Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A (SSB0066AU) Report & Performance

What is the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A fund?

Legg Mason Martin Currie Global LT Uncon A aims to provide capital appreciation through investment in global equities (ex Australia). The Fund is expected to generate returns in excess of the Morgan Stanley Capital International (‘MSCI’) All Country World Index (‘ACWI’) (ex Australia) expressed in Australian dollars over rolling five-year periods with lower volatility.

  • The Fund is unhedged and performance is measured in Australian dollars before fees and taxes.
  • The investment process of the Fund is designed to identify companies with a consistent ten year record of delivering a return on invested capital in excess of the weighted average cost of capital, where goodwill is not a dominant asset on the balance sheet and where free-float market capitalization is in excess of $5bn.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A

Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The Fund was down 8.10% over the month of September, in comparison the benchmark as measured by (MSCI All Country World Index (Ex Australia) expressed in AUD was down 3.82% in September. At the Fund level, positives included Wuxi Biologics, the world’s number two in CRDMO (an outsourced contract research, development, and manufacturing company for biologic drugs for pharma and biotech) continued its recovery on the back of improved biotech funding and the end of destocking. Atlas Copco held up better following two strong sets of quarterly results and in the absence of specific news flow in September.

On the other side, ASML was down last month, on the back of news flow that the US government was planning additional curbs on semiconductor exports to China as early as October. We do not expect this will impact ASML’s ability to continue to ship their low-end immersion system to China as is currently allowed under the rules. In the unlikely event that it does, China should purchase more of the less productive tools and any lost production may incrementally be added outside of China. Moncler fell alongside luxury goods sector last month, in the absence of stock specific news flow. Broadly speaking, the sector was impacted by growth normalisation in the US and Europe (from unusually high levels during Covid), which partly offset a recovery in Asia/China. Our conviction in Moncler and the luxury goods sector remains strong. Nvidia was impacted by the broader sell-off in the tech sector and could be partly affected by the statement from Microsoft chief technology officer that the supply of Nvidia’s graphics processing units (GPUs) was “still tight” but improving. However, Microsoft was early in the queue to benefit from any ramp-up in Nvidia’s supply and this doesn’t change the broader picture that there remains a significant shortage of demand for Nvidia’s GPUs overall.

While much of the positive investor sentiment during the first half of 2023 came from expectations that the US federal funds rate might be close to peaking, we believe inflation could remain higher and longer lasting generally. It will be critical to continue to observe wage inflation trends, as these have the potential to turn inflation into a more structural rather than frictional phenomena.

We still believe central banks (both the Fed and the ECB notably) are unlikely to pivot until sometime in H2 2024. Central banks have now shifted to being more data-dependent, which will bring more volatility with every data point. We note that expectations of rate cuts in 2023 have now evaporated, and also note that expectations of a rapid shift towards cuts in H1 2024 have now been pushed into H2, closer to our initial and current view. In any case, whether we see a pivot early in 2024, or later on that year, we are closer to the end of the rate hike cycle, which we forecast to happen by the end of this year, which should itself be supportive for Quality and Growth stocks in our view.

In terms of the macroeconomic cycle, China’s reopening supported our central scenario of a sharp slowdown rather than recession at the global and US level during the first part of the year. Despite the recent loss of momentum on Chinese leading indicators, we expect the Chinese economy to grow at +5-6% this year, albeit more likely at the bottom end of that range, which should in itself be fairly supportive. At the same time, the US economy has been showing impressive resilience, confounding the sceptics and with growth of 2% expected this year. This has led to a more supportive backdrop for global growth. Europe, being more cyclically exposed to China, has experienced a weaker momentum generally, with the region being closer to the stagflation scenario that we had predicted as most likely.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon ASSB0066AUManaged FundsForeign EquityLarge Blend - FundamentalForeign Equity - Large Fundamental IndexDeveloped -World Index10.71 M0.95%0.00%0.25%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A-0.89%0.03%18.65%0.85%9.6%14.94%18.11%13.87%-7.35%-35.28%-35.3%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon AForeign Equity - Large Fundamental Index1.29%-0.91%NA%NA%NA%1.437.98%6.69%0.90.88

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon AYes-https://www.franklintempleton.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A

Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A has Assets Under Management of 10.71 M with a management fee of 0.95%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.25%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A has returned -0.89% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 0.85% annualised and 13.87% each year since inception, which is when the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 13.87%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -7.35% and -35.3% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index of 1.29% and -0.91% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A provide?

Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A has a correlation coefficient of 0.88 and a beta of 1.43 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Fundamental Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A with the Developed -World Index?

For a full quantitative report on Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A?

If you would like to get in contact with the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Legg Mason Martin Currie Glbl LT Uncon A. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The Fund was up 2.35% over the month of June, in comparison the benchmark as measured by (MSCI All Country World Index (Ex Australia) expressed in AUD returned 2.88% in June. At the Fund level, positives included L’Oreal which performed well last month in the absence of specific news flows, with investors continuing to expect positive quarterly momentum from the company. Ferrari performed well last month in the absence of specific news flows, following a strong Q1 result announced in May.

Nvidia continued to perform well in June, following the announcement of its Q1 result on 24 May. This led to a c.40% increase in consensus FY23 revenue forecast, and an almost doubling of consensus earnings estimates. The company is a leader in hardware for generative artificial intelligence. On the other side, the share price of Atlas Copco fell back in June following a strong rally on the back of its quarterly result, in the absence of companyspecific news. Wuxi Biologic’s share price weakness in June was driven by expected below-trend growth in the first half of 2023. This was largely due to scheduled maintenance work, announced at its Capital Markets Day in June. Separately, the company expects softness in early-stage research projects to subside as funding improves in Europe, US and China, with the number of projects recovering to normal levels in 2024 and 2025. Illumina was weak in June amidst broad based caution in life sciences as quasi-peers downgraded expectations and as CEO Francis DeSouza resigned shortly after the long-standing proxy battle came to a conclusion. While Mr DeSouza remains in an advisory role to interim CEO, SVP & General Counsel Charles Dadswell, a search assessing internal & external candidates has commenced. On this basis we see an increased probability that Grail is divested (in 1H24), regardless of the legal outcome of appeals which should refocus the market on the attractive core sequencing business, as it enters an exciting new product cycle with the Novaseq X.

From a positioning perspective, during the month, no new positions were taken or exited within the Fund. While much of the positive investor sentiment during the first quarter of 2023 came from expectations that the US federal funds rate might be close to peaking, we believe inflation is likely to be stickier, and therefore could remain higher and longer-lasting generally. As a result, we believe that central banks might not be finished hiking rates, and still believe that they are unlikely to pivot until sometime in 2024. However, inflation forecasts carry a high degree of prediction error, leading to a wide range of possible monetary policy outcomes. This is what will drive an important bull-bear debate across asset classes and will keep intra-market volatility elevated. An early end to the hiking cycle would be supportive for markets, and for the Quality and Growth equity styles. In any case, we are closer to the end of the rate hike cycle, and this should itself be supportive for Quality and Growth stocks. In terms of the macroeconomic cycle, China’s reopening has supported our central scenario of a sharp slowdown rather than recession at the global and US level for now. There has been a recent loss of momentum on the Chinese manufacturing leading indicators. Nevertheless, we expect the leading indicators to remain well oriented in the months to come, notably on the service side, even if the recovery remains uneven.

The recovery of the world’s second-largest economy also has the potential to be supportive for global leading indicators. On the flip side, the tighter credit lending standards we observed in May, following the regional bank failures in March and April, could lead to higher risks for US economic activity. While this is the case, we note that the proportion of responses showing significant tightening in the Senior Loans Officers’ survey was nowhere near the levels we saw during previous recessions. This is an area we will carefully monitor to assess whether there is increased risk of a US recession.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The Fund was up 8.29% over the month of March and up19.24% over the March quarter, substantially outperforming its benchmark (as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex Australia index) which gained 3.87%.

In march and 8.74% obvert the March quarter. At the Fund level, Nvidia’s share price was strong again in March as it held its GTC conference. The company had already previewed its new Artificial Intelligence (AI) cloud services offering with its Q4 2022 results at the end of February, and the key takeaway from the conference was that AI adoption is spreading across multiple industries. Luxury outerwear firm Moncler’s financial year results highlighted strong performance versus both the market and peers in Q4 2022. US tech giant Microsoft was also strong during March, with technology stocks enjoying a positive month. Swedish conglomerate Assa Abloy underperformed. The company anticipates a legal ruling in April on whether its proposed acquisition of the US- based Hardware & Homeware (HHI) division of Spectrum Brands can proceed. If approved, Assa Abloy could lead the strategically important US DIY channel. UK bootmaker Dr Martens underperformed in March as the market continued to digest January’s profit warning. There was limited news flow in the month but following a meeting with the company we exited the stock (see below). China’s Wuxi Biologics also detracted during the month. The company’s full-year results were in line with expectations, although it needs to expand capacity, which is putting some near-term pressure on margins.

During the month, we exited Dr Martens, as we were unable to rebuild our conviction following January’s weak results and guidance. While much of the positive investor sentiment during Q1 came from expectations that the US Federal Funds rate might be close to peaking, we do not believe this to be the case. We therefore see a major risk of disappointment and volatility for investors expecting an early end to the hiking cycle this year. We still believe central banks are unlikely to pivot until 2024. However, the wide range of possible monetary policy outcomes is what will drive an important bull-bear debate across asset classes. An early end to the hiking cycle would be supportive for markets, and for the Quality and Growth equity style.

On the macroeconomic cycle, with the reopening of China, we expect Chinese leading indicators to continue to show a supportive picture in the months to come. The recovery of the world’s second-largest economy also has the potential to be supportive for global leading indicators, which have been improving slightly, notably for Europe, which is more cyclically exposed to China than the US.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The Fund was down 4.73% over the month of December, outperforming the benchmark (as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex Australia index) which fell 5.17% in December. At the stock level, China’s Wuxi Biologics’ shares were strong as sentiment on China improved.. At broker meetings, the company’s management reiterated strong guidance revenue and profit growth for 2022 and 2023 respectively. Hong Kong-listed insurer AIA saw its positive momentum continue into December, benefiting primarily from an earlier than expected end to China’s zero-Covid policy. The Chinese border reopening should boost AIA’s new business volume gradually but meaningfully from its pandemic low. Nike had a strong month driven by second quarter results. It delivered an excellent set of numbers which beat consensus estimates (7% at sales, 31% at EPS) and drove upgrades for the full year. Nike’s performance was strong across most geographies, while the potential for a Chinese recovery in 2023 is supportive of further momentum. On the other side, Nvidia underperformed through December, as did other semiconductor names, with shorter-term moves affected by cyclical concerns. Online luxury retailer Farfetch underperformed as the market digested the Capital Markets Day held on 1 December. Its share price weakened as investors struggled with the company’s lowered expectations for marketplace growth combined with reduced profitability. Luxury group Kering underperformed in December despite the positive backdrop of China reopening. Whilst the potential uplift from a stronger Chinese consumer should be supportive in 2023, there were concerns about the company’s fourth quarter results as current trends, particularly for Gucci, remain weak. From a Fund positioning perspective, during the month we exited online luxury retailer Farfetch. Our conviction was reduced following disappointing guidance and profitability delivered at the Capital Market Day as outlined above. Concerns were raised around its dependence on the Off White brand partnership with LVMH. We held a follow-up call with the CEO and founder, but our lower conviction was unchanged.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

Global equities (as represented by the MSCI ACWI ex Australia index (AUD)) fell during the month by 3.54%. The Fund was also negative, falling 6.66% in September. Continued concerns over inflation and the outlook for economic growth led to negative returns for developed market indices in September. Both the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve raised interest rates during the month.

Inflationary pressures have remained elevated as a result of the price moves within energy and commodities. Whilst inflation prints have indeed been surprising on the upside across geographies over the summer, the next few datapoints will be critical for setting direction for markets, with weaker prints potentially providing some relief. In the meantime, central banks are likely to continue on their path towards rapid normalisation of monetary policies, with likely stronger and stronger rate hikes to be expected this year, despite the weakening economic momentum.

While we continue to believe we are in a sharp slowdown phase of the economic cycle for 2022, with an ongoing deterioration in leading indicators, and a further upward shift in interest rate expectations, the risk of a bleaker scenario for 2023 has increased. Geopolitical risks also remain omnipresent. In Europe, there is an uncertain backdrop of energy rationing for the coming winter, while in Asia there are increased tensions between China and Taiwan. The rapidly slowing economic cycle could risk leading to downgrades given an already low corporate earnings growth outlook.

While the consensus is still for mid-single digit growth in global earnings in 2022, in our view the Ukraine-Russia armed conflict, Covid-related disruptions in China throughout this year, and deteriorating economic trends are likely to bring this figure to closer to zero at the global level and to -5% at the European level. We anticipate a higher occurrence of profit warnings over the next few quarters, a trend that has already picked up since the start of the year, particularly from corporates with margin pressure linked to more pronounced input cost inflation.

We also expect to see downgrades related to companies exiting from their Russian presences. In such an uncertain environment, with higher risk of downgrades to corporate earnings and scarcity of growth in general, there will be an even greater emphasis in the market on companies with consistent growth, higher structural growth profiles, and with enough pricing power to protect their margins from higher inflationary pressures. We remain focused on companies with strong fundamentals: significant pricing power and solid balance sheets, and with exposure to long-term structural growth themes.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

Global equities (as represented by the MSCI ACWI ex Australia index) fell 4.40% in June. While the Fund in comparison was down 5.44% (net of fees) over the month. Markets correcting sharply in June following worse than expected inflationary data from the US. This saw the US Federal Reserve raise interest rates by 0.75% (the largest hike since 1994) and the Bank of England followed in turn with a 0.25% rise. The European Central Bank also announced its intention to raise rates in July.

The tragic conflict in the Ukraine continued to exacerbate inflation through rising energy and commodity prices (notably food), resulting in a negative impact on both business and consumer confidence. Additionally, China’s zero tolerance policy on Covid brought fears of a renewed supply shock globally across many parts of the supply chain, while also leading to a slowdown in economic activity in the world’s second-largest economy. However, this could improve rapidly as China eases restrictions in the months to come. Market leadership favouring value stocks over quality and growth has been a notable headwind for the portfolio year to date. We believe that quality and growth companies are likely to come back into focus for investors. With the deteriorating macroeconomic outlook, a view reinforced by weaker global Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) data, we believe we are entering a period of earnings downgrades over the next few quarters. In such an environment of higher inflation, lower economic growth and lower earnings growth, there will be an even greater emphasis in the market on companies with consistent growth, higher structural growth profiles, and with enough pricing power to protect their margins from higher inflationary pressures.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2022

Global equities (as represented by the MSCI ACWI ex Australia index) fell during the month, returning -1.44%. The Fund also fell during the month returning -3.76%. The continuing Russian invasion of Ukraine is leading to price increases in energy as well as soft and hard commodities, all of which could contribute further to already elevated inflationary pressures. We believe that there is a strong likelihood of a negative impact on both consumer and business confidence in the months to come.

In March, Nvidia the computer systems designer was among the top performers. On the company’s Analyst Day management provided an update on the firm’s standalone software business that represents over half Nvidia’s long-term opportunity, this is a nascent business with the potential to grow from the low hundreds of millions today into multi-billion opportunity in the future. In addition, the company discussed a US$11 billion design win pipeline across the auto industry. Linde, the industrial gases firm also positive in March, announcing a US$10 billion share repurchase programme and raising the dividend by approximately 10%. The shares reacted positively to this news of an increased return of cash to shareholders by utilising the company’s balance sheet strength,

whilst retaining the capacity to invest in new growth areas. US genetic sequencing firm Illumina reversed weakness following January’s style rotation into value stocks, the company has had a steady stream of product releases including a comprehensive cancer testing panel for the European market. Kering, the French luxury goods company was the largest detractor during the month, The share price has been impacted the current macro and geopolitical backdrop that has created uncertainty around consumer confidence and discretionary income. However, the company had recently posted strong results in February, with improved momentum for the firm’s Gucci brand. In addition, Moncler the Italian luxury jacket company also detracted. Again, the recent weakness has been driven by the significant developments in Europe with the outbreak of war in Ukraine and the threat to consumer confidence and discretionary income posed by significant inflation. The company was particularly exposed to the initial concern as it has a very significant portion of its supply infrastructure in Romania and the market became immediately risk averse around exposure to Eastern Europe. Our interactions with the company confirm that there.

has been no impact to supply or logistics in Romania. In addition, the company had posted strong financial year results in late February, showing good momentum in the seasonally important fourth quarter of 2021. Tencent, the Chinese internet giant was also negative after the company announced results in March that were below market expectations.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2021

Global equities (as represented by the MSCI ACWI ex Australia index) declined during the month, falling -3.02%. The Fund also fell during the month by – 6.47% (net of fees). The month saw markets pull back over concerns over potential interest rate rises and contagion from the Evergrande scandal in the Chinese rea estate sector. The market rotation into value stocks from growth was a notable headwind in September. Mastercard, the US payments firm recovered in September as the negative sentiment arising from the emergence of the COVID-19 Delta variant was countered by a volume update released by a peer, which highlighted the company’s more resilient performance versus market expectation.

Masimo, US medical devices firm performed strongly through September the business presented at a couple of investor conferences and continued its steady release of scientific journals supporting the use of its products. Chinese pharmaceutical stock Wuxi Biologic outperformed during the month although there was sparse news flow it reversed weakness from July and August. On the other side, industrial firm Kingspan and Atlas Copco share prices declined due to September’s rotation into value stocks after strong performance earlier in the year. Abode was also negative over the month, due to market disappointment over the firm’s recurring revenues and the market rotation into value stocks. Over the month there were no transactions in the Fund.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee