JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units (PER0758AU) Report & Performance

What is the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units fund?

To achieve capital appreciation in excess of its Benchmark by investing primarily in securities, globally, using financial derivative instruments where appropriate. The Fund invests primarily either directly or through the use of financial derivative instruments, in equity securities, commodity index instruments, convertible securities, debt securities, deposits with credit institutions and money market instruments. Issuers of these securities may be located in any country, including emerging markets

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units

JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units Fund Commentary August 31, 2023

Month in Review
•Global equity markets moved lower in August, and government bonds failed to offer diversification as yields rose. The Fed reaffirmed its commitment to combat high inflation, while data releases in China and Europe disappointed. The MSCI World Index fell 1.8% and the JPM Global GBI fell 0.3% (hedged to Australian dollar). The fund delivered positive returns.

•US retail sales were stronger than expected, and labour markets showed only marginal evidence of easing, with wages remaining elevated. Against this backdrop, we added a tactical short duration strategy, and took profit after yields repriced higher to reflect the resilient US data momentum and lingering inflation risks. The moves in yields in part drove higher equitymarket volatility, which benefitted our long US volatility strategy. On a view that US growth risks remain, with support from more mixed data later in the month, we added long US duration in late August, which benefitted performance.

•Chinese economic data disappointed across the board, with renewed weakness in the property sector, weak consumer spending and deteriorating credit growth. While stimulus measures were announced, they are expected to have limited impact. Our long US dollar versus short China-centric currencies such as the Australian dollar and Korean won added value. European data, particularly for manufacturing and consumer confidence, was similarly disappointing, which benefitted our short Euro Stoxx position.

•Major technology names retraced some of their previous gains, benefitting our short Nasdaq strategy via futures. While technology and broader equity markets posted negative returns, our select technology names added value due to strong stock selection. Overall, our secular equity was flat as, by contrast, our luxury consumer strategy struggled.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A UnitsPER0758AUManaged FundsAlternativesMacroAlternatives - Macro IndexCredit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index128.93 M0.7%0.00%0.15%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units-1.09%1.97%1.34%-2.42%3.14%5.53%7.87%6.95%-4.93%-13.29%-13.29%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A UnitsAlternatives - Macro Index0.77%0.42%NA%NA%NA%-0.378.13%6.76%-0.280.28

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A UnitsYes-https://www.jpmorganam.com.au/wps/portal/auec/ContactUs-

Product Due Diligence

What is JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units

JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Credit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index and sits inside the Alternatives - Macro Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units has Assets Under Management of 128.93 M with a management fee of 0.7%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.15%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units has returned -1.09% in the last month. The previous three years have returned -2.42% annualised and 6.95% each year since inception, which is when the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 6.95%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -4.93% and -13.29% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Alternatives - Macro Index of 0.77% and 0.42% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units has produced Alpha over the Alternatives - Macro Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Alternatives - Macro Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units provide?

JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units has a correlation coefficient of 0.28 and a beta of -0.37 when compared to the Alternatives - Macro Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units with the Credit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index?

For a full quantitative report on JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units compared to the Credit Suisse AllHedge Global Macro Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units?

If you would like to get in contact with the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the JPMorgan Global Macro Opps Class A Units. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

Month in Review •Global equity markets continued to move higher in July, while sovereign bonds were down. Equities were supported by signs of easing inflation momentum, alongside increased optimism about the outlook for the US and China as well as ongoing AI developments. The MSCI World Index rose 2.8% and the JPM Global GBI fell 0.5% (hedged to Australian dollar). The fund delivered negative returns.

•Growing evidence of easing inflationary pressures globally fuelled hopes of a pause in central-bank tightening and supported risk assets. Our long equity strategies added value, particularly our cloud computing and digital transformation strategies. In the UK, both headline and core inflation eased more than expected. Against this backdrop, UK gilts rallied over the month and we took the opportunity to reduce our long UK duration strategy.

•Activity data in the US remained resilient, including stronger-thanexpected second-quarter GDP growth. Stable activity data, coupled with resilience in labour markets and the aforementioned easing in inflation momentum, supported market optimism about the ability of the US to engineer a soft landing. This weighed on our long US volatility and short US equity derivatives strategies as well as our long US dollar exposure. While this backdrop supported risk assets, rates moved higher in the second half of the month, and we tactically removed our long US duration strategy. With implied volatility remaining low, we took the opportunity to add convexity to the portfolio by pivoting some of our short-biased futures into options strategies.

•Major central banks delivered mixed actions over the month. The US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of Canada hiked rates by 25 basis points, while some central banks held rates steady. Market expectations built around the potential for the Bank of Japan to meaningfully adjust policy, which benefitted our long Japanese yen exposure, and we took profit on our long Japanese yen versus short US dollar strategy.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

•Global equity markets moved higher in June, while sovereign bonds were down. Risk assets performed well amid increased optimism about the outlook for the US and China, as well as AI developments, and despite continued policy tightening from major central banks. Market moves were amplified by the fact that the multiple drivers of optimism coincided and combined with momentum-related flows at a point when liquidity was thin. The fund delivered negative returns.

•US recession risk was priced out as the expected broad data deterioration failed to materialise for another month. Increased optimism about the ability of the US to engineer a soft landing was boosted by well-behaved inflation data. Against this backdrop, our long US volatility, long US duration and short US equity derivatives strategies delivered negative returns.

•Weak Chinese data was brushed aside as expectations rose for significant stimulus, supporting China-related assets. This weighed on our long US dollar versus short China-centric currencies such as the Australian dollar, as well as our broad negative equity beta tilt.

•AI developments were a catalyst for strong technology performance. This benefitted our cloud computing and digital transformation strategies. However, it led to negative performance from our short Nasdaq exposure, which we hold in part as a near-term hedge for our secular equity and because it looks too expensive. We believe the upcoming earnings season may catalyse a reversion if AI developments are not translated into better near-term revenues.

•Major central banks broadly delivered hawkish surprises, with more than expected delivered by the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada and the Reserve Bank of Australia, which worked against our short currency exposures in these countries. The European Central Bank and the US Federal Reserve signalled that they are not done yet in this hiking cycle, while the Bank of Japan continued to leave policy unchanged, which negatively impacted our long Japanese yen exposure held for its defensive properties and the expected path of policy.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

•Global equity and fixed income markets posted small negative returns for May, disguising what was a volatile month for risk assets with significant dispersion in equity sector performance. Markets were largely focused on sticky inflation data, further interest rate rises and commentary from major central banks, as well as uncertainty surrounding the US debt ceiling. The MSCI World Index was down 0.3%, though the tech sector rallied strongly, and the JPM Global GBI fell 0.8% (hedged to Australian dollar). The fund return was negative.

•The tech sector bucked the downward trend in equity markets and rallied strongly as investors re-priced expectations for the impact of advances in Artificial Intelligence. Our long equity strategies held to reflect secular themes such as cloud computing and digital transformation contributed positively. However, we hedged some of this exposure amid the deteriorating economic backdrop with short Nasdaq via futures and this was the biggest detractor from performance for the month. Our short US large cap via options and long US volatility strategies also detracted.

•Activity and sentiment data was mixed, with persistent weakness in manufacturing while services held up better. Europe saw weaker business confidence and retail sales, while manufacturing and consumer spending data in China disappointed. Against this backdrop, our long US dollar versus China-sensitive currencies such as the Australian dollar and South African rand added value.

•Inflation remained elevated and labour markets continued to be tight, prompting a number of major central banks to take another step in their hiking cycles.Against this backdrop, bond yields rose as markets repriced rate hike expectations and we introduced long US and UK duration strategies, which contributed positively.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

Global equity and fixed income markets were volatile amid an unexpected banking crisis. US and European financial sectors sold off sharply and bond yields plummeted before swift action from regulators and policymakers eased investor fears of immediate contagion. The MSCI World Index and the JPM Global GBI were up 2.5% (hedged to Australian dollar). The fund return was positive, benefitting from our flexibility to adjust exposures as the backdrop shifted.

Financial turmoil was sparked by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, followed by the closure of Signature Bank and demise of Credit Suisse within the space of a week. The series of bank failures – the biggest since 2008 – saw bond yields drop and equities sell off sharply, particularly banks, as investors questioned the stability of other institutions. While we did not specifically predict the banking stress, we thought that central banks engaging in the most synchronised and rapid monetary tightening in 50 years was likely to create some casualties.

The portfolio was well positioned for the market moves and benefitted predominantly from long US duration, long US volatility and short equity strategies – we were net short equity at mid-month. Our long secular equity strategies, particularly rate-sensitive exposures such as digital transformation and cloud computing, added value.

Our view on US growth had deteriorated coming into March amid weakening consumer spending and manufacturing data, and we remained concerned about the impact of tightening liquidity. Meanwhile, the recent data improvement in Europe appeared close to a peak. While our view deteriorated, markets remained buoyant, and we sought to take advantage of this potential mispricing by adjusting to a more cautious portfolio. We added to our long US duration and long US volatility strategies and reduced net equity exposure through derivatives and a modest trimming of select names. These strategies performed strongly, and we took profit in the wake of the sell-off, re-risking the portfolio as we felt markets were extended to the downside.

Regulators and policymakers allayed investor fears through swift action that catalysed a rapid equity market rebound from which we benefitted through our long equity strategies before reverting back to our cautious positioning.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

Global equity and fixed income markets moved lower in February as evidence of lingering inflation pressures, continued labour market tightness and resilient growth data drove an upward repricing of monetary policy expectations. The MSCI World Index and JPM Global GBI were both down 1.7% (hedged to Australian dollar). The fund return was negative.

Global inflation data and survey measures showed increasing signs of lingering price pressures, while labour markets remained tight. Key central banks continued to raise rates accordingly, with the US Federal Reserve hiking by 25 basis points (bps) and both the European Central Bank and Bank of England raising rates by 50 bps, while signalling further hikes to come. The combination of incoming data and central bank activity fuelled expectations for an extended path of monetary policy tightening, which weighed on risk assets. Our long equity exposure detracted in aggregate, particularly in rate-sensitive areas such as digital transformation and luxury consumer, although this was partly offset by our Nasdaq exposure held via options. Given the extent of rate moves coupled with the conviction that disinflation should prevail over the medium term, we took profit on our tactical US short duration strategy and switched to a long position, which detracted from performance. Elsewhere, the Bank of Japan saw a change in leadership and shifting policy stance, and we took profit on our long Japanese yen exposure and added long Japanese banks, which contributed positively to performance.

Activity data remained resilient globally, with flash purchasing managers’ indices coming in ahead of expectations. The US saw particular strength in services activity, while Europe continued to show signs of a broadbased recovery, which further supported the rate re-pricing and we consequently closed our Germany flattener strategy. In China, we remain optimistic that the ongoing recovery will continue and saw some improvement in activity levels, although the reopening effect was more muted in other measures. Coupled with the rates backdrop, this hurt our long Australian dollar exposure and long European basic resources versus short Eurostoxx strategy, while we took profit on our long Mexican peso strategy which has performed well this year.

Performance Commentary - January 31, 2023

Global equity and fixed income markets rebounded sharply in January amid further signs of global disinflation, better-than-feared activity data and China’s re-opening. The MSCI World Index was up 6.2% and the JPM Global GBI was up 1.8% (hedged to Australian dollar). The fund return was positive, benefiting from our shift to a more pro-risk stance.

Growing evidence of easing inflationary pressures globally fueled hopes of a slower pace of tightening by central banks and supported risk assets. Increasing net equity exposure early in the month benefited performance.

Our long equity strategies added value, particularly our cloud computing and digital transformation strategies, as well as our long NASDAQ exposure via options on which we took profit. Switching our US dollar exposure from long to short versus long Japanese yen was also beneficial, while a weaker dollar also supported our long gold strategy, which we removed. To reflect our view that markets might be getting too optimistic about central banks slowing, we introduced a tactical short US duration strategy.

Activity data surprised to the upside in China and Europe, supported respectively by the removal of further virus-related restrictions and an improved energy backdrop. Our China-exposed luxury consumer names performed well amid the re-opening. To reflect the better backdrop, we removed our long European healthcare and utilities relative value equity strategies and added long European basic resources equity via futures. We also switched our Australian dollar exposure from short to long and added long Euro versus short Swiss franc with both expressions having a positive beta.

While data was mixed in other regions, the probability rose for a global recovery. This led us to reduce our defensive portfolio tilt beyond China and Europe. We added select semi-conductor names and removed our long US utilities and healthcare versus short US large-cap strategy. We also introduced a long Norwegian Krone versus short Swedish Krone strategy to reflect our view on divergent monetary policy.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

•Global equity and fixed income markets fell sharply in December amid more-hawkish-than-expected central bank policy, while global activity data was mixed. The MSCI World Index dropped 5.1% and the JPM Global GBI was down 1.8% (hedged to Australian dollar). The fund return was negative.

•More-hawkish-than-expected monetary policy weighed on investor sentiment. The European Central Bank delivered a 50 basis-point rate hike coupled with hawkish communication, and announced quantitative tightening measures. Further to this, other key central banks including the US Federal Reserve remained hawkish, and the Bank of Japan made a surprise adjustment to its yield curve control policy. Our long Japanese yen exposure, which we increased over the month, added value, as did our long US versus short Australian duration strategy, long defensive equity relative-value strategies and long gold. Conversely, our long US duration detracted, while our long US technology exposure through our cloud computing and digital transformation strategies also suffered.

•Activity data surprised positively in Europe but remained mixed elsewhere. European business and consumer survey data both came in better than feared, in part supported by an improved energy backdrop, while US data including manufacturing surveys, retail sales and housing was more muted. These mixed developments on growth were coupled with increasing signs of disinflation globally, including the US consumer price index, which delivered a second consecutive downside surprise. We reflected the slightly better balance of risks in the portfolio by bringing net equity exposure out of negative territory, though to levels that remain below our long-run average. This move worked against us in the month.

•China abandoned its strict Covid-19 policy as the government announced the widespread removal of virus-related restrictions. Strategies held in part to reflect our near-term caution on China, such as our short Australian dollar versus long US dollar strategy, detracted amid immediate optimism for China’s reopening. However, this in turn benefited our China-exposed luxury consumer and emerging market financial equity strategies.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee