Platinum International Fund is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Platinum International Fund has Assets Under Management of 8.23 BN with a management fee of 1.35%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.3%.
The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Platinum International Fund has returned 3.34% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 4.73% annualised and 10.29% each year since inception, which is when the Platinum International Fund first started.
There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Platinum International Fund first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 10.29%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -4.7% and -18.33% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.
Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Platinum International Fund has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index of -6.93% and -1.03% since inception.
Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Platinum International Fund has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.
For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
Platinum International Fund has a correlation coefficient of 0.86 and a beta of 0.91 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.
For a full quantitative report on Platinum International Fund and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.
For a full quantitative report on Platinum International Fund compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.
To sort and compare the Platinum International Fund financial metrics, please refer to the table above.
This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.
SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Platinum International Fund. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.
The Fund (C Class) returned -0.9% for the quarter compared with the market’s return of 6.8%. Over the year, the Fund returned 13.9% compared with the market’s return of 20.4%.1
Three main factors led to the Fund underperforming the market over the past quarter:
• The recovery in markets this year has been led by an extraordinary bounce in the technology sector, up 40% in the first six months of the year and 13% for the quarter.2
• China’s stock markets performed poorly over the quarter due to concerns about the subdued nature of the country’s economic rebound and ongoing political tensions with the US. As a result, the Fund’s holdings in Chinese companies reduced returns by 1.5%.
• The Fund’s positioning remained cautious, with an average net invested position of 71% and an average short position of 15%. Our short positions detracted 2.5% from performance over the quarter. While this is a disappointing outcome in the short term, we remain of the view that the popular growth stocks that have driven the market this quarter remain unattractive and are best avoided, and better returns can be found in out-offavour areas such as China. We will expand on this later in the report.
The Fund (C Class) returned 17.7% for the year, a 13.9% outperformance of the market, which returned 3.8%.1 The Fund’s long portfolio performed well, returning 10.7% (for an overall contribution to performance of 8.4%), which was supplemented by a strong 8.8% contribution from our short positions.2 The year was characterised by the deflating of the speculative bubble in growth stocks and illustrates the benefit of Platinum’s investment approach of seeking out opportunities in areas that are ‘out of favour’ with investors and avoiding the ‘much-loved’ investment ideas of the day. We believe the past year represents a strong start to the Fund’s performance in the current bear market in global equities.
The Fund returned 5.4% for the quarter, compared with the market’s return of 8.7%. Market returns in local currency terms were similar across regions, with Europe up 8.5%, North America up 7.4% and Japan up 7.1%, with Asia ex-Japan being the exception, up only 4.5%.3 However, there were significant divergences by sector, as investors responded to the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse by seeking out perceived safe havens in growth stocks and selling economically sensitive sectors. Information Technology was up 20.3% while Energy fell 3.5%. Those sectors in the eye of the storm also performed poorly, with Financials down 1.8% and Real Estate up 0.5%.
The Fund (C Class) returned 10.4% over the quarter.
The US equity market underperformed the rest of the world during the quarter, as markets started factoring in the impact of tighter fiscal and monetary policies on future company earnings. By region, in local currency terms, Europe led the way, returning 10.6%, followed by Asia ex-Japan (+8.2%) and North America (+6.9%).
In line with these outcomes, our European holdings dominated the largest contributors to performance, with financial stocks Intesa Sanpaolo (+22%), Beazley (+21%), Erste (+32%) and Raiff eisen Bank International (+26%) amongst the best performers. In China, online travel agent Trip.com (+26%) was a strong performer on the back of China’s pivot away from its zero-COVID policy. Heavy-duty truck engine manufacturer Weichai Power (+41%), insurer Ping An Insurance (+32%) and Tencent (+25%) also provided strong performance. Short positions contributed 0.9% to returns.
Key detractors at an individual stock level included Allfunds Group (-14%), which was impacted by volatile markets and the sell-down of significant stakes by two large shareholders, and precision components manufacturer MinebeaMitsumi (-8%), which weakened on a stronger Japanese yen.
The Fund (C Class) returned -1.3% over the quarter.¹ The largest contributors to performance were an eclectic mix, including InterGlobe Aviation (+16%), UPM-Kymmene (+12%), and Microchip (+5%). European fi nancials (Raiffeisen Bank +18%, Beazley +13%, Allfunds +3%) also contributed to performance. Shorts contributed 1.3%. Our Chinese holdings were key detractors from performance over the quarter, with major holdings Weichai Power (-40%), Alibaba (-30%), and Tencent (-25%) falling sharply.
Over the year, the Fund returned -6.4% compared with the market’s return of -10.9%. In the fi rst nine months of 2022, a period that coincides with the beginning of the current bear market in global equities, the Fund returned -6.6%, well ahead of the market’s decline of -15.9%. When examining the performance of global stock markets over the last 12 months, there have been some drivers of market performance that we have clearly anticipated and for which the portfolio has been well positioned, and others for which the portfolio holdings were not ideal.
Having said that, as long-term investors, we are making decisions based on views of the long-term earnings power of businesses, knowing full well that short-term economic trends may not be in our favour. Indeed, it is often the fear of short-term trends that provides the greatest opportunities. Still, given the extraordinary macroeconomic environment that has been the backdrop for investing over the last 12 months, it is worth examining how these variables have contributed to or detracted from the Fund’s returns.
The Fund (C Class) returned -1.9% for the quarter and -11.5% for the year.¹
The economic situation in Europe is deteriorating. Most worryingly, consumer price inflation accelerated to 8.1% per annum in May. This compares to a rate of under 2% a year ago.²
A silver lining is that underlying or ‘core’ inflation (excluding food, energy, alcohol and tobacco) is lower in Europe (3.8%) than in the United States (6.0%). The implication is that this affords the European Central Bank the ability to tighten monetary conditions with less urgency and aggression than the US Federal Reserve. This will see less pressure applied to asset owners and large borrowers, namely governments.
However, one key reason that core inflation is lower in Europe is that wage growth is running at a comparatively pedestrian 2.7% per annum. While this may spare the region from more aggressive rate hikes, it puts ordinary households under signifi cant stress as their purchasing power erodes. Indeed, real household incomes are currently falling 5.4% per annum.
Unsurprisingly, consumer sentiment has plummeted to levels only previously observed during times of crisis.
For now, the unemployment rate remains low, by European standards, at 6.8%. This should be supported in the near term by business sentiment, which remains comparatively buoyant despite having pulled back from recent highs.
However, these data are backward-looking. It is unrealistic to expect this situation to persist with a strained household sector, the war in Ukraine, ongoing supply-chain disruptions, rolling lockdowns in China, rising interest rates and potential energy shortages.
Against this backdrop, the relatively resilient performance of European equity markets – at least up until early June – has been remarkable. We took the decision in late March to
position the portfolio much more defensively. Our net
invested position was reduced from 73% to as low as 50% during the quarter, achieved through a combination of
individual stock shorts, index shorts and holding cash. This defensive positioning made a strong positive contribution to our performance.
The best-performing sectors in Europe over the last three months were Energy, Consumer Staples, Utilities and
Pharmaceuticals. The Fund has very little exposure to these sectors, which significantly hurt our relative performance.
Within the Fund, our best-performing stock was Sardinian oil refi ner Saras (+99%). Saras is benefiting from skyrocketing refi ning margins. The elevated margins reflect an underlying erosion of supply conditions, including economic sanctions on Russia, lower refining activity in China, refinery closures in many markets, and extended supply chains as traders
struggle to redirect products with limited shipping capacity.
Saras’ position as a coastal refinery in the middle of the Mediterranean with the ability to process a broad array of crudes bestows it with considerable flexibility over both inputs and outputs. This leaves it well-placed to benefit under such conditions.
The Fund (C Class) returned 2.5% for the quarter, well ahead of the market’s 7.9% decline.¹
The key factor driving markets was the decision by the US Federal Reserve (Fed) to sharply increase interest rates from 0.5% to 1.75% over the course of the quarter in response to the accelerating rate of inflation. This resulted in a signifi cant setback for the popular growth stocks that have led the bull market over the last three years. Notably, the US market was the weakest of the developed markets over the period (-17% in local currency terms), reflecting its heavy weighting to such companies. Asia (-6%), particularly China (+5%), was the notable outperformer for the quarter.²
Our short positions were the strongest contributor to the Fund’s performance, adding 7% to returns. On the long side, many of our Chinese investments provided a positive return, a good outcome given market circumstances. Online travel agent Trip.com (+19% over the quarter), parcel delivery giant ZTO Express (+10%) and property developer China
Overseas Land & Investment (+6%) were key contributors to performance. Contributors outside of China included energy companies Saras (+99%) and Suncor Energy (+11%), global insurance player Beazley (+19%) and Japanese bathroom fixtures manufacturer Lixil (+11%).
Detractors from performance included Allfunds (European fund platform, -30%) and St. James’s Place (UK wealth management, -24%). Both businesses have revenue streams based on assets under management, and as such, falling stock markets reduce short-term earnings. MinbeaMitsumi
(industrial and electronic components, -14%) and Microchip Technology (semiconductors, -23%) saw share price declines due to concerns around slowing global growth prospects.
The Fund (C Class) returned -7.7% for the quarter, marginally ahead of the market’s -8.4% return. The performance within the Fund and markets differed dramatically over the course of the quarter. In the period prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Fund returned 2.3% while the market fell -8.6%. This period was marked by rising interest rate expectations as the global economy continued its post-pandemic recovery.
During these initial weeks of the quarter, expensive growth stocks performed poorly with the Fund benefiting from short positions in these types of companies. Post the invasion, stocks that were poised to benefit from the economic recovery, such as cyclicals, travel stocks and European banks, experienced significant price falls, as did Chinese companies, reflecting concerns about geopolitical risk and the struggling Chinese economy as it faced a new wave of COVID-19 infections. Investors once again favoured the growth names, with the growth-heavy US Nasdaq 100 Index finishing up 10% over this period. During the final weeks of the quarter, the Fund ceded its strong absolute and relative performance of the earlier period to finish slightly ahead of the market.
Product Snapshot
Product Overview
Performance Review
Peer Comparison
Product Details