CFS Wholesale Property Securities (FSF0004AU) Report & Performance

What is the CFS Wholesale Property Securities fund?

The First Sentier Property Securities Fund invests in in a broad selection of Australian listed property companies, with between 10 to 20 stocks typically held in the portfolio.
The fund’s strategy is to bring together specialist resources in order to identify undervalued Australian real estate securities with minimal downside risk, sustainable earnings growth and good qualitative attributes.

  • The fund uses proprietary forecasting and valuation methodologies and a disciplined portfolio construction process with an over-riding focus on absolute and relative risk. The fund invests predominantly in Australian securities and therefore does not hedge currency exposure.
  • The objective is to provide medium-to-long-term capital growth and income to the investor by investing in a portfolio of Australian listed property securities.
  • The Fund aims to outperform the S&P/ASX 200 A-REIT Accumulation Index over rolling three-year periods before fees and taxes.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For CFS Wholesale Property Securities

CFS Wholesale Property Securities Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The fund returned -1.39% in the September quarter, outperforming the ASX 200 A-REIT Index by 155 bps

The funds exposure to the logistics and data centers sector benefitted performance in the quarter. Goodman Group (GMG) experienced a positive market response to its expansion into data centers. Data centers now make up approximately 30% of GMG’s development workbook, and CEO Greg Goodman indicated a significant pipeline of over 3GW of power access. GMG’s operational earnings per share (EPS) also grew by 16% in FY23, driven by strong development results.

Similarly the funds exposure to the lifestyle and communities sector aided performance in the quarter. Ingenia Communities group announced a more prudent set of guidance for the next 3 years which eased investors worried about continual guidance misses. The results also confirmed an increase in land lease sale prices which can be attributed to more desirable geographies and higher quality product. More recently, Ingenia Communities Group was reported to be in talks regarding the sale of some of its Ingenia gardens assets in Western Australia, which was viewed positively by investors.

The fund’s holdings in the convenience retail sector detracted from performance in the quarter. Region RE (RGN) faced challenges from rising debt costs, leading to a weak bottom line FY23 result. Despite positive operating metrics, FY24 Funds From Operations (FFO) guidance of 15.6¢ps is 8% decline year-onyear, and 4% below consensus estimates.

The fund’s holdings in the office sector also detracted from performance in the quarter. In particular the fund’s holdings in GPT group declined in the quarter as a result of office leasing metrics continuing to signal a softer market for landlords.

The fund’s holdings in the fund managers detracted from performance in the quarter. The sector was hampered by a rise in bond yields, due to carrying higher levels of leverage in comparison to the rest of the AREIT sector.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
CFS Wholesale Property SecuritiesFSF0004AUManaged FundsProperty and InfrastructureAustralian Listed PropertyProperty - Australian Listed Property IndexASX Index 200 A-REIT Index133.22 M0.82%0.00%0.3%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
CFS Wholesale Property Securities6.12%12.24%44.47%9.05%7.34%19.93%22.43%17.89%-7.89%-28.61%-73.96%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
CFS Wholesale Property SecuritiesProperty - Australian Listed Property Index0.8%-0.69%NA%NA%NA%1.032.05%2.85%10.99

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
CFS Wholesale Property SecuritiesYes-https://www.cfs.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is CFS Wholesale Property Securities

CFS Wholesale Property Securities is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index and sits inside the Property - Australian Listed Property Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The CFS Wholesale Property Securities has Assets Under Management of 133.22 M with a management fee of 0.82%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.3%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the CFS Wholesale Property Securities has returned 6.12% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 9.05% annualised and 17.89% each year since inception, which is when the CFS Wholesale Property Securities first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since CFS Wholesale Property Securities first started, the Sharpe ratio is NA with an annualised volatility of 17.89%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -7.89% and -73.96% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The CFS Wholesale Property Securities has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Property - Australian Listed Property Index of 0.8% and -0.69% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. CFS Wholesale Property Securities has produced Alpha over the Property - Australian Listed Property Index of NA% in the last 12 months and NA% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Property - Australian Listed Property Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will CFS Wholesale Property Securities provide?

CFS Wholesale Property Securities has a correlation coefficient of 0.99 and a beta of 1.03 when compared to the Property - Australian Listed Property Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on CFS Wholesale Property Securities and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the CFS Wholesale Property Securities with the ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index?

For a full quantitative report on CFS Wholesale Property Securities compared to the ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the CFS Wholesale Property Securities to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the CFS Wholesale Property Securities financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the CFS Wholesale Property Securities been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in CFS Wholesale Property Securities?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the CFS Wholesale Property Securities please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the CFS Wholesale Property Securities?

If you would like to get in contact with the CFS Wholesale Property Securities manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the CFS Wholesale Property Securities. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Video Gallery

No current media available.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The fund returned 1.67% in the June quarter, outperforming the benchmark by 80 bps.

In the Americas, the fund’s holdings in the cold storage sector also aided performance in the quarter due to communication at the recent NAREIT conference surrounding operational improvements. The fund’s holdings in the multi-family housing subsector particularly aided performance as a resilient U.S. employment market coupled with improving consumer confidence has set the stage for improving fundamentals throughout the peak leasing season. The funds exposure to the seniors housing sector also aided performance in the quarter, due to reports that occupancy levels grew in 1Q23 which runs contrary to the normal seasonal pattern and reinforcing the momentum behind the recovery. The funds holdings in the US industrial sector detracted from performance in the quarter due to some reports of negative Q1 absorption in Los Angeles and Inland Empire markets. Similarly, the fund’s holdings in the life science sector detracted from performance as the near term outlook for the sector remains uncertain.

In Europe, the fund’s holdings in the European hotel sector performed well in the quarter. An on market acquisition programme in one of our holdings at nearly a 30% premium to previous close led to the outperformance. The German residential sector also benefitted performance as reports of operational improvements in the quarter which improved investor sentiment. The funds exposures to the UK detracted from performance in the quarter due to a surprise 50bps interest rate rise from the Bank of England.

In Asia, exposures to the large Japanese property landlords benefitted performance due to more buoyant sentiment towards Japanese equity markets as a whole. The funds exposures to the lodging sector in Singapore which benefitted from a surge in RevPar and improved operating margins also benefitted fund performance in the quarter. The fund’s holdings in Hong Kong mostly detracted from performance off weaker investor sentiment in China.

The strategy invests in a range of high quality assets in high barrier to entry urban locations in the world’s most bustling cities.

We are positive on the residential-for-rent sector, which includes apartments, detached housing, manufactured homes and student housing. The riskadjusted returns currently offered by the sector are compelling as residential assets typically deliver very stable cash flows through the cycle. Housing affordability is a major issue for younger generations and we believe the aspiration to own a home will continue to wane as priorities shift towards lifestyle and experiences, which should underpin continued tenant demand for institutionally owned residential-for-rent assets that are able to maintain real pricing power amidst volatile macroeconomic conditions.

We are cautious on the short term outlook for logistical warehousing as risks of a recession in the short term could see tenant demand fall back from elevated levels. We still believe that any short term over-estimations of required supply are transitory, and will be outweighed in the longer term by strong structural tailwinds in the sector. We are also particularly constructive on the cold-storage sector driven by resilient tenant demand for cold storage space.

We remain cautious on the shopping mall sector, which is challenged by the long term structural shift towards online retailing and shorter term recessionary risk. We are more optimistic on the outlook for smaller convenience based, which are less exposed to the risks associated with the threat of online sales with tenant mixes tailored towards non-discretionary sales such as fresh food and services which have lower economic sensitivity.

Similarly, we remain cautious on the outlook for office buildings given the expected secular shifts towards more flexible working arrangements in the future and recessionary risk likely to further reduce tenant demand. We are also cautious on the outlook for hotels and leisure assets with a potential slowdown in tourism and corporate travel as economic growth slows.

We are positive on data centers as replacement values continue to rise increasing barriers to entry which should support rental growth with tenant demand likely to show low economic sensitivity. The sector is well placed over the medium to long term as they are integral to supporting the growth of the digital economy. Recent acquisitions in the sector have highlighted the value of data centres and reaffirmed the need for global scale.

We are also positive supportive on the seniors housing sector. Senior housing fundamentals continue to strengthen as well as being generally supported amidst a period where interest rates are expected to rise. The strong underlying demand drivers of the ageing population are likely to aid the sectors rental fundamentals as occupancies continue to rise.

Increases in the cost of debt and lower levels of debt availability are expected to place pressure on real estate values, however we are optimistic on property types that are able to continue to demonstrate continued pricing power going into an economic slowdown. Furthermore, strong structural trends such as eCommerce adoption, demographics and aging populations, decentralisation of cities, falling home ownership rates and the growth in data consumption should continue to drive performance into the future in both up and down markets.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The fund returned -5.88% in the March quarter, outperforming the ASX 200 A-REIT Index by 91 bps The funds exposure to the residential sector in Stockland benefitted performance in the quarter. Improving residential data points boosted sentiment in the sector, namely the return to positive house price growth and increases in transaction volumes.

The fund’s holdings in the self-storage and logistics sector both benefitted performance in the quarter. Both sectors benefitted from demonstrating relatively defensive characteristics amidst wider market sell-offs.

The portfolios exposures to the fund managers and office sectors underperformed in the month. Both sectors have been impacted by mounting concerns of tightening credit markets and weakness in office markets, which could have ramifications for office values. Volatility in interest rates could result in less investor conviction and lower transaction activity.

The funds exposure to their lifestyle and communities sector through Ingenia Communities Group detracted from performance in the quarter. Revised FY23 guidance based on their reduced home settlements profile saw the stock materially retrace.

The February AREIT reporting season highlighted several key themes across the respective property sub-sectors including issues such as capital management metrics and drivers for earnings growth.

Generally retail landlords reported materially improved operating metrics from the standpoint of: cash collection levels, portfolio occupancy, improvement in like-for-like income growth, re-leasing spreads and reduction in the pool of tenants in holdover. In broad terms sales growth across key segments across the specialty retail categories were materially improved on previous corresponding trading periods. AREITs remain cautious and selective with respective to the deployment of capex for development activity.

The rise in short-term interest rates and the flow on effect for interest rate hedging profiles saw AREITs expecting higher all-in interest rates for 2H2023 and into 2024 which has placed earnings headwinds for a number of AREITs depending on their specific hedging profile. AREITs expect to increase their hedging profile in 2024/2025 yet are awaiting a firmer direction in rates in order to achieve an optimum hedging profile from the standpoint of both rate and level of hedging.

AREITs with material office portfolios reported elevated leasing incentives in order to support face rents in order to address soft demand as tenants weigh up the alternative hybrid office working models and what best fits their business.

Whilst several AREITs have progressed schemes in the pre-development phase for larger office development projects AREITs are looking to sell down a material interest in the office sector to third parties to reduce their capex spend and receive fees for development services provided to third parties.

The logistics sector will remain a development focus for several AREITs that seek to either hold a 100% interest on balance sheet or else sell down a part interest in response to ongoing demand for A grade logistics product. The level of demand has seen some AREITs speculatively develop product in order to receive the mark-to-market rent rather than agree a lower than market rent as a trade-off for securing a tenant pre-commitment.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The fund returned 12.44% in the December quarter, underperforming the ASX 200 A-REIT Index by 64 bps The fund’s holdings in the residential sector and holiday and lifestyle parks sector benefitted performance in the quarter. Despite revising its FY23 guidance to be at the lower end of the previous FY23 range, Ingenia Communities group’s forecast EBIT growth of 30% and EPS growth of 5% could see it have forecast FY23 growth above the sector average which led to the stocks outperformance in the quarter. A relaxation on cash rate expectations is causing investors to become more positive on residential housing markets. Similarly, the funds residential holdings in Mirvac and Stockland aided fund performance for the same reason despite facing short to medium term headwinds. The fund’s exposures to the childcare sector also benefitted performance in the quarter on no stock specific news.

Similarly, the fund’s select exposure to retail AREITs outperformed in the quarter. Region group outperformed as December 2022 revaluations saw its portfolio weighted average capitalisation rate increase by a modest 23bps reflecting both devaluations and acquisitions. The valuation movements underscored the defensive nature of the portfolio’s cash flow. Although consumer sentiment is sitting at historically low levels the funds shopping mall exposures benefitted performance in the month against a backdrop of supportive consumer spending behaviour reflecting a balance between strong employment data offset by heighted inflation levels.

The December 2022 revaluations generally saw capitalisation rates soften and despite above cyclical rent growth saw carrying valuations fall modestly.

The September quarter operational updates saw several themes emerging. For residential developers such as Mirvac Group and Stockland residential lot settlements are materially below settlement levels achieved in the previous corresponding period with reasons for this pullback drawn from the impact of rising rates and potential purchasers waiting for interest rates to stabilize. Despite the reported weakness in the September quarter metrics from a lot settlement standpoint both Mirvac Group and Stockland have reaffirmed their initial FY23 earnings and distribution guidance with both AREITs highlighting a 2HFY23 skew to their respective forecast settlement profiles.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The fund returned -10.46% in the September quarter, underperforming the benchmark by 65 bps.

The portfolios exposures in the Americas detracted from fund performance in the quarter, due to the wider sell off of US REITs. Amidst volatility in US REIT markets, a tactical position in the logistics sector benefitted the funds’ performance in the month as a continuation of M&A activity drove further increases in its share price. The funds exposures to growth oriented sectors such as the data center sector and logistics sector detracted from performance in the quarter. Data centers were more affected by increases in the cost of debt, which is likely to slow future development activity whereas the logistics sector mostly detracted due to heightened recession risks, which swayed investor confidence in the ability to pass through inflation although the sector remains fundamentally sound. The funds exposures to the seniors housing sector also detracted from performance, 2Q earnings came in below expectations. The earnings miss was driven by cost pressures driven by elevated labour expense.

Throughout Europe, macroeconomic headline risk continued to influence listed property markets which was reflected by the greater sell-off of the market. Regionally, the funds exposures through France were more defensive although still declining in the month. At a sector level, the Logistics and German Residential sectors detracted from fund performance as markets factored in property yields expansion weigh down on performance.

The funds exposures to Asia were more resilient in the quarter as the region continues to demonstrate defensive characteristics at times when confidence in American and European property markets wanes. Holdings in large Japanese property landlords continued to aid the portfolios resilience in the quarter, as elevated inflation expectations, a material discount to net asset values and hospitality exposures likely to benefit from the reopening of Japan have aided investor sentiment in the space. Similarly, exposures to the hotel and retail sectors in japan benefitted the funds’ performance in the month.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

The fund returned -16.83% in the June quarter, outperforming the ASX 200 A-REIT Index by 86bps

In the quarter the Australian REITs mostly declined due to a greater than expected interest rate hike and fears that economic conditions will worsen into 2022. The sell-off impacted high growth oriented A-REITs, particularly the logistics sector and funds management companies. As a result the funds’ performance retraced in the quarter, although certain holdings were more defensive which aided the portfolios resilience.

The childcare sector outperformed the AREIT sector in the quarter, which lessened the impact of the greater sector sell-off to the fund. Arena REIT noted the new Labor Federal Government’s proposed changes to the Child Care Subsidy (CCS) should bolster childcare demand which was viewed positively by investors.

Similarly, the funds shopping mall exposure benefitted performance in the quarter following better-than-expected retail trading conditions and cash collections. Vicinity Centres provided an update on its $2.9bn mixed-use development pipeline, which has now progressed to the execution phase after a number of drawbacks in recent years due to Covid. The sector significantly outperformed the AREIT sector in the quarter which aided the funds’ performance.

Exposures to the logistics sector and the lifestyle communities sector both detracted from the funds’ performance in the quarter. The logistics sector was affected by a pullback in development activity in response to an update released by Amazon in the quarter and the lifestyle communities sector saw a reduction in forecast residential lots sales for FY22 due to supply chain issues.

In Australia, we remain well positioned in the logistics sector due to a continuation of strong tenant demand for both existing product reflected in market rent growth ranging from 6%-10% depending on the sub-market as well as a material take-up in demand for newly completed product evidenced in speculative product being fully leased either prior to or at completion. The sector is also demonstrating strong offshore institutional interest who are looking to partner with domestic groups to gain exposure to Australian logistics assets. Despite the positive momentum in valuations sourced from market evidence there is an expectation of still room for capitalisation rates to tighten albeit at a more modest rate than we have seen in the past 2-3 years.

We also remain invested in the shopping mall sector which has seen a better than expected recovery in 2022. Increases in inflation in necessities (particularly food) have not yet shown to affect consumer discretionary spend which has been a positive for the sector. Current development activity in the shopping mall sector is concentrated on backfilling underperforming tenants such as Department Stores and Discount Department Stores. Although shopping malls will be affected by structural tailwinds we continue to remain invested in positions that demonstrate implementation of mixed-use strategy and also in positions showing unwarranted valuation differential.

During June, there was evidence of cap rate expansion (~10bps) in the Australian office sector which is the first sign of what is expected to be a further expansion in the future of (~80bps). Although office utilisation rates have increased from a low base, they will continue to remain affected by remote working flexibility which we believe will affect ‘B grade’ office to a greater extent than it will ‘A grade’ office. Any exposure to the sector will mirror this view.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2022

The Realindex Global Share Hedged Fund returned -1.14% (net of fees) during the March quarter, outperforming the MSCI All Countries World ex Australia Net Index Hedged which returned -5.25% (in AUD). The AUD rose 3.3% against the USD over the quarter. Value stocks outperformed Growth stocks by 8.3% over the quarter (MSCI AC World ex AU Value -4.4% vs. Growth -12.7%, in AUD). Over the past year, Value has outperformed Growth by 3.3% (AUD), while on a five year basis Growth has outperformed Value by 8.1% p.a. (AUD), providing a significant longer-term performance headwind.

The first quarter of 2022 saw market and geopolitical turbulence spurred by the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the 24th of February. This created additional and unexpected supply-side dislocations that has played out in the commodities space, especially in Agriculture and Energy. Whilst Energy stocks were a key mover for this quarter, we note a dichotomy between developed and emerging markets.

Developed market energy stocks performed well, whilst emerging market energy stocks weighed down by the Russian sell-off performed particularly poorly. As fears of an economic downturn continue to give way to managing the risks of a spike in energy, food and commodity prices more broadly, the cyclically oriented Value sectors outperformed defensive Growth oriented sectors. From a style perspective, Value and low risk stocks as highlighted by their historic price volatility were again heavily favoured by investors, while growth related names were the main underperformers. In developed markets, most regions underperformed (MSCI World: -8.2% in AUD terms). Energy and Materials were the two sectors that outperformed all others (MSCI World Energy: +26.5% in AUD terms, MSCI World Materials -0.6% in AUD terms) aided by the renewed surge in commodity prices. Consumer Discretionary (-13.5% in AUD terms) was the largest underperformer. Over the quarter, Value outperformed Growth and the broader market cap index (MSCI World Value at -3.8%, Growth at -12.5% and aggregate at -8.2% in AUD terms). This was largely driven by Energy stocks. Rising interest rates have dampened return expectations of equities with longer dated cash flows, and as such have affected Growth names.

In emerging markets, Russia was delisted from the MSCI EM index in March. As a result, the energy rich Russian market pushed the Energy sector down (MSCI EM Energy: -23.2% in AUD terms). Consumer Discretionary and IT sectors also significantly underperformed (-19.1% and -14.1% in AUD terms respectively). The bulk of this was driven by the Chinese market sell-off over concerns of further US sanctions. Regionally, the largest contributor was the underweight to North America and the largest detractor was the overweight to Developed Asia. From a sector perspective, the largest contributor was the underweight to North America and the largest detractor was the overweight to Developed Asia. The largest stock level contributor was the underweight to Meta Platforms, Inc. and the largest stock level detractor was the overweight to Public Joint Stock Company MMC Norilsk Nickel.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2021

The ASX 200 A-REIT Index underperformed the broader market returning -0.47% in the March 2021 quarter, with the ASX 200 Index returning 3.1%. The best sector performers were the diversified AREITs and AREITs with material exposure to CBD office markets and shopping mall owners. The rollout of Covid-19 vaccines has now begun in Australia and community transmission of the virus has remained supressed. This has boosted optimism now that the majority of remaining restrictions have been loosened, paving the way for a strong rebound in economic growth. The Australian economy continues to recover, whilst retail sales for February fell -0.8% (mom) they were up strongly 9.1% (yoy) providing further evidence of a healthy household sector. The yield on 10-year Australian government bonds rose 82 bps to close at 1.8% during the March quarter. The ‘risk free rate’ remains supportive of the A-REIT sector despite the rise in yield over the March quarter.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee