Janus Henderson Tactical Income (IOF0145AU) Report & Performance

What is the Janus Henderson Tactical Income fund?

Janus Henderson has set Tactical Income seeks to achieve a total return after fees that exceeds the total return of the Benchmark (Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index equally weighted), by investing in a diversified portfolio of predominantly Australian income producing assets.

  • Flexible asset allocation.
  • Indicative asset allocation range : Cash (0-100%), Conservative Fixed Interest (0-100%), Australian Fixed Interest (0-100%), High Yield Securities (0-20%).
  • Derivatives may be used solely for investment and risk management purposes and cannot be used to gear the Fund.
  • The Fund is considered a low-medium investment risk.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Janus Henderson Tactical Income

Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned -0.04% (net) and 0.00% (gross). The Fund outperformed the 50% Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill; 50% Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr (Benchmark) by 0.56% (net) in September, which returned -0.60% over the month. The Fund continues its outperformance, beating the Benchmark over the longer term including by 2.63% (net) over the year, and 1.12% (net) since inception per annum.

Primary markets globally saw a raft of new issuance. Notable local transactions included Westpac who issued a $2.4 billion five-year AA- rated senior unsecured bond at a credit spread of 93bps, and 5% coupon. Leading general insurer Suncorp Group issued a $600m A- rated Tier 2 floating rate note callable in 5.75 years at a credit spread of +235bps above swaps, yielding comfortably above 6% which was well oversubscribed. Sydney toll-road group WestConnex returned to the market with its second Australian Dollar denominated bond transaction. Rated BBB+, this $550m seven-year fixed rate bond was issued at an attractive credit spread of +170bps and a healthy yield of 6.15% for defensive monopolistic infrastructure assets.

We favour overweight positioning in semi government bonds versus government yields, mostly via New South Wales, which contributed positively as semi yields outperformed by 8bps. Active overweights in swap versus bond yields has continued its positive contribution to excess returns as spreads continue to rally to below long term averages. We are electing to take this as an opportunity to take profit and further reduce our overweight exposures.

Australian credit performed positively in September, buoyed by the embedded elevated yields while spreads were broadly unchanged. We remain cautious and selective on credit, buying in the industries we like such as inflation protected industries, senior bank paper, and high quality well collateralised Asset Backed Security (ABS) structures.

Floating rate credit subsectors outperformed for the month with domestic listed hybrids and global loans the top subsectors, while emerging market debt and high yield underperformed due to higher US treasury yields and spreads beginning to widen. Australian Tier 2 continued to outperform delivering returns above bank bills mainly though income advantage, while the hybrid market rebounded from a negative previous month as well as some support driven by APRA announcing a consultation into the local use of additional Tier 1 capital instruments. Now that Tier 2 valuations have moved from attractive to fair, we have actively increased capacity for future issuance that may come with better concessions in tougher market conditions. Relative value opportunities continue to present with some of the domestic primary corporate transactions proving very popular and outperforming the broader market, with spreads rallying 10-15bps despite weaker broader spread conditions.

While not being completely immune to the significant sell off in long duration bonds, for the most part the Tactical Income Fund successfully protected capital over the month. By preserving capital during these periods means it is easier to deliver overall stronger returns over the year. The duration position of the Tactical Income Fund was broadly unchanged in September with duration at 1.69 years at month end.

We remain overweight credit but have moderated positioning as we look for further opportunities and keep powder dry. We have also added credit protection through credit default swaps, creating a high-quality liquid buffer to take advantage of dislocations / opportunities.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Janus Henderson Tactical IncomeIOF0145AUManaged FundsFixed IncomeBonds - AustraliaFixed Income - Bonds - Australia IndexAustralian Bond Composite 0-10Y Index3.59 BN0.45%0.00%0%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Janus Henderson Tactical Income0.38%2.26%6.85%2.94%4.33%2.08%2.51%1.61%-0.6%-3.98%-3.99%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Janus Henderson Tactical IncomeFixed Income - Bonds - Australia Index-0.44%0.34%NA%NA%NA%0.472.42%2.77%0.990.6

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Janus Henderson Tactical IncomeYes-https://www.janushenderson.com/en-au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Janus Henderson Tactical Income

Janus Henderson Tactical Income is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Australian Bond Composite 0-10Y Index and sits inside the Fixed Income - Bonds - Australia Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Janus Henderson Tactical Income has Assets Under Management of 3.59 BN with a management fee of 0.45%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Janus Henderson Tactical Income has returned 0.38% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 2.94% annualised and 1.61% each year since inception, which is when the Janus Henderson Tactical Income first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Janus Henderson Tactical Income first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 1.61%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -0.6% and -3.99% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Janus Henderson Tactical Income has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Fixed Income - Bonds - Australia Index of -0.44% and 0.34% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Janus Henderson Tactical Income has produced Alpha over the Fixed Income - Bonds - Australia Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Fixed Income - Bonds - Australia Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Janus Henderson Tactical Income provide?

Janus Henderson Tactical Income has a correlation coefficient of 0.6 and a beta of 0.47 when compared to the Fixed Income - Bonds - Australia Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Janus Henderson Tactical Income and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Janus Henderson Tactical Income with the Australian Bond Composite 0-10Y Index?

For a full quantitative report on Janus Henderson Tactical Income compared to the Australian Bond Composite 0-10Y Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Janus Henderson Tactical Income to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Janus Henderson Tactical Income financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Janus Henderson Tactical Income been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Janus Henderson Tactical Income?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Janus Henderson Tactical Income please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Janus Henderson Tactical Income?

If you would like to get in contact with the Janus Henderson Tactical Income manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Janus Henderson Tactical Income. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned 0.77% (net) and 0.81% (gross). The Fund outperformed the 50% Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill; 50% Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr (Benchmark) by 0.21% (net) in August, which returned 0.56% over the month. The Fund continues its outperformance, beating the Benchmark over the longer term including by 2.11% (net) over the year, and 1.09% (net) since inception per annum.

We hold an overweight position in semi government bonds, mostly via New South Wales, as well as overweight swap yields over government bond yields. The fall in yields benefitted these positions while on a relative basis to government bonds the spread was broadly unchanged.

Credit performed well in August, buoyed by the embedded elevated yields which offset some spread widening. We took profit on some of the credit in the portfolio, whilst maintaining high quality credit positions that we are comfortable with.

Global loans were the top performing credit subsector for the month, while emerging market debt and high yield underperformed due to higher US treasury yields. In Australian Tier 2 continued to outperform delivering returns above bank bills, while listed hybrids had a negative month due to new supply from NAB. We remain uninvested in domestic hybrids, with our favoured overweight Australian Tier 2 allocation having performed well and adding value. Now that Tier 2 valuations have moved from attractive to fair, we have started to take profit to increase active capacity for future issuance that may come with better concessions. Relative value opportunities are still apparent in this environment and we switched some allocations out at 5.9% yield into the new Lloyds Subordinated notes at 7.09%, which yields more than listed hybrids.

Navigating duration is nuanced and requires active management. After beginning April with a slight negative duration position, we started to see some value presented in bond yields and accelerated repositioning late in June moving to 1.57 years by the end of July. We have continued to chip away at this position in August, taking the position to 1.66 years by month end.

We remain overweight credit but have moderated positioning as we look for further opportunities and keep powder dry. We have also added credit protection through credit default swaps, creating a high-quality liquid buffer to take advantage of dislocations / opportunities.

With higher yields on offer, returns in the Tactical Income Fund should continue to move higher by virtue of its starting point and with successful active management.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned 0.61% (net) and 0.65% (gross). The Fund outperformed the 50% Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill; 50% Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr (Benchmark) by 0.16% (net) in July, which returned 0.45% over the month. The Fund continues its outperformance, beating the Benchmark over the longer term including by 2.61% (net) over the year, and 1.08% (net) since inception per annum.

We hold an overweight position in semi government bonds, mostly via New South Wales, as well as overweight swap yields over government bond yields. The fall in yields benefitted these positions while on a relative basis to government bonds the spread was broadly unchanged. It was a good month of outperformance from credit, returns benefitting from both additional income and some spread tightening. Overweight credit allocations were a positive contributor as a result.

With markets adjusting expectations for a gentler path for policy tightening and slowing growth, this aided higher beta credit sectors across loans, emerging market debt, high yield and hybrids, with all performing well. We remain very modestly allocated across these sectors as market sentiment remains fickle and the impacts of policy tightening are slowly feeding through, with asymmetric downside in our view. Australian Tier 2 continued to exhibit strong outperformance from spreads and income and has been our preferred substitute for lower quality sectors.

The Fund had another strong positive return in this month, outperforming its Benchmark significantly. This is on the back of a strong FY23 return for the Fund which delivered 4.88% (net of fees) outperforming bonds, cash and credit floating-rate note (FRN) market benchmarks over the past 12 months.

Turning points in policy can be tricky for markets to price, but we continue to remain active. We have added duration at much better yield levels. After beginning April with a slight negative duration position, we have started to see some value presented in bond yields and accelerated repositioning late in June moving to 1.6 years by the end of July.

More recently, the Fund has also been profit taking into the rally in spread sectors. We actively moved overweight in bank credit, longer semi government positions, and swap rate positions during 2022 when spreads were cheap and elevated well above average. These positions have contributed strongly to performance over the last few months. At this juncture we remain overweight but have moderated positioning as we look forward for further opportunities and keep powder dry.

With higher yields on offer, returns in the Tactical Income Fund should continue to move higher by virtue of its starting point and with successful active management.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned 0.34% (net) and 0.38% (gross). The Fund outperformed the 50% Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill; 50% Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr (Benchmark) by 1.17% (net) in June, which returned -0.83% on the month. The Fund continues its outperformance, beating the Benchmark over the longer term including by 2.77% (net) over the year, and 1.07% (net) since inception per annum.

Our overweight positioning in semi government bonds, mostly via New South Wales, as well as overweight swap yields over government bond yields both were positive contributors to return and alpha as spreads continued to tighten.

It was a good month of outperformance from credit, returns benefitting from both additional income and some spread tightening. Overweight credit allocations were a positive contributor as a result, and we continued to actively take profit on active positions added during FY23 that have moved from cheap back towards fairer valuations.

In a stronger month for credit loans, emerging market debt, high yield and hybrids all performed well. We remain very modestly allocated across these sectors as conditions remain choppy, with asymmetric downside in our view. Australian Tier 2 also exhibited outperformance from spreads and income and has been our preferred substitute for lower quality sectors.

A positive return in June capped off a strong FY23 return for the Fund which delivered 4.88% (net of fees) outperforming bonds, cash and credit floating-rate note (FRN) market benchmarks over the past 12 months. Performance is pleasing when assessed against the fact that bond markets underperformed cash again in FY23, after a horrendous FY22. Bond markets also delivered a majority of negative monthly returns over the last 12 months with the largest monthly drawdown being -2.5%. Conversely, the Fund delivered investors a majority of positive monthly returns with less drawdown.

Turning points in policy can be tricky for markets to price, and over the FY we saw the bond market exhibit extremely volatile monthly returns. The Australian bond market returns were negative six times over the course of the past year, with a return range of -1.36% to -2.54% each time it occurred even with higher income yields. The results delivered by the Tactical Income Fund are a good reminder of the value of active duration management and credit selection, providing outperformance and a smoother journey for investors across the year.

The decisions to add/take away duration are highly complex and challenging. Over the past 12 months we have managed through the largest duration adjustments since the Fund’s inception. The Fund had almost 4 years interest rate duration at the start of FY23, then trimmed half of that taking profit on one of the strongest bond market rallies seen in years. This year, the Fund moved close to 0 years duration after Credit Suisse/SVB and whilst optically it was a nonconsensus strategy, the positioning was vindicated as it protected investors capital against the bond market which has sold off heavily since then as three- and 10-year government bond yields ended the quarter 110bps and 73bps higher. The Fund delivered 1.23% (net) versus the bond market (Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Year Index) falling by -2.95% over the quarter. Now that the Fund has maintained capacity, we are actively adding duration at much better yield levels. After beginning the quarter with a slight negative duration position, we have started to see some value presented in bond yields and accelerated repositioning late in June moving to 1.4 years.

The Fund has also been profit taking into the rally in spread sectors. We actively moved overweight in bank credit, longer semi government positions, and swap rate positions during 2022 when spreads were cheap and elevated well above average. These all added strongly to the FY result via higher income and capital gains from spreads tightening. At this juncture we remain overweight but have moderated positioning as we look forward for further opportunities.

The future looks challenging from a number of fronts, we remain guarded on taking excessive low-quality risks favouring actively managing better credit quality assets with plenty of powder dry to add exposure into any weakness.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned 0.32% (net) and 0.35% (gross). The Fund outperformed the 50% Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill; 50% Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr (Benchmark) by 0.78% (net) in May, which returned -0.46% on the month. The Fund continues its outperformance, beating the Benchmark over the longer term including by 1.05% (net) over the year, and 0.99% (net) since inception per annum.

Throughout the month we continued to favour overweight positions in semi government bonds, mostly via New South Wales. This position was increased opportunistically during March volatility when spreads became more elevated. Spreads have rallied about 15bps since then and during May we reduced overweights prior to the Victorian government budget announcement, taking profit and contributing positively to performance. Swap linked positions also outperformed government bond yields and overweight positioning added alpha as spreads continued to tighten.

Overweight credit allocations were a positive contributor, benefiting during the month mainly from additional income and constructive spread movements.

Higher yielding credit sectors largely were able to benefit from additional income in the more stable credit conditions. European Loans were the top performing sub sector, followed by Australian Tier 2 with floating rate credit classes outperforming in the rising bond yield environment. ASX listed hybrids underperformed due to new supply from CBA who issued new hybrids pushing market spreads higher. We remain patient and cautiously positioned with reduced allocations to sub investment grade, illiquid and heavily structured credit sectors moving into the latter stages of the credit cycle with pockets of repricing continuing through the year.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned 0.57% (net) and 0.60% (gross). The Fund outperformed the 50% Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill; 50% Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr (Benchmark) by 0.32% (net) in April, which returned 0.25% on the month. The Fund continues its outperformance, beating the Benchmark over the longer term including by 0.2% (net) over the year, and 0.94% (net) since inception per annum.

Spreads on semi-government bonds tracked tighter versus Treasuries, contributing positively to performance.

April was a good month for credit, with most of the attribution coming from higher coupon income as credit spreads stabilised. The Fund added additional alpha by taking advantage of opportunities that arose after the Silicon Valley Bank collapse and Credit Suisse merger. Some of the safest segments from a default risk perspective cheapened as the baby was thrown out with the bath water. These rebounded well in April as rationality prevailed. We took the opportunity to take some profit on those trades that had rallied/rolled down. We remain cautious on the corporate debt sector whilst harnessing the income from taking larger positions in the highest quality credit segments. We remain under invested in higher beta securities with powder dry for future acquisition.

Higher yielding credit sectors were beneficiaries in the more stable credit conditions where positive returns were largely supported by the higher level of income. We remain cautiously positioned with reduced allocations to sub investment grade, illiquid and heavily structured credit sectors moving into the latter stages of the credit cycle.

The strong performance result in April for the Fund, despite bond yields tracking higher, is a good reminder of why simply adding duration to portfolios isn’t as straight forward as it sounds. Our Tactical management of duration (kept very low in April) was vindicated. While we prefer structurally more duration as the economy enters the later stages of the cycle, it pays to be patient. In addition, we took the opportunity to add some credit protection.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned -0.20% (net) and -0.16% (gross). The Fund underperformed the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index (equally weighted) (Benchmark) by -1.92% (net) in March, which returned 1.72% on the month.

Spreads on semi-government bonds tracked wider versus Treasuries, contributing negatively to performance on a relative basis.

Credit spreads weakened over the month, which was a detractor to performance. Generous coupon income helped to preserve capital in what was a challenging month for physical credit. Floating rate credit outperformed fixed rate as investors shifted out of fixed rate bonds and into floating rate notes following the rally in bond yields. Fixed rate bank and corporate credit, including Tier 2 debt, underperformed government bond equivalents.

Our minimised allocation to global high yield, and no allocation to Emerging Markets protected the portfolio from weakening credit returns. In addition, having fully divested from domestic listed hybrids was beneficial as they continued their run of underperformance for the calendar year, underperforming versus cash by -1.6% and underperforming higher ranking Tier 2 securities by -2.5% for the quarter.

Despite the Fund avoiding any idiosyncratic issues, performance in March was hindered by overall credit exposures as markets were roiled by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the forced merger between Credit Suisse and UBS. That said, this month’s weaker result follows strong performance in December, January and February, and the higher underlying yield baked into portfolios helped buffer performance. The Fund commenced adding duration in early March, however, it took a small amount of profit when the risk-off events occurred as the markets briskly moved to pricing in near-term monetary policy easing. Having no duration in the Fund did not provide the offset to spread sector weakness (including credit) that it would have otherwise given the fall in risk-free yields.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

The Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund (Fund) returned 0.64% (net) and 0.67% (gross). The Fund outperformed the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index (equally weighted) (Benchmark) by 1.18% (net) in February, which returned -0.54% on the month. The Fund continues its outperformance, beating the Benchmark over the longer term, including by 2.26% (net) over the year, and 1.08% (net) since inception per annum.

Bond yields rose over the month, unwinding half of the strong positive return gained in the month prior. The price fall on the short end of the yield curve outpaced longer-term bond moves as the curve re-adjusted to the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) hawkish stance, indicating more rate rises to come.

We have remained cautious on adding duration, as our outlook for further central bank tightening is broadly aligned with market pricing. Meanwhile, overweight duration to swap rates over government bonds yields has been a positive contributor. Spreads on semi-government bonds tracked tighter versus Treasuries, contributing positively to performance on a relative basis.

Globally, credit spreads weakened over the month, with Australia outperforming with local spreads 5 basis points (bps) tighter despite strong supply. Generous coupon income also helped buoy performance in the month. Floating rate credit outperformed fixed rate notes given the rise in bond yields. Active allocations to Tier 2 debt were a strong driver of returns as these assets significantly outperformed. We have favoured generating excess returns by having larger positions in high quality assets with greater liquidity, complemented with sub-sectors like Tier 2 where attractive value has been on offer.

Our minimised allocation to global high yield and no emerging market (EM) exposure protected the portfolio. In addition, having fully divested from domestic listed hybrids was beneficial as we believe they still appear poor value relative to other local credit.

Overall, February was a good month for performance, following on from a strong December and January result. Active management was fruitful in the backdrop of a weaker performance month for most sectors within fixed income. The Fund has remained cautious on duration, pairing back duration to near zero. This has helped preserve capital given the back up in yields in February. High coupon income and selective rotation in subsectors of credit enhanced returns. Looking forward, the high yields now built into portfolios are already assisting performance and we expect this to continue in 2023.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee