio will typically have around 75% or more net equity exposure. There is no short selling of indices or stocks and no hedging of currency exposure. The geographic disposition of the assets will determine the Fund’s currency exposure. The Portfolio is generally constructed using the best high conviction ideas drawn from all The Platinum Trust Funds, with a few exceptions. On account of the relatively concentrated nature of the Portfolio, holdings that carry great conviction will generally be larger than in the Platinum’s “risk managed” products (i.e. the other Funds).

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Platinum Unhedged Fund

Platinum Unhedged Fund Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The Fund’s value was down less than one percent over the quarter. Over the calendar year-to-date the Fund has returned nearly 11%.

The strongest contributors were our energy holdings. Oil field services companies Schlumberger and Valaris were up nearly 20% over the quarter. Nuclear/uranium stocks such as Cameco also did well (up 29%). Both these energy sectors are emerging from deep recessions. Indeed, it is arguable that the nuclear industry in the West is only just emerging from a 40-year hibernation. Now however, both sectors are enjoying a resurgence of demand.

We also saw decent returns from our holdings in China e-commerce player PDD as that stock rose over 40% on market over the quarter. Pulp producers UPM (+19%) and Suzano (22%) also did well.

Offsetting these gains we saw a fall in a number of our travel holdings (Wizz Air -31%, Interglobe down 9% and Airbus -4%) due to the higher oil price and the recall of the Pratt and Whitney geared turbofan engine. This recall will ground a total of 1500 planes over the next three years.

We also saw a retracement in the share price of a number of our semiconductor holdings over the quarter – (Infineon -17%, Microchip -12%, TSMC -9%). Electric vehicle battery manufacturer LG Chem fell 25% due to concerns around slowing momentum in global electric vehicle sales.

After a strong run in markets, we trimmed a number of our holdings and fully exited our positions in Erste Bank, Intesa and Shell.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Platinum Unhedged FundPLA0006AUManaged FundsForeign EquityLarge Blend - SpecialisedForeign Equity - Large Specialised IndexDeveloped -World Index213.26 M1.35%00.31%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Platinum Unhedged Fund3%0.33%7.49%3.11%9.63%9.57%11.5%12.4%-4.87%-17.27%-25.25%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Platinum Unhedged FundForeign Equity - Large Specialised Index-12.32%0.69%NA%NA%NA%0.737.62%6.71%0.70.84

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Platinum Unhedged FundYes-https://www.platinum.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Platinum Unhedged Fund

Platinum Unhedged Fund is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Large Specialised Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Platinum Unhedged Fund has Assets Under Management of 213.26 M with a management fee of 1.35%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.31%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Platinum Unhedged Fund has returned 3% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 3.11% annualised and 12.4% each year since inception, which is when the Platinum Unhedged Fund first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Platinum Unhedged Fund first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 12.4%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -4.87% and -25.25% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Platinum Unhedged Fund has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Specialised Index of -12.32% and 0.69% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Platinum Unhedged Fund has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Large Specialised Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Large Specialised Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Platinum Unhedged Fund provide?

Platinum Unhedged Fund has a correlation coefficient of 0.84 and a beta of 0.73 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Specialised Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Platinum Unhedged Fund and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Platinum Unhedged Fund with the Developed -World Index?

For a full quantitative report on Platinum Unhedged Fund compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Platinum Unhedged Fund to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Platinum Unhedged Fund financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Platinum Unhedged Fund been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Platinum Unhedged Fund?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Platinum Unhedged Fund please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Platinum Unhedged Fund?

If you would like to get in contact with the Platinum Unhedged Fund manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Platinum Unhedged Fund. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Video Gallery

No current media available.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The Fund (C Class) returned 2.0% for the quarter.1 In terms of major positions, notable contributors to performance included Indian low-cost air carrier InterGlobe Aviation (+37%), Australian energy utility AGL Energy (+34%), social media giant Meta Platforms (+35%) and US luxury furniture retailer RH (+32% from our first entry point during the quarter).

With regards to InterGlobe Aviation, the investment case is playing out. With its competition largely eliminated post-COVID, we are now seeing price discipline return to the Indian airfare market, which can drive very large increases in profitability. The move in Meta was driven by the continued change in perception around the company, going from being secularly challenged by TikTok and a loss of advertising eff ectiveness to now successfully solving these problems. Finally, RH is a rare story of a retailer successfully moving upmarket with a unique founder and a mentality of experimentation. The stock fell 65% post the COVID sugar rush of goods spending, giving us a good entry for the long term, and the stock has started to rise as the market is beginning to look through the weakness in the luxury housing market.2

The main detractors from performance were our Chinese positions, with every holding except PICC giving up ground.

Four of our top five detractors were Chinese stocks (AK Medical -26%, Tencent -14%, ZTO Express -12% and Weichai Power -9%).

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The Fund (C Class) returned 9.7% over the quarter.

While contributors to performance were quite broad, the largest pockets came from our investments in:

1. Travel – European ultra-low-cost airline Wizz Air was our largest contributor, with its share price rising 56% over the quarter as air travel demand and ticket pricing continued to rise post-COVID. Gains were also seen in our positions in Booking Holdings (+32%), Trip.com (+10%) and Airbus (+11%).

2. Semiconductors – The main fear that investors have around the semiconductor industry is the current downturn in the cycle as demand for consumer goods (PCs, mobile phones, appliances) has fallen away post the COVID spending boom. Recent results indicate the current downturn may be coming to an end, and demand in auto and industrial semiconductors remains strong (driven by content growth from electrification and driver-assistance systems). In response, our investments in Infineon Technologies (+33%), Micron Technology (+21%), Microchip Technology (+19%) and NXP Semiconductors (+8% since our first entry point during the quarter) all rose.

3. China – As we mentioned last quarter, Chinese stocks had increasingly been seen as ‘untouchable’ due to geopolitical concerns; the fear of loss took over and investors fled, resulting in heavy discounting in stock prices in the process. As confidence in the economic recovery builds following the end of the zero-COVID policy and Chinese companies begin to report stronger results and outlooks, this fear is subsiding, and investors are increasingly returning to this market. This combination saw gains across a number of our Chinese holdings, in particular, Tencent (+22%) and Weichai Power (+20%).

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The Fund (C Class) finished the year on a strong note, rising 11.0% over the December quarter.

The main contributors to the Fund’s quarterly return were clustered in our Chinese and European holdings. Over the year, both of these regions had become ”untouchable” for investors on account of the geopolitics for China, and access to natural gas for Europe, with stocks being heavily discounted as a result. In both cases, a more favourable outcome has occurred, with Europe showing the ability to reduce gas usage to avert the most dire energy shortage scenarios and China spectacularly throwing off its zeroCOVID policy shackles, which will drive an economic recovery far quicker than most had expected.

This more positive outlook for both regions drove large moves in our major Chinese holdings, such as Weichai Power (+41%), Trip.com (+26%), AK Medical (+27%) and Tencent (+25%). In Europe, the standout contributors were Erste Bank (+32%), Airbus (+25%), Wizz Air (+20%), Infineon Technologies (+25%) and Intesa Sanpaolo (22%).

Detractors for the quarter were relatively limited. Of the major positions, the most notable moves were seen in financial products sales/administration platform Allfunds (-14%) and precision components manufacturer MinebeaMitsumi (-8%). In each case, the driver of these falls was more market-related than stock-specific, with Minebea reacting to the recent strengthening of the Japanese yen, and Allfunds, whose revenue relies on a percentage of assets under management, gyrating with bond and equity markets.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The Fund (C Class) returned -1.0% over the quarter. The major global equity markets continued their downward trend, with the US (-5%), European (-4%), and Korean (-8%) markets all reaching new 52-week lows. China was the hardest hit, with the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI) and A-Share indices falling 22% and 15%, respectively. Chinese stocks are in a deep bear market, with the HSCEI now 50% below its high in February 2021. The other major factor in markets was the strength of the US dollar (USD).

The continued interest rate hikes in the US (widening the positive interest rate differential between the USD and major foreign exchange pairs) and the fact that the US is now an energy-independent/exporting nation in a high-energy price environment are driving continued USD strength.

Over the quarter, the USD appreciated another 6-10% vs. the major pairs, and for the year to date, it has appreciated 12% vs. the Chinese yuan, 13% vs. the Australian dollar, 16% vs. the euro, 21% vs. the British pound, and 26% vs. the Japanese yen. Consistent with the large fall in the Chinese market, our major detractors over the quarter tended to be our Chinese stocks, with major holdings Weichai Power and Tencent falling 40% and 25% over the quarter, respectively. Outside of this, we saw low/mid teen-style declines in tapware and bathroom fi xture manufacturer Lixil (-17%), 5G network equipment player Ciena (-12%), and testing and inspection provider Applus Services (-13%). The fall in Weichai’s share price was linked to its 45% ownership of Kion, a leading German manufacturer of warehouse automation solutions and forklifts, which issued a profit warning on its automation division.

Despite strong demand for the product (increasing labour costs plus improvements in automation capabilities are driving a wave of warehouse automation demand), profi ts in this division have been crunched due to component shortages, cost infl ation and insuffi cient pass-through mechanisms written into legacy contracts. While this is disappointing, the structural demand for automation equipment is real, and Kion should be able to restore profi tability as it works through the problem contracts over time. After the price fall, Weichai is trading on roughly 6x normalised earnings, with US$1.8 billion of net cash on the balance sheet.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

The Fund (C Class) returned 3.2% over the quarter and 32.8% over the year. The global economic picture is still one of strong recovery. The pace of consumer and manufacturing activity in Europe (which had been lagging the US and China) accelerated over the quarter, while company surveys monitoring activity in retail, capital equipment, housing and automobiles point to the US economy being ‘red hot’.

Overall, we expect the global recovery to continue, albeit naturally slowing from its current pace. Investors are alert to any situations that may derail the recovery and two events received a lot of focus in this regard. The first was the Chinese government’s attempts to lower commodity prices by slowing the build-out of some of its infrastructure projects and then announcing they would sell a portion of their strategic stockpiles of copper, aluminium etc. to increase supply. The second event was the messaging from the US Federal Reserve (Fed) that due to the strength in the economy and labour market, they would bring the timing of their first interest rate increase slightly forward. These small steps toward policy normalisation generally drove profit taking in the more economically sensitive stocks and saw buying demand return for high-growth/high-priced names. This trend was evident in the portfolio, with our technology and growth holdings performing better than our cyclical holdings. The standout contributors to the Fund’s performance over the quarter were two Chinese stocks, CStone Pharmaceuticals and Li Ning.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2022

The Fund (C Class) returned -12.1% for the quarter and -9.4% for the year.¹ The Russian invasion of Ukraine and the government and corporate-imposed sanctions that followed was the catalyst for the Fund’s return over the quarter. The first-order effect of the removal of Russian exports from global supply chains (Russia is a major exporter of oil, gas, steel, fertiliser and grains) at a time of already heightened global inflation has required investors to question their prior assumptions around the likelihood of a recession and the future level of interest rates. The invasion has also put the spotlight back on the state of US-China relations, with foreign investors selling Chinese stocks in fear of sanctions being broadened to that country. In terms of our holdings, price falls tended to be clustered in our Chinese companies, businesses with exposure to Eastern Europe, and industrials. Our commodity producers posted strong gains.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2021

The Fund (C Class) returned -0.3% for the quarter and 32.9% for the year.’
Over the past six months the value of the Fund has effectively tracked sideways, rising close to 3%, whilst the broader market has pushed higher. There are two main factors behind this:
1. The first is, since late May, a number of our companies with cyclical exposure have seen their stock prices fall 5-15%, as the delta variant spread rapidly around the world and investors began questioning whether the economy will begin to weaken from here. These pullbacks have offset gains elsewhere in the portfolio.

2. The second is the market reaction to the regulatory wave in China, which resulted in a blanket market sell-down. Roughly 20% of the Fund is invested in China, and in aggregate those stocks fell 10%, representing a drag of 2% on performance. Whilst a 2% drag is not large in absolute terms, it meant that 20% of the portfolio did not participate in the rally seen elsewhere.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee