MLC Wholesale Global Property A (MLC0786AU) Report & Performance

What is the MLC Wholesale Global Property A fund?

MLC Wholesale Global Property A aims to outperform the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Index (net dividends reinvested, hedged into Australian dollars), before fees, over 5 year periods. The fund invests primarily in property securities around the world, including listed Real Estate Investment Trusts and companies across most major listed property sectors. It does not normally invest in direct property.

  • Foreign currency exposures will generally be substantially hedged to the Australian dollar.
  • Multi-manager approach
  • Asset allocation is 100% Global listed property securities

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For MLC Wholesale Global Property A

MLC Wholesale Global Property A Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global Developed (A$ hedged) index (‘market benchmark’) returned -5.2% in Australian dollar terms in the quarter to 30 September 2023.

The fund returned -5.1% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the quarter, which was 0.1% ahead of the market benchmark.

European Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) generated the highest returns for the quarter, led by the German residential landlords which seemingly benefitted from a reduction in investor concerns about their over-levered balance sheets.

Japanese property companies benefited from a supportive inflation and interest rate dynamic and the continued enthusiasm for Japanese shares. Japan is one of the few developed markets where property transaction markets are active and values are stable.

Hong Kong continues to be weighed down by weak growth in mainland China, imported US monetary policy via its currency peg compounded by liquidity challenges in listed Chinese property developers. The latest developer to grab headlines due to missed dollar debt payments is Country Garden, once China’s largest developer by revenue it now faces liquidity strains and material uncertainty on its ability to continue as going concern.

UK REITs had somewhat of a reprieve as inflation data came in below expectations, lowering market pricing of future interest rate increases. With UK benchmark rates relatively unchanged for the quarter, performance was largely driven by stock specific factors.

During the quarter, Presima and Blackrock outperformed.

The fund returned -0.5% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the year to 30 September 2023, which was -0.1% behind the -0.4% return of the market benchmark. Presima and BlackRock outperformed while Resolution underperformed.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
MLC Wholesale Global Property AMLC0786AUManaged FundsProperty and InfrastructureGlobal Listed PropertyProperty - Global Listed Property IndexDvlp Global Real Estate39.72 M0.89%0.00%0.31%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
MLC Wholesale Global Property A1.87%11.42%23.31%-1.15%2.64%16.41%17.9%19.56%-5.07%-31.85%-67.17%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
MLC Wholesale Global Property AProperty - Global Listed Property Index-0.88%-0.7%NA%NA%NA%1.15.03%6.03%0.960.96

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
MLC Wholesale Global Property AYes-https://www.mlc.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is MLC Wholesale Global Property A

MLC Wholesale Global Property A is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Dvlp Global Real Estate and sits inside the Property - Global Listed Property Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The MLC Wholesale Global Property A has Assets Under Management of 39.72 M with a management fee of 0.89%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.31%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the MLC Wholesale Global Property A has returned 1.87% in the last month. The previous three years have returned -1.15% annualised and 19.56% each year since inception, which is when the MLC Wholesale Global Property A first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since MLC Wholesale Global Property A first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 19.56%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -5.07% and -67.17% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The MLC Wholesale Global Property A has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Property - Global Listed Property Index of -0.88% and -0.7% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. MLC Wholesale Global Property A has produced Alpha over the Property - Global Listed Property Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Property - Global Listed Property Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will MLC Wholesale Global Property A provide?

MLC Wholesale Global Property A has a correlation coefficient of 0.96 and a beta of 1.1 when compared to the Property - Global Listed Property Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on MLC Wholesale Global Property A and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the MLC Wholesale Global Property A with the Dvlp Global Real Estate?

For a full quantitative report on MLC Wholesale Global Property A compared to the Dvlp Global Real Estate, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the MLC Wholesale Global Property A to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the MLC Wholesale Global Property A financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the MLC Wholesale Global Property A been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in MLC Wholesale Global Property A?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the MLC Wholesale Global Property A please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the MLC Wholesale Global Property A?

If you would like to get in contact with the MLC Wholesale Global Property A manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the MLC Wholesale Global Property A. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Video Gallery

No current media available.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global Developed (A$ hedged) index (market benchmark) returned 0.1% in Australian dollar terms in the quarter to 31 March 2023. The fund returned 0.5% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the quarter, which was 0.4% ahead of the market benchmark.

The first quarter of 2023 started well as Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT’s) updated investors on broadly sound results for 2022 and positive operating conditions continuing. Encouragingly, in the context of the recent significant increase in interest rates and earnings downgrades in other segments of the share market, REIT earnings guidance for 2023 pointed to further growth although marked by expected softer leasing conditions in the second half of the year.

A good old-fashioned US bank run (thanks to the troubles at Silicon Valley Bank) shook commercial real estate (CRE) markets which rely on banks for finance. Furthermore, given that commercial real estate corrections have often accompanied (or indeed caused) bank crises in the past, it is not surprising that commercial real estate and REITs came under pressure.

Small and regional US banks are important lenders to the sector, accounting for around 38% of total CRE mortgage debt outstanding. As such we expect credit conditions to tighten for the broader commercial real estate market, even if at this point, we see limited signs of excess specific to the CRE sector which would cause systemic failure.

Over the past decade most REITs have improved their capital structures materially and diversified their borrowings away from banks to a range of capital providers, particularly by accessing unsecured corporate debt markets. With few exceptions, the REITs are positioned to be good customers for financiers which continue to be in the business of lending money to good quality credits.

Self-storage was the best performing property sector with a total return of 12.4% in local currency terms driven by mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the US.

Office was the weakest performing sector over the quarter with a total return of -8.4% in local currency terms. Longer term structural headwinds from hybrid working, combined with near-term concerns around the economy and the unfolding banking crisis weighed on office stocks. Most of the worst performing stocks were US office names, which fell more than 20% over the quarter and are now down 60-75% from pre-pandemic highs. The drawdowns in the US office stocks are approaching peak-to trough levels experienced during the GFC, while office REITs in other countries have not suffered to the same extent.

During the quarter, Presima, Resolution and BlackRock all outperformed.

The fund returned -22.0% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the year to 31 March 2023, which was -0.7% behind the -21.3% return of the market benchmark. Presima outperformed while BlackRock and Resolution underperformed.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global Developed (A$ hedged) index (market benchmark) returned 0.1% in Australian dollar terms in the quarter to 31 March 2023. The fund returned 0.5% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the quarter, which was 0.4% ahead of the market benchmark.

The first quarter of 2023 started well as Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT’s) updated investors on broadly sound results for 2022 and positive operating conditions continuing. Encouragingly, in the context of the recent significant increase in interest rates and earnings downgrades in other segments of the share market, REIT earnings guidance for 2023 pointed to further growth although marked by expected softer leasing conditions in the second half of the year.

A good old-fashioned US bank run (thanks to the troubles at Silicon Valley Bank) shook commercial real estate (CRE) markets which rely on banks for finance. Furthermore, given that commercial real estate corrections have often accompanied (or indeed caused) bank crises in the past, it is not surprising that commercial real estate and REITs came under pressure.

Small and regional US banks are important lenders to the sector, accounting for around 38% of total CRE mortgage debt outstanding. As such we expect credit conditions to tighten for the broader commercial real estate market, even if at this point, we see limited signs of excess specific to the CRE sector which would cause systemic failure.

Over the past decade most REITs have improved their capital structures materially and diversified their borrowings away from banks to a range of capital providers, particularly by accessing unsecured corporate debt markets. With few exceptions, the REITs are positioned to be good customers for financiers which continue to be in the business of lending money to good quality credits.

Self-storage was the best performing property sector with a total return of 12.4% in local currency terms driven by mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the US.

Office was the weakest performing sector over the quarter with a total return of -8.4% in local currency terms. Longer term structural headwinds from hybrid working, combined with near-term concerns around the economy and the unfolding banking crisis weighed on office stocks. Most of the worst performing stocks were US office names, which fell more than 20% over the quarter and are now down 60-75% from pre-pandemic highs. The drawdowns in the US office stocks are approaching peak-to trough levels experienced during the GFC, while office REITs in other countries have not suffered to the same extent.

During the quarter, Presima, Resolution and BlackRock all outperformed.

The fund returned -22.0% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the year to 31 March 2023, which was -0.7% behind the -21.3% return of the market benchmark. Presima outperformed while BlackRock and Resolution underperformed.

Please refer to the ‘Market commentary’ for an overview of what happened in other domestic and global markets over the quarter.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global Developed (A$ hedged) index (‘market benchmark’) returned 4.1% in Australian dollar terms in the quarter to 31 December 2022. The fund returned 2.6% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the quarter, which was -1.5% behind the market benchmark.

During the quarter, news broke that several high-profile U.S. unlisted real estate funds implemented restrictions on investor redemptions, including those by Blackstone and Starwood. The move to limit redemptions was in response to elevated redemption requests in the December quarter, and they follow similar actions by UK real estate funds earlier in 2022. Importantly, we expect that these private funds will have now turned from being net buyers to net sellers of properties in the coming year.

Residential has been on watch for the effects that rising rates and a cooling economy have on the outlook for jobs and rental housing demand. News of Big Tech and Wall Street job layoffs added fuel to fears that tenant demand would dissipate with losses of higher-paying jobs. Supply of new apartments remains a continued concern as construction levels are rising nationally.

In terms of office, workers are returning to offices, but it is a slow burn. In some markets, utilisation levels, while up from pandemic lows, remain stubbornly stuck as workers have not been willing to return to traditional work settings on a more frequent basis. Further weakening in office market fundamentals was evident as news of corporate layoffs increased in an environment where office leasing demand was already weak. Many traditional office markets have experienced declining net effective rents over the past two years due to a combination of lower face rates and higher lease incentives (rent free periods and fit-out allowances). In many markets, net effective rents (ie adjusting for lease incentives) are 30-40% below headline rents.

During the quarter, Presima, Resolution and Blackrock all underperformed. The fund returned -24.7% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the year to 31 December 2022, which was -0.5% behind the market benchmark. Presima outperformed while Blackrock and Resolution underperformed over the year.

Please refer to the ‘Market commentary’ for an overview of what happened in other domestic and global markets over the quarter.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global Developed (A$ hedged) index (‘market benchmark’) returned -10.5% in Australian dollar terms in the quarter to 30 September 2022.

The fund returned -10.3% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the quarter, which was 0.2% ahead of the market benchmark.

During the quarter, Presima and Resolution outperformed while BlackRock underperformed.

Given the heightened market volatility and specifically the political environment in the UK it was no surprise that UK Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) were the worst performing for the quarter producing a total return of -19% (in local currency).

Listed Japanese real estate was a relative bright spot in terms of returns (in local currency) as the market benefitted from rising – albeit modest – inflation and the Bank of Japan’s commitment to maintain its yield curve control policy.

In terms of sector performance, US hotels continue to benefit from the normalisation in travel patterns as COVID concerns abate and cashed-up leisure travellers satiate their pent-up demand for holidays after two years of restrictions. Whilst business travel is rebounding, to what extent it fully recovers remains an open debate but in the near-term US hotels are enjoying reasonable demand, pricing power and a lower supply outlook than they have faced in many years.

The self-storage sector performed well during the quarter as rent growth continues despite occupancy moderating and trading conditions normalising after the pandemic demand surge.

Shopping centre vacancy across the US fell to 6.1% in the second quarter this year, the lowest level in 15 years according to Cushman & Wakefield. Notably this year is on track to be the first for net store openings across the US since 2016.

Logistics REITs were rocked in the quarter by underwhelming results from global logistics operator FedEx. While demand indicators may be weakening, infill logistics landlords continue to enjoy reasonable pricing power with many having significant rent reversion in the coming years.

The fund returned -18.8% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the year to 30 September 2022, which was 0.9% above the -19.7% return of the market benchmark. Resolution Capital and Presima outperformed while Blackrock underperformed.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

The FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global Developed (A$ hedged) index (‘market benchmark’) returned -15.6% in Australian dollar terms in the quarter to 30 June 2022. The fund returned -15.7% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged-8.8.) in the quarter, which was -0.1% behind the market benchmark.

During the quarter, Presima outperformed while BlackRock underperformed. Resolution performed in-line with benchmark. The fund returned -8.9% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the year to 30 June 2022, which was 1.6% above the -10.5% return of the market benchmark. Resolution Capital and Presima outperformed and Blackrock underperformed.

Continuing a pattern of elevated market volatility extending back to 2019, the June 2022 quarter saw investors respond to a range of increasing economic and monetary policy headwinds with a significant sell off across multiple asset classes. Swedish and German listed real estate markets were hit hardest, generating total returns in local currency of –40% and -28% respectively. Listed Japanese real estate was one of the few markets to buck the trend, generating an overall positive return of circa 1%, Whilst Japanese Real Estate Investment Trusts (J-REITs) experienced a modest decline with a circa -2% total return, Japanese Developers posted gains. Singapore REITs (S-REITs) performed relatively strongly in the sell-off as the market suffered “only” a 4% decline for the quarter in local currency terms.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2021

The fund returned -2.6% for the quarter and 3.2% in the year to 31 March 2021 (before fees and tax). The fund outperformed the benchmark by 0.3% for the quarter and by 3.6% over the year.

Global debt delivered a disappointing negative return for the March quarter. However, this reflects strong optimism for better health outcomes and economic activity for 2021. Promising news on virus vaccines and the strong rebound in economic activity in Australia and the US have seen longer term government yields rise sharply over the past three months. Inflation concerns given rising commodity prices and significant supply disruptions have also caused consternation in bond markets.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2020

The FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global Developed (A$ hedged) index (‘market benchmark’) returned 10.6% in Australian dollar terms in the quarter to 31 December 2020.

The fund returned 9.7% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) in the quarter, which was 0.9% below the market benchmark.

The announcement in November of successful vaccine developments which will potentially provide a path to social normalisation and gradual restoration of usual business practices helped the sector rebound strongly in the quarter. Development and eventual rollout of the vaccines is expected to be positive for real estate as this greatly improves the prospect of returning to physical shopping, dining out at restaurants, watching movies in cinemas, business and leisure travel and working in the office to a greater extent than has been possible during the pandemic.

The positive vaccine news drove a sharp rotation into real estate sectors that have been most challenged by the pandemic. Hotel and retail property real estate investment trusts (REITs) performed the strongest while, in contrast and unlike previous quarters, the returns of industrial, self-storage and data centres/towers were more subdued.

Country specific REIT market returns were broadly positive. France (22.3%) and Australia (13.2%) delivered the highest returns as both markets have a high exposure to retail property landlords. The UK market (11.7%) also rebounded while the US REIT market return was 5.0%. During the quarter, Morgan Stanley outperformed while Presima and Resolution Capital underperformed the unhedged market benchmark.

The fund returned -15.5% (before fees and tax, A$ hedged) for the year to 31 December 2020, which was 1.8% below the -13.7% return of the market benchmark. Morgan Stanley recorded a large performance shortfall relative to the unhedged market benchmark, due in part to their holdings of retail and office-based REITs while Resolution Capital and Presima outperformed.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee